StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Container Registry
  4. Container Tools
  5. LXD vs Rancher

LXD vs Rancher

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Rancher
Rancher
Stacks952
Followers1.5K
Votes644
LXD
LXD
Stacks104
Followers194
Votes68

LXD vs Rancher: What are the differences?

## Introduction
Essentially, LXD and Rancher are both tools that aim to simplify container and virtual machine management. However, there are significant differences between the two platforms.

1. **Orchestration Capabilities**: One key difference is that Rancher provides advanced orchestration capabilities through its integration with Kubernetes, allowing users to manage containers at scale with ease. On the other hand, LXD focuses more on lightweight hypervisor management and does not offer built-in orchestration features.

2. **Focus on Scale**: Rancher is designed to be highly scalable, making it well-suited for large-scale deployments. It can easily manage hundreds or even thousands of containers across multiple hosts, ensuring high availability and ease of management. In contrast, LXD is better suited for smaller-scale deployments or individual users seeking an efficient virtualization solution.

3. **Community Support**: Rancher has a strong community of users and contributors, providing extensive documentation, support forums, and a marketplace for containerized applications. This vibrant community ensures rapid development, continuous improvements, and a wealth of resources for users. While LXD also has a community, it may not be as extensive or robust as Rancher's.

4. **Management Interface**: Rancher offers a user-friendly web-based management interface that simplifies container orchestration, monitoring, and deployment tasks. Users can easily configure and manage their containerized applications through an intuitive dashboard. In contrast, LXD may require more technical expertise to interact with, as it primarily relies on a command-line interface for management tasks.

5. **Integration with Ecosystem**: Rancher provides seamless integration with a wide range of tools and services, including load balancers, storage solutions, networking plugins, and more. This level of integration simplifies the deployment and management of complex containerized applications. While LXD offers integration with some tools, it may not be as extensive or flexible as Rancher's ecosystem.

6. **Enterprise Support and Services**: Rancher offers enterprise-level support, training, professional services, and premium features for organizations seeking mission-critical container management solutions. This level of support ensures that businesses can deploy and manage containers with confidence, backed by a dedicated team of experts. In contrast, LXD may not offer the same level of enterprise support and services as Rancher.

In Summary, while LXD and Rancher both aim to simplify container management, Rancher excels in scalable orchestration, community support, management interface, ecosystem integration, and enterprise-grade services, making it a preferred choice for large-scale deployments and businesses seeking comprehensive container management solutions.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Rancher, LXD

Florian
Florian

IT DevOp at Agitos GmbH

Oct 22, 2019

Decided

lxd/lxc and Docker aren't congruent so this comparison needs a more detailed look; but in short I can say: the lxd-integrated administration of storage including zfs with its snapshot capabilities as well as the system container (multi-process) approach of lxc vs. the limited single-process container approach of Docker is the main reason I chose lxd over Docker.

483k views483k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Rancher
Rancher
LXD
LXD

Rancher is an open source container management platform that includes full distributions of Kubernetes, Apache Mesos and Docker Swarm, and makes it simple to operate container clusters on any cloud or infrastructure platform.

LXD isn't a rewrite of LXC, in fact it's building on top of LXC to provide a new, better user experience. Under the hood, LXD uses LXC through liblxc and its Go binding to create and manage the containers. It's basically an alternative to LXC's tools and distribution template system with the added features that come from being controllable over the network.

Manage Hosts, Deploy Containers, Monitor Resources;User Management & Collaboration;Native Docker APIs & Tools;Monitoring and Logging;Connect Containers, Manage Disks, Deploy Load Balancers;Docker App Catalog; Included Kubernetes Distribution;Included Docker Swarm Distribution; Included Mesos Distribution;Infrastructure Management
-
Statistics
Stacks
952
Stacks
104
Followers
1.5K
Followers
194
Votes
644
Votes
68
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 103
    Easy to use
  • 79
    Open source and totally free
  • 63
    Multi-host docker-compose support
  • 58
    Simple
  • 58
    Load balancing and health check included
Cons
  • 10
    Hosting Rancher can be complicated
Pros
  • 10
    More simple
  • 8
    API
  • 8
    Open Source
  • 8
    Best
  • 7
    Cluster
Integrations
Jenkins
Jenkins
Datadog
Datadog
Google Compute Engine
Google Compute Engine
Docker Compose
Docker Compose
Amazon EC2
Amazon EC2
DigitalOcean
DigitalOcean
GitHub
GitHub
Docker
Docker
Kubernetes
Kubernetes
Drone.io
Drone.io
LXC
LXC

What are some alternatives to Rancher, LXD?

Docker

Docker

The Docker Platform is the industry-leading container platform for continuous, high-velocity innovation, enabling organizations to seamlessly build and share any application — from legacy to what comes next — and securely run them anywhere

Kubernetes

Kubernetes

Kubernetes is an open source orchestration system for Docker containers. It handles scheduling onto nodes in a compute cluster and actively manages workloads to ensure that their state matches the users declared intentions.

Docker Compose

Docker Compose

With Compose, you define a multi-container application in a single file, then spin your application up in a single command which does everything that needs to be done to get it running.

Docker Swarm

Docker Swarm

Swarm serves the standard Docker API, so any tool which already communicates with a Docker daemon can use Swarm to transparently scale to multiple hosts: Dokku, Compose, Krane, Deis, DockerUI, Shipyard, Drone, Jenkins... and, of course, the Docker client itself.

Tutum

Tutum

Tutum lets developers easily manage and run lightweight, portable, self-sufficient containers from any application. AWS-like control, Heroku-like ease. The same container that a developer builds and tests on a laptop can run at scale in Tutum.

Portainer

Portainer

It is a universal container management tool. It works with Kubernetes, Docker, Docker Swarm and Azure ACI. It allows you to manage containers without needing to know platform-specific code.

Codefresh

Codefresh

Automate and parallelize testing. Codefresh allows teams to spin up on-demand compositions to run unit and integration tests as part of the continuous integration process. Jenkins integration allows more complex pipelines.

LXC

LXC

LXC is a userspace interface for the Linux kernel containment features. Through a powerful API and simple tools, it lets Linux users easily create and manage system or application containers.

CAST.AI

CAST.AI

It is an AI-driven cloud optimization platform for Kubernetes. Instantly cut your cloud bill, prevent downtime, and 10X the power of DevOps.

k3s

k3s

Certified Kubernetes distribution designed for production workloads in unattended, resource-constrained, remote locations or inside IoT appliances. Supports something as small as a Raspberry Pi or as large as an AWS a1.4xlarge 32GiB server.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana