Material Design for Bootstrap vs Material-UI: What are the differences?
Material Design for Bootstrap and Material-UI can be primarily classified as "Front-End Frameworks" tools.
"Bootstrap" is the top reason why over 14 developers like Material Design for Bootstrap, while over 51 developers mention "React" as the leading cause for choosing Material-UI.
Material Design for Bootstrap and Material-UI are both open source tools. Material-UI with 48.6K GitHub stars and 11K forks on GitHub appears to be more popular than Material Design for Bootstrap with 19.9K GitHub stars and 3.31K GitHub forks.
According to the StackShare community, Material-UI has a broader approval, being mentioned in 69 company stacks & 80 developers stacks; compared to Material Design for Bootstrap, which is listed in 5 company stacks and 6 developer stacks.
What is Material Design for Bootstrap?
What is Material-UI?
Want advice about which of these to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
Sign up to add, upvote and see more prosMake informed product decisions
What are the cons of using Material Design for Bootstrap?
Sign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions
What tools integrate with Material Design for Bootstrap?
Sign up to get full access to all the tool integrationsMake informed product decisions
Material UI provides Cloudcraft.co with a clean, professional looking and very easy to use set of UI components build with React. The few issues we've reported to the developers have been quickly fixed each time. I highly recommend using Material UI for both consumer and enterprise web apps. The styling system in particular is very nice to work with, and allows you to easily add your own brand's look and feel throughout the UI.
We like the pure simplicity of Google's Material UI. It is simply too much overhead today to design custom UI styles.