StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Companies
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Blog
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

API StatusChangelog
  1. Stackups
  2. Stackups
  3. Auth0 vs OAuth.io

Auth0 vs OAuth.io

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Auth0
Auth0
Stacks1.3K
Followers2.1K
Votes215
OAuth.io
OAuth.io
Stacks21
Followers145
Votes12

Auth0 vs OAuth.io: What are the differences?

Introduction

As developers, we often come across the need for authentication and authorization in our applications. Two popular solutions for this purpose are Auth0 and OAuth.io. While both provide authentication and authorization services, there are key differences between the two.

  1. Authentication and Authorization Support: Auth0 is a cloud-based platform that provides comprehensive authentication and authorization services. It offers support for various identity providers, such as social logins, enterprise directories, and custom databases. On the other hand, OAuth.io is a service that solely focuses on providing OAuth authentication and authorization solutions. It allows developers to integrate OAuth-based authentication with multiple providers but does not offer support for other identity providers.

  2. Configuration and Customization: Auth0 allows developers to easily configure and customize their authentication and authorization workflows through its user-friendly dashboard. It provides a wide range of options to tailor the authentication experience, including branding, custom domains, and multi-factor authentication. However, OAuth.io has more limited configuration options as it primarily focuses on abstracting the complexity of OAuth integration. It provides a simplified interface for integrating OAuth-based authentication from multiple providers but lacks the extensive customization options offered by Auth0.

  3. Developer Experience and Documentation: Auth0 is known for its developer-centric approach and provides comprehensive documentation and guides to assist developers in implementing authentication and authorization in their applications. It offers SDKs for multiple programming languages and frameworks, making integration easier. In contrast, OAuth.io also provides documentation and guides but may not offer the same level of developer experience and support as Auth0 due to its narrower focus on OAuth integration.

  4. Pricing and Scalability: Auth0 provides flexible pricing plans, including a free tier for limited usage. It offers scalability for applications of all sizes, accommodating both small-scale projects and enterprise-level implementations. On the other hand, OAuth.io offers a limited free plan but primarily focuses on pricing based on the number of provider connections and API calls. While OAuth.io can be suitable for smaller applications with limited authentication needs, it may not offer the same scalability options as Auth0 for larger projects.

  5. Ecosystem and Integration: Auth0 has a larger ecosystem and extensive integration capabilities. It offers pre-built integrations with various frameworks, libraries, and services, making it easier to integrate authentication and authorization into existing applications. In contrast, OAuth.io focuses primarily on OAuth integration, and while it supports multiple providers, it may not offer the same level of ecosystem and integration options as Auth0.

  6. Maintenance and Support: Auth0 provides a managed service, taking care of infrastructure maintenance, updates, and security patches, relieving developers from these responsibilities. It offers robust support channels, including email, chat, and community forums. On the other hand, OAuth.io also provides support, but as a developer-centric platform, it may require developers to handle infrastructure maintenance and updates themselves.

In summary, Auth0 is a comprehensive platform that offers a wide range of authentication and authorization capabilities with extensive customization and support options. OAuth.io, on the other hand, focuses on simplifying OAuth integration but may have limitations in terms of customization, support, and ecosystem compared to Auth0.

Advice on Auth0, OAuth.io

Vaibhav
Vaibhav

Jul 17, 2020

Needs advice

Currently, Passport.js repo has 324 open issues, and Jared (the original author) seems to be the one doing most of the work. Also, given that the documentation is not proper. Is it worth using Passport.js?

As of now, StackShare shows it has 29 companies using it. How do you implement auth in your project or your company? Are there any good alternatives to Passport.js? Should I implement auth from scratch?

220k views220k
Comments
Ryan
Ryan

Aug 30, 2021

Needs adviceonFirebase AuthenticationFirebase AuthenticationAuth0Auth0OktaOkta

Hey all, We're currently weighing up the pros & cons of using Firebase Authentication vs something more OTB like Auth0 or Okta to manage end-user access management for a consumer digital content product. From what I understand so far, Something like Firebase Auth would require more dev effort but is likely to cost less overall, whereas OTB, you have a UI-based console which makes config by non-technical business users easier to manage. Does anyone else have any intuitions or experiences they could share on this, please? Thank you!

1.16M views1.16M
Comments
Brent
Brent

CEO at DEFY Labs

Mar 7, 2020

Decided

I started our team on Amazon Cognito because I was a Solutions Architect at AWS and found it really easy to follow the tutorials and get a basic app up and running with it.

When our team started working with it, they very quickly became frustrated because of the poor documentation. After 4 days of trying to get all the basic passwordless auth working, our lead engineer made the decision to abandon it and try Auth0... and managed to get everything implemented in 4 hours.

The consensus was that Cognito just isn't mature enough or well-documented, and that the implementation does not cater for real world use cases the way that it should. I believe Amplify has made some of this simpler, but I would still recommend Auth0 as it's been bulletproof for us, and is a sensible price.

296k views296k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Auth0
Auth0
OAuth.io
OAuth.io

A set of unified APIs and tools that instantly enables Single Sign On and user management to all your applications.

OAuth is a protocol that aimed to provide a single secure recipe to manage authorizations. It is now used by almost every web application. However, 30+ different implementations coexist. OAuth.io fixes this massive problem by acting as a universal adapter, thanks to a robust API. With OAuth.io integrating OAuth takes minutes instead of hours or days.

User and Password support with verification and forgot password email workflow; Painless SAML Auth with Enterprises; Integration with 20+ Social Providers; SDKs for all platforms mobile and web; Token-based authentication for APIs
Quickly integrate API providers; More than 100 providers available; Secured encrypted API; Simplified API calls; Web and mobile SDKs; User and app activity analytics; Request API: perform actions on behalf of users
Statistics
Stacks
1.3K
Stacks
21
Followers
2.1K
Followers
145
Votes
215
Votes
12
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 70
    JSON web token
  • 31
    Integration with 20+ Social Providers
  • 20
    SDKs
  • 20
    It's a universal solution
  • 15
    Amazing Documentation
Cons
  • 15
    Pricing too high (Developer Pro)
  • 7
    Poor support
  • 4
    Status page not reflect actual status
  • 4
    Rapidly changing API
Pros
  • 4
    SDK's
  • 3
    Integration with 100+ Providers
  • 1
    Heroku add-on
  • 1
    Extreme simplicity
  • 1
    Useful screenshots
Integrations
Amazon S3
Amazon S3
Salesforce Sales Cloud
Salesforce Sales Cloud
Parse
Parse
Firebase
Firebase
Ruby
Ruby
PHP
PHP
Laravel
Laravel
Python
Python
Java
Java
Spring
Spring
No integrations available

What are some alternatives to Auth0, OAuth.io?

Stormpath

Stormpath

Stormpath is an authentication and user management service that helps development teams quickly and securely build web and mobile applications and services.

Keycloak

Keycloak

It is an Open Source Identity and Access Management For Modern Applications and Services. It adds authentication to applications and secure services with minimum fuss. No need to deal with storing users or authenticating users. It's all available out of the box.

Devise

Devise

Devise is a flexible authentication solution for Rails based on Warden

Firebase Authentication

Firebase Authentication

It provides backend services, easy-to-use SDKs, and ready-made UI libraries to authenticate users to your app. It supports authentication using passwords, phone numbers, popular federated identity providers like Google,

Amazon Cognito

Amazon Cognito

You can create unique identities for your users through a number of public login providers (Amazon, Facebook, and Google) and also support unauthenticated guests. You can save app data locally on users’ devices allowing your applications to work even when the devices are offline.

WorkOS

WorkOS

Start selling to enterprise customers with just a few lines of code.

OmniAuth

OmniAuth

OmniAuth is a Ruby authentication framework aimed to abstract away the difficulties of working with various types of authentication providers. It is meant to be hooked up to just about any system, from social networks to enterprise systems to simple username and password authentication.

ORY Hydra

ORY Hydra

It is a self-managed server that secures access to your applications and APIs with OAuth 2.0 and OpenID Connect. It is OpenID Connect Certified and optimized for latency, high throughput, and low resource consumption.

Kinde

Kinde

Simple, powerful authentication that you can integrate in minutes. Free your users from passwords with secure and frictionless one click sign up and sign in. Built from the ground up using the best in class security protocols available today.

Satellizer

Satellizer

Satellizer is a simple to use, end-to-end, token-based authentication module for AngularJS with built-in support for Google, Facebook, LinkedIn, Twitter authentication providers, plus Email and Password sign-in method. You are not limited to the sign-in options above, in fact you can add any OAuth 1.0 or OAuth 2.0 provider by passing provider-specific information during the configuration step.

Related Comparisons

Postman
Swagger UI

Postman vs Swagger UI

Mapbox
Google Maps

Google Maps vs Mapbox

Mapbox
Leaflet

Leaflet vs Mapbox vs OpenLayers

Twilio SendGrid
Mailgun

Mailgun vs Mandrill vs SendGrid

Runscope
Postman

Paw vs Postman vs Runscope