Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
Auth0 vs OpenID Connect: What are the differences?
Introduction
Auth0 and OpenID Connect are both authentication and authorization protocols that can be used in web development. However, there are key differences between the two. In this article, we will explore six specific differences between Auth0 and OpenID Connect.
1. Token Generation and Management:
Auth0 provides a fully managed service that takes care of token generation and management for you. It allows you to easily issue and revoke access tokens and refresh tokens as needed. On the other hand, OpenID Connect is just a specification that defines how authentication and authorization should work. To implement OpenID Connect, you would need to build the token generation and management functionality yourself.
2. Social Identity Providers:
Auth0 provides out-of-the-box support for a wide range of social identity providers such as Google, Facebook, Twitter, and GitHub. This makes it easy to implement social login functionality in your application. OpenID Connect, on the other hand, does not provide built-in support for social identity providers. You would need to integrate with each provider individually if you want to use them for authentication.
3. User Management:
Auth0 provides a comprehensive user management dashboard that allows you to easily manage users and their permissions. You can create, update, and delete users, as well as assign roles and permissions to them. OpenID Connect does not have built-in user management functionality. You would need to implement user management yourself using a separate user database.
4. Single Sign-On (SSO):
Auth0 supports Single Sign-On (SSO) across multiple applications. Once a user is authenticated with Auth0, they can access other applications that are integrated with Auth0 without needing to authenticate again. OpenID Connect also supports SSO, but it requires additional configuration and setup to implement.
5. Extensibility and Customization:
Auth0 allows you to extend and customize the authentication and authorization process using rules and hooks. You can add custom logic to modify tokens, enrich user profiles, or implement custom authentication flows. OpenID Connect, being a specification, does not provide built-in extensibility and customization features. You would need to implement any customization yourself.
6. Scalability and Performance:
Auth0 is a cloud-based service that provides scalability and high-performance infrastructure out of the box. It can handle a large number of authentication requests without requiring you to manage the infrastructure yourself. OpenID Connect, on the other hand, does not provide any infrastructure or scalability guarantees. It is up to you to ensure that your implementation can handle the required load and scale as needed.
In Summary, Auth0 is a fully managed authentication and authorization service that provides features like token management, social identity provider integration, user management, SSO, extensibility, and scalability. OpenID Connect, on the other hand, is a specification that requires you to implement these features yourself, making it more flexible but also requiring more effort and infrastructure management.
Currently, Passport.js repo has 324 open issues, and Jared (the original author) seems to be the one doing most of the work. Also, given that the documentation is not proper. Is it worth using Passport.js?
As of now, StackShare shows it has 29 companies using it. How do you implement auth in your project or your company? Are there any good alternatives to Passport.js? Should I implement auth from scratch?
I would recommend Auth0 only if you are willing to shell out money. You can keep up with their free version only for a very limited time and as per our experience as a growing startup where budget is an issue, their support was not very helpful as they first asked us to sign a commercial agreement even before helping us t o find out whether Auth0 fits our use case or not! But otherwise Auth0 is a great platform to speed up authentication. In our case we had to move to alternatives like Casbin for multi-tenant authorization!
I started our team on Amazon Cognito because I was a Solutions Architect at AWS and found it really easy to follow the tutorials and get a basic app up and running with it.
When our team started working with it, they very quickly became frustrated because of the poor documentation. After 4 days of trying to get all the basic passwordless auth working, our lead engineer made the decision to abandon it and try Auth0... and managed to get everything implemented in 4 hours.
The consensus was that Cognito just isn't mature enough or well-documented, and that the implementation does not cater for real world use cases the way that it should. I believe Amplify has made some of this simpler, but I would still recommend Auth0 as it's been bulletproof for us, and is a sensible price.
Pros of Auth0
- JSON web token70
- Integration with 20+ Social Providers31
- It's a universal solution20
- SDKs20
- Amazing Documentation15
- Heroku Add-on11
- Enterprise support8
- Great Sample Repos7
- Extend platform with "rules"7
- Azure Add-on4
- Easy integration, non-intrusive identity provider3
- Passwordless3
- It can integrate seamlessly with firebase2
- Great documentation, samples, UX and Angular support2
- Polished2
- On-premise deployment2
- Will sign BAA for HIPAA-compliance1
- MFA1
- Active Directory support1
- Springboot1
- SOC21
- SAML Support1
- Great support1
- OpenID Connect (OIDC) Support1
Pros of OpenID Connect
Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions
Cons of Auth0
- Pricing too high (Developer Pro)15
- Poor support7
- Rapidly changing API4
- Status page not reflect actual status4