Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

LXD

104
194
+ 1
68
Rancher

944
1.5K
+ 1
644
Add tool

LXD vs Rancher: What are the differences?

## Introduction
Essentially, LXD and Rancher are both tools that aim to simplify container and virtual machine management. However, there are significant differences between the two platforms.

1. **Orchestration Capabilities**: One key difference is that Rancher provides advanced orchestration capabilities through its integration with Kubernetes, allowing users to manage containers at scale with ease. On the other hand, LXD focuses more on lightweight hypervisor management and does not offer built-in orchestration features.

2. **Focus on Scale**: Rancher is designed to be highly scalable, making it well-suited for large-scale deployments. It can easily manage hundreds or even thousands of containers across multiple hosts, ensuring high availability and ease of management. In contrast, LXD is better suited for smaller-scale deployments or individual users seeking an efficient virtualization solution.

3. **Community Support**: Rancher has a strong community of users and contributors, providing extensive documentation, support forums, and a marketplace for containerized applications. This vibrant community ensures rapid development, continuous improvements, and a wealth of resources for users. While LXD also has a community, it may not be as extensive or robust as Rancher's.

4. **Management Interface**: Rancher offers a user-friendly web-based management interface that simplifies container orchestration, monitoring, and deployment tasks. Users can easily configure and manage their containerized applications through an intuitive dashboard. In contrast, LXD may require more technical expertise to interact with, as it primarily relies on a command-line interface for management tasks.

5. **Integration with Ecosystem**: Rancher provides seamless integration with a wide range of tools and services, including load balancers, storage solutions, networking plugins, and more. This level of integration simplifies the deployment and management of complex containerized applications. While LXD offers integration with some tools, it may not be as extensive or flexible as Rancher's ecosystem.

6. **Enterprise Support and Services**: Rancher offers enterprise-level support, training, professional services, and premium features for organizations seeking mission-critical container management solutions. This level of support ensures that businesses can deploy and manage containers with confidence, backed by a dedicated team of experts. In contrast, LXD may not offer the same level of enterprise support and services as Rancher.

In Summary, while LXD and Rancher both aim to simplify container management, Rancher excels in scalable orchestration, community support, management interface, ecosystem integration, and enterprise-grade services, making it a preferred choice for large-scale deployments and businesses seeking comprehensive container management solutions.
Decisions about LXD and Rancher
Florian Sager
IT DevOp at Agitos GmbH · | 3 upvotes · 412.1K views
Chose
LXDLXD
over
DockerDocker

lxd/lxc and Docker aren't congruent so this comparison needs a more detailed look; but in short I can say: the lxd-integrated administration of storage including zfs with its snapshot capabilities as well as the system container (multi-process) approach of lxc vs. the limited single-process container approach of Docker is the main reason I chose lxd over Docker.

See more
Get Advice from developers at your company using StackShare Enterprise. Sign up for StackShare Enterprise.
Learn More
Pros of LXD
Pros of Rancher
  • 10
    More simple
  • 8
    Open Source
  • 8
    API
  • 8
    Best
  • 7
    Cluster
  • 5
    Multiprocess isolation (not single)
  • 5
    Fast
  • 5
    I like the goal of the LXD and found it to work great
  • 4
    Full OS isolation
  • 3
    Container
  • 3
    More stateful than docker
  • 2
    Systemctl compatibility
  • 103
    Easy to use
  • 79
    Open source and totally free
  • 63
    Multi-host docker-compose support
  • 58
    Load balancing and health check included
  • 58
    Simple
  • 44
    Rolling upgrades, green/blue upgrades feature
  • 42
    Dns and service discovery out-of-the-box
  • 37
    Only requires docker
  • 34
    Multitenant and permission management
  • 29
    Easy to use and feature rich
  • 11
    Cross cloud compatible
  • 11
    Does everything needed for a docker infrastructure
  • 8
    Simple and powerful
  • 8
    Next-gen platform
  • 7
    Very Docker-friendly
  • 6
    Support Kubernetes and Swarm
  • 6
    Application catalogs with stack templates (wizards)
  • 6
    Supports Apache Mesos, Docker Swarm, and Kubernetes
  • 6
    Rolling and blue/green upgrades deployments
  • 6
    High Availability service: keeps your app up 24/7
  • 5
    Easy to use service catalog
  • 4
    Very intuitive UI
  • 4
    IaaS-vendor independent, supports hybrid/multi-cloud
  • 4
    Awesome support
  • 3
    Scalable
  • 2
    Requires less infrastructure requirements

Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions

Cons of LXD
Cons of Rancher
    Be the first to leave a con
    • 10
      Hosting Rancher can be complicated

    Sign up to add or upvote consMake informed product decisions

    What is LXD?

    LXD isn't a rewrite of LXC, in fact it's building on top of LXC to provide a new, better user experience. Under the hood, LXD uses LXC through liblxc and its Go binding to create and manage the containers. It's basically an alternative to LXC's tools and distribution template system with the added features that come from being controllable over the network.

    What is Rancher?

    Rancher is an open source container management platform that includes full distributions of Kubernetes, Apache Mesos and Docker Swarm, and makes it simple to operate container clusters on any cloud or infrastructure platform.

    Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

    What companies use LXD?
    What companies use Rancher?
    See which teams inside your own company are using LXD or Rancher.
    Sign up for StackShare EnterpriseLearn More

    Sign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions

    What tools integrate with LXD?
    What tools integrate with Rancher?

    Sign up to get full access to all the tool integrationsMake informed product decisions

    Blog Posts

    PythonDockerKubernetes+7
    3
    1102
    May 21 2020 at 12:02AM

    Rancher Labs

    KubernetesAmazon EC2Grafana+12
    5
    1497
    Apr 16 2020 at 5:34AM

    Rancher Labs

    KubernetesRancher+2
    2
    938
    What are some alternatives to LXD and Rancher?
    Docker
    The Docker Platform is the industry-leading container platform for continuous, high-velocity innovation, enabling organizations to seamlessly build and share any application — from legacy to what comes next — and securely run them anywhere
    LXC
    LXC is a userspace interface for the Linux kernel containment features. Through a powerful API and simple tools, it lets Linux users easily create and manage system or application containers.
    KVM
    KVM (for Kernel-based Virtual Machine) is a full virtualization solution for Linux on x86 hardware containing virtualization extensions (Intel VT or AMD-V).
    Kubernetes
    Kubernetes is an open source orchestration system for Docker containers. It handles scheduling onto nodes in a compute cluster and actively manages workloads to ensure that their state matches the users declared intentions.
    VirtualBox
    VirtualBox is a powerful x86 and AMD64/Intel64 virtualization product for enterprise as well as home use. Not only is VirtualBox an extremely feature rich, high performance product for enterprise customers, it is also the only professional solution that is freely available as Open Source Software under the terms of the GNU General Public License (GPL) version 2.
    See all alternatives