StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Utilities
  3. Authentication
  4. User Management And Authentication
  5. Auth0 vs OpenID Connect

Auth0 vs OpenID Connect

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Auth0
Auth0
Stacks1.4K
Followers2.1K
Votes215
OpenID Connect
OpenID Connect
Stacks233
Followers133
Votes0

Auth0 vs OpenID Connect: What are the differences?

Introduction

Auth0 and OpenID Connect are both authentication and authorization protocols that can be used in web development. However, there are key differences between the two. In this article, we will explore six specific differences between Auth0 and OpenID Connect.

1. Token Generation and Management:

Auth0 provides a fully managed service that takes care of token generation and management for you. It allows you to easily issue and revoke access tokens and refresh tokens as needed. On the other hand, OpenID Connect is just a specification that defines how authentication and authorization should work. To implement OpenID Connect, you would need to build the token generation and management functionality yourself.

2. Social Identity Providers:

Auth0 provides out-of-the-box support for a wide range of social identity providers such as Google, Facebook, Twitter, and GitHub. This makes it easy to implement social login functionality in your application. OpenID Connect, on the other hand, does not provide built-in support for social identity providers. You would need to integrate with each provider individually if you want to use them for authentication.

3. User Management:

Auth0 provides a comprehensive user management dashboard that allows you to easily manage users and their permissions. You can create, update, and delete users, as well as assign roles and permissions to them. OpenID Connect does not have built-in user management functionality. You would need to implement user management yourself using a separate user database.

4. Single Sign-On (SSO):

Auth0 supports Single Sign-On (SSO) across multiple applications. Once a user is authenticated with Auth0, they can access other applications that are integrated with Auth0 without needing to authenticate again. OpenID Connect also supports SSO, but it requires additional configuration and setup to implement.

5. Extensibility and Customization:

Auth0 allows you to extend and customize the authentication and authorization process using rules and hooks. You can add custom logic to modify tokens, enrich user profiles, or implement custom authentication flows. OpenID Connect, being a specification, does not provide built-in extensibility and customization features. You would need to implement any customization yourself.

6. Scalability and Performance:

Auth0 is a cloud-based service that provides scalability and high-performance infrastructure out of the box. It can handle a large number of authentication requests without requiring you to manage the infrastructure yourself. OpenID Connect, on the other hand, does not provide any infrastructure or scalability guarantees. It is up to you to ensure that your implementation can handle the required load and scale as needed.

In Summary, Auth0 is a fully managed authentication and authorization service that provides features like token management, social identity provider integration, user management, SSO, extensibility, and scalability. OpenID Connect, on the other hand, is a specification that requires you to implement these features yourself, making it more flexible but also requiring more effort and infrastructure management.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Auth0, OpenID Connect

Vaibhav
Vaibhav

Jul 17, 2020

Needs advice

Currently, Passport.js repo has 324 open issues, and Jared (the original author) seems to be the one doing most of the work. Also, given that the documentation is not proper. Is it worth using Passport.js?

As of now, StackShare shows it has 29 companies using it. How do you implement auth in your project or your company? Are there any good alternatives to Passport.js? Should I implement auth from scratch?

220k views220k
Comments
Brent
Brent

CEO at DEFY Labs

Mar 7, 2020

Decided

I started our team on Amazon Cognito because I was a Solutions Architect at AWS and found it really easy to follow the tutorials and get a basic app up and running with it.

When our team started working with it, they very quickly became frustrated because of the poor documentation. After 4 days of trying to get all the basic passwordless auth working, our lead engineer made the decision to abandon it and try Auth0... and managed to get everything implemented in 4 hours.

The consensus was that Cognito just isn't mature enough or well-documented, and that the implementation does not cater for real world use cases the way that it should. I believe Amplify has made some of this simpler, but I would still recommend Auth0 as it's been bulletproof for us, and is a sensible price.

297k views297k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Auth0
Auth0
OpenID Connect
OpenID Connect

A set of unified APIs and tools that instantly enables Single Sign On and user management to all your applications.

It is a simple identity layer on top of the OAuth 2.0 protocol. It allows Clients to verify the identity of the End-User based on the authentication performed by an Authorization Server, as well as to obtain basic profile information about the End-User in an interoperable and REST-like manner.

User and Password support with verification and forgot password email workflow; Painless SAML Auth with Enterprises; Integration with 20+ Social Providers; SDKs for all platforms mobile and web; Token-based authentication for APIs
-
Statistics
Stacks
1.4K
Stacks
233
Followers
2.1K
Followers
133
Votes
215
Votes
0
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 70
    JSON web token
  • 31
    Integration with 20+ Social Providers
  • 20
    It's a universal solution
  • 20
    SDKs
  • 15
    Amazing Documentation
Cons
  • 15
    Pricing too high (Developer Pro)
  • 7
    Poor support
  • 4
    Rapidly changing API
  • 4
    Status page not reflect actual status
No community feedback yet
Integrations
Amazon S3
Amazon S3
Salesforce Sales Cloud
Salesforce Sales Cloud
Parse
Parse
Firebase
Firebase
Ruby
Ruby
PHP
PHP
Laravel
Laravel
Python
Python
Java
Java
Spring
Spring
JSON Web Token
JSON Web Token
Spring Security
Spring Security
OAuth2
OAuth2

What are some alternatives to Auth0, OpenID Connect?

Stormpath

Stormpath

Stormpath is an authentication and user management service that helps development teams quickly and securely build web and mobile applications and services.

Keycloak

Keycloak

It is an Open Source Identity and Access Management For Modern Applications and Services. It adds authentication to applications and secure services with minimum fuss. No need to deal with storing users or authenticating users. It's all available out of the box.

Devise

Devise

Devise is a flexible authentication solution for Rails based on Warden

Firebase Authentication

Firebase Authentication

It provides backend services, easy-to-use SDKs, and ready-made UI libraries to authenticate users to your app. It supports authentication using passwords, phone numbers, popular federated identity providers like Google,

Amazon Cognito

Amazon Cognito

You can create unique identities for your users through a number of public login providers (Amazon, Facebook, and Google) and also support unauthenticated guests. You can save app data locally on users’ devices allowing your applications to work even when the devices are offline.

WorkOS

WorkOS

Start selling to enterprise customers with just a few lines of code.

OAuth.io

OAuth.io

OAuth is a protocol that aimed to provide a single secure recipe to manage authorizations. It is now used by almost every web application. However, 30+ different implementations coexist. OAuth.io fixes this massive problem by acting as a universal adapter, thanks to a robust API. With OAuth.io integrating OAuth takes minutes instead of hours or days.

OmniAuth

OmniAuth

OmniAuth is a Ruby authentication framework aimed to abstract away the difficulties of working with various types of authentication providers. It is meant to be hooked up to just about any system, from social networks to enterprise systems to simple username and password authentication.

ORY Hydra

ORY Hydra

It is a self-managed server that secures access to your applications and APIs with OAuth 2.0 and OpenID Connect. It is OpenID Connect Certified and optimized for latency, high throughput, and low resource consumption.

Kinde

Kinde

Simple, powerful authentication that you can integrate in minutes. Free your users from passwords with secure and frictionless one click sign up and sign in. Built from the ground up using the best in class security protocols available today.

Related Comparisons

Postman
Swagger UI

Postman vs Swagger UI

Mapbox
Google Maps

Google Maps vs Mapbox

Mapbox
Leaflet

Leaflet vs Mapbox vs OpenLayers

Twilio SendGrid
Mailgun

Mailgun vs Mandrill vs SendGrid

Runscope
Postman

Paw vs Postman vs Runscope