Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
Add tool
LXD vs Rancher: What are the differences?
## Introduction
Essentially, LXD and Rancher are both tools that aim to simplify container and virtual machine management. However, there are significant differences between the two platforms.
1. **Orchestration Capabilities**: One key difference is that Rancher provides advanced orchestration capabilities through its integration with Kubernetes, allowing users to manage containers at scale with ease. On the other hand, LXD focuses more on lightweight hypervisor management and does not offer built-in orchestration features.
2. **Focus on Scale**: Rancher is designed to be highly scalable, making it well-suited for large-scale deployments. It can easily manage hundreds or even thousands of containers across multiple hosts, ensuring high availability and ease of management. In contrast, LXD is better suited for smaller-scale deployments or individual users seeking an efficient virtualization solution.
3. **Community Support**: Rancher has a strong community of users and contributors, providing extensive documentation, support forums, and a marketplace for containerized applications. This vibrant community ensures rapid development, continuous improvements, and a wealth of resources for users. While LXD also has a community, it may not be as extensive or robust as Rancher's.
4. **Management Interface**: Rancher offers a user-friendly web-based management interface that simplifies container orchestration, monitoring, and deployment tasks. Users can easily configure and manage their containerized applications through an intuitive dashboard. In contrast, LXD may require more technical expertise to interact with, as it primarily relies on a command-line interface for management tasks.
5. **Integration with Ecosystem**: Rancher provides seamless integration with a wide range of tools and services, including load balancers, storage solutions, networking plugins, and more. This level of integration simplifies the deployment and management of complex containerized applications. While LXD offers integration with some tools, it may not be as extensive or flexible as Rancher's ecosystem.
6. **Enterprise Support and Services**: Rancher offers enterprise-level support, training, professional services, and premium features for organizations seeking mission-critical container management solutions. This level of support ensures that businesses can deploy and manage containers with confidence, backed by a dedicated team of experts. In contrast, LXD may not offer the same level of enterprise support and services as Rancher.
In Summary, while LXD and Rancher both aim to simplify container management, Rancher excels in scalable orchestration, community support, management interface, ecosystem integration, and enterprise-grade services, making it a preferred choice for large-scale deployments and businesses seeking comprehensive container management solutions.
Decisions about LXD and Rancher
Florian Sager
IT DevOp at Agitos GmbH · | 3 upvotes · 412.1K views
lxd/lxc and Docker aren't congruent so this comparison needs a more detailed look; but in short I can say: the lxd-integrated administration of storage including zfs with its snapshot capabilities as well as the system container (multi-process) approach of lxc vs. the limited single-process container approach of Docker is the main reason I chose lxd over Docker.
Get Advice from developers at your company using StackShare Enterprise. Sign up for StackShare Enterprise.
Learn MorePros of LXD
Pros of Rancher
Pros of LXD
- More simple10
- Open Source8
- API8
- Best8
- Cluster7
- Multiprocess isolation (not single)5
- Fast5
- I like the goal of the LXD and found it to work great5
- Full OS isolation4
- Container3
- More stateful than docker3
- Systemctl compatibility2
Pros of Rancher
- Easy to use103
- Open source and totally free79
- Multi-host docker-compose support63
- Load balancing and health check included58
- Simple58
- Rolling upgrades, green/blue upgrades feature44
- Dns and service discovery out-of-the-box42
- Only requires docker37
- Multitenant and permission management34
- Easy to use and feature rich29
- Cross cloud compatible11
- Does everything needed for a docker infrastructure11
- Simple and powerful8
- Next-gen platform8
- Very Docker-friendly7
- Support Kubernetes and Swarm6
- Application catalogs with stack templates (wizards)6
- Supports Apache Mesos, Docker Swarm, and Kubernetes6
- Rolling and blue/green upgrades deployments6
- High Availability service: keeps your app up 24/76
- Easy to use service catalog5
- Very intuitive UI4
- IaaS-vendor independent, supports hybrid/multi-cloud4
- Awesome support4
- Scalable3
- Requires less infrastructure requirements2
Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions
Cons of LXD
Cons of Rancher
Cons of LXD
Be the first to leave a con
Cons of Rancher
- Hosting Rancher can be complicated10
Sign up to add or upvote consMake informed product decisions
What is LXD?
LXD isn't a rewrite of LXC, in fact it's building on top of LXC to provide a new, better user experience. Under the hood, LXD uses LXC through liblxc and its Go binding to create and manage the containers. It's basically an alternative to LXC's tools and distribution template system with the added features that come from being controllable over the network.
What is Rancher?
Rancher is an open source container management platform that includes full distributions of Kubernetes, Apache Mesos and Docker Swarm, and makes it simple to operate container clusters on any cloud or infrastructure platform.
Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
What companies use LXD?
What companies use Rancher?
What companies use LXD?
What companies use Rancher?
See which teams inside your own company are using LXD or Rancher.
Sign up for StackShare EnterpriseLearn MoreSign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions
What tools integrate with LXD?
What tools integrate with Rancher?
What tools integrate with LXD?
What tools integrate with Rancher?
Sign up to get full access to all the tool integrationsMake informed product decisions
Blog Posts
What are some alternatives to LXD and Rancher?
Docker
The Docker Platform is the industry-leading container platform for continuous, high-velocity innovation, enabling organizations to seamlessly build and share any application — from legacy to what comes next — and securely run them anywhere
LXC
LXC is a userspace interface for the Linux kernel containment features. Through a powerful API and simple tools, it lets Linux users easily create and manage system or application containers.
KVM
KVM (for Kernel-based Virtual Machine) is a full virtualization solution for Linux on x86 hardware containing virtualization extensions (Intel VT or AMD-V).
Kubernetes
Kubernetes is an open source orchestration system for Docker containers. It handles scheduling onto nodes in a compute cluster and actively manages workloads to ensure that their state matches the users declared intentions.
VirtualBox
VirtualBox is a powerful x86 and AMD64/Intel64 virtualization product for enterprise as well as home use. Not only is VirtualBox an extremely feature rich, high performance product for enterprise customers, it is also the only professional solution that is freely available as Open Source Software under the terms of the GNU General Public License (GPL) version 2.