Litmus vs MailGenius: What are the differences?
Litmus: Email Testing and Email Marketing Analytics *. Litmus is a testing service for web and marketing professionals. It allows people to cross-browser test their websites, and test their email newsletters across a range of email clients and spam filters; *MailGenius:** Email Spam Checker & Testing Tool. Send emails that don't end up in the spam folder. Find out if your email is likely to trigger spam filters. Run a free email spam and security test in less than one minute.
Litmus and MailGenius belong to "Email Testing" category of the tech stack.
Some of the features offered by Litmus are:
- You send us a copy of your email design, either by uploading the HTML or sending us a test email. Within a couple of minutes you'll see screenshots of your email as it's rendered by all the different email clients. Made a change? One click starts a re-test.
- PREVIEW IN REAL EMAIL CLIENTS- Litmus shows you screenshots of your email newsletter as it looks across all major email clients.
- CHECK ON MOBILE DEVICES- See your email on the most popular mobile devices. Litmus even lets you realistically scroll your email on the device.
On the other hand, MailGenius provides the following key features:
- Prevent outsiders from spoofing your domain via personalized instructions to configure your domain properly for email
- Find out if your server or domain are on any major blacklists
- Discover how good your subject line is
What is Litmus?
What is MailGenius?
Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
Why do developers choose MailGenius?
What are the cons of using Litmus?
What are the cons of using MailGenius?
What companies use MailGenius?
Sign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions
What tools integrate with MailGenius?
Used Litmus at my previous employer and found it to be easy to use, with a great selection of email clients, and plain text. Even pretty old clients that I didn't think were around anymore! The display vs what I saw in the actual client was usually pretty accurate. Occasional differences, and can take a while to run all the tests. But, with so many clients, it's understandable.