Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
Material Design vs UIkIt: What are the differences?
Introduction
Material Design and UIkit are two popular design frameworks used to create websites or mobile applications. While both frameworks aim to provide a visually appealing and user-friendly experience, there are several key differences between them that differentiate their design principles, components, and functionalities.
Design Principles: Material Design, developed by Google, follows the principles of flat design with minimalistic and clean aesthetics. It emphasizes depth and shadow effects to provide a more realistic experience. On the other hand, UIkit focuses on a lightweight and modular approach, offering a visually simple and intuitive design while avoiding excessive use of shadows or gradients.
Components and Customization: Material Design offers a wide range of pre-built components like buttons, navigation bars, and cards that can be easily customized to fit specific design requirements. It provides a comprehensive set of guidelines and assets for designers to maintain consistency and familiarity across different platforms. UIkit, on the other hand, provides a flexible and extensible framework with modular components that can be easily customized and combined to create unique designs. It offers more freedom and options for developers who want to create their own designs from scratch.
Integration and Platform Support: Material Design is tightly integrated with Google's ecosystem, making it suitable for designing Android apps, web applications, or websites that align with Google's visual language. It provides seamless integration with Google services, including Google Maps and Google Drive. On the other hand, UIkit is platform-independent and can be used to design websites or web applications that work on different platforms, including iOS, Android, or desktop browsers. It provides support and compatibility for various browsers and devices.
Animation and Interaction: Material Design puts a strong emphasis on motion and animation to enhance user experience. It provides predefined animations and transitions that can be easily applied to different components, creating a more dynamic interface. UIkit, although it also supports animations and transitions, offers a more lightweight approach without sacrificing performance. It provides smooth and subtle animations that contribute to a seamless user experience.
Documentation and Community: Material Design benefits from extensive documentation provided by Google. It offers comprehensive guidelines, best practices, and resources for designers and developers. It has a large and active community that supports the framework, which leads to regular updates and improvements. UIkit also provides detailed documentation and resources, but its community might not be as extensive as Material Design. However, UIkit has a strong following within the developer community, with active forums and support.
Dependency and File Size: Material Design relies on Google's Material Components library, which requires additional dependencies and can increase the file sizes of the projects. This could affect the loading speed and performance of websites or applications. UIkit, on the other hand, is a standalone framework that does not require any additional dependencies. It is lightweight and provides optimized file sizes, resulting in better performance and faster loading times.
In Summary, Material Design offers a visually appealing experience with depth and shadow effects, while UIkit focuses on a lightweight and modular design approach. Material Design is tightly integrated with Google's ecosystem and offers extensive documentation and community support. On the other hand, UIkit provides a more flexible and customizable framework, works on multiple platforms, and has optimized file sizes for better performance.
I am a bit confused when to choose Bootstrap vs Material Design or Tailwind CSS, and why? I mean, in which kind of projects we can work with bootstrap/Material/Tailwind CSS? If the design is made up on the grid, we prefer bootstrap, and if flat design, then material design. Similarly, when do we choose tailwind CSS?
Any suggestion would be appreciated?
I don't know about material design.
You would go with Bootstrap if you want to prototype / build something without bothering about the design at all and you are OK if everything looks kinda template-y, using bootstrap out of the box components.
Go with Tailwind if you need a sleek design, a user interface where building with components will be important (because tailwind strongly favors component-based UI), and you know you will need to extend the built-in classes with your own (because tailwind is very easy to extend)
I would personally recommend tailwind over bootstrap any day of the week.
Hi Ashish,
If you need minimal work to be done from your end and like most of the components / design available out of the box - go with Bootstrap. This is the oldest and has the widest adoption and a whole range of components built out by others.
If you like Material design, this is a good choice too. Please note that Bootstrap also has a Material theme, though it is not as native.
Both of these above frameworks are bulky and has more than what you may need.
If you like to build micro-components in a elegant way, TailwindCSS is the way to go.
Tailwind is great you don't have to mess with naming things and it is so much more flexible than the cookie cutter bootstrap, but I don't know about material UI. I recommend tailwind it's super simple to learn and has great code snippets.
Put simply, you should use Tailwind regardless. It is a great addition to whatever you use because it removes the hassle of writing CSS.
I'm building, from scratch, a webapp. It's going to be a dashboard to check on our apps in New Relic and update the Apdex from the webapp. I have just chosen Next.js as our framework because we use React already, and after going through the tutorial, I just loved the latest changes they have implemented.
But we have to decide on a CSS framework for the UI. I'm partial to Bulma because I love that it's all about CSS (and you can use SCSS from the start), that it's rather lightweight and that it doesn't come with JavaScript clutter. One of the things I hate about Bootstrap is that you depend on jQuery to use the JavaScript part. My boss loves UIkIt, but when I've used it in the past, I didn't like it.
What do you think we should use? Maybe you have another suggestion?
I have used bulma in several projects. We could not customize with the websites very well. Also when we need "quick solutions" Bulma is not suitable (I mean basic animations, to-top buttons, transparent navbar solutions etc. For these solutions, you need extra js codes).
Everybody knows about Bootstrap (heavy but popular).
Now we start a new project with UI kit, I like it. Pros: It is fast and lightweight and imho it has very good UI. Cons: Small community. Documentation.
Check this link for kick-off. https://github.com/zzseba78/Kick-Off
Maybe it is helpful.
Been checking out Bulma, myself, and really dig it. I like that it's a great base level jumping off point. You can get a layout going with it, pretty quickly, and then customize as you want. It definitely sounds like it's the one you're leaning towards but a big factor would be who will be using it most? Your boss, yourself, others? Whichever you like best, you'll prob be most productive with but if in the end your boss says it has to be UIkit, then best to be open-minded and give it another shot. Sometimes you may not jive with new tools in your stack, at first, but then they can become tools you learn to love. Best to you in your decision! Take care & keep safe.
I've moved away from the concept of UI kits. Not that many support CSS grid. A lot of the icons are easier to use in SVG. I've had success in the concept of design framework and design tokens. I build my brand identity in Figma, and extract in Diez. Then Diez integrates into React and SASS. Much easier because design is decoupled from software in a central authority, and software updates automatically from design changes.
Honestly - pick whatever you are the most comfortable with. You can achieve almost the same effects with different tools, so why not use something I like using?
Actually it really depends on your needs, there are 3 types of UI frameworks you can use:
-
A complete set of UI components like: https://react-bulma.dev/en/getting-started.
Pros:
Having a lot of pre-built UI components saves a lot of time
Cons:
need to learn the react framework and the bulma styles, and it's harder to customize to your needs
-
A pure css framework, like Bulma, where you write all the components yourself.
Pros:
A lot of flexibility to build the components you need
Cons:
You are bound to Bulma classes and markup.
Takes more time since you need to build the components
A utility class framework like: https://tailwindcss.com/.
Pros:
Most flexible, mix and match classes as you like and build your own markup
Very easy to customize to your needs
Cons:
Might take time to get used to and takes more time since you need to build the components
If you choose options one, then it's just a matter of deciding what style you like (material,ant, bulma) and go with the library that implements it If you go with pure css and build your own components, I can't recommend tailwind enough, I've been finding myself building entire pages without writing a single line of css.
And if later on, the designer wants to make a change to some color, or size, I just need to change one value in the config file, and the entire app is updated.
I used UIKit and Bootstrap many times. I love Bootstrap for fast, easy layouts to web apps. Clean code, easiest and fastest way to write layouts for front end if you learned something before about Bootstrap. Now in React I use React-Boostrap too. About UIKit I can say its nice idea. It's easier than Bootstrap. This is good option for trainee developer to learn how u should create layout of your website, but for me UIKit have not enough functions. If you need to create something complicated, u have an error in your mind. You must create amazing code combinations for UIKit where in Bootstrap in the same ideas you have easy solutions.
We are re-modifying the existing portal to the new one. Looking out for a CSS framework where over-rides are possible, the performance of page loading, extendable, etc Please suggest between tailwind, UIkit and bootstrap frameworks explaining in detail on different factors. I request your help on the same.
Hey Sai, My thoughts on UIkit - It's beautiful, fast, and it has good animation too. Why would I choose it ? Nothing other than giving the internet a new look .
My thoughts on Bootstrap - it's beautiful, if used well. It's very fast and has clean class naming convention unlike Uikit. Why I would choose it ? It's been tested and trusted, I can find a whole lot of resources and a community around it. Also with the type of project you working on I bet Bootstrap would do the job .
Now, considering Tailwind, it's seen as a classic, simple-to-set-up tool with clean utilities. I wouldn't think of tailwind the way I would to Bootstrap or UIkit. What do I mean ? Tailwind is more like a tool set to create your own design flow. Tailwind allows you to build unique design elements, offering you a level of customization that may be unmatched by the other frameworks.
My final thoughts.
If you have the time , setup and use tailwind it will give you a great chance when it comes to customization and performance.
I'm a big proponent of Tailwind and I personally use it whenever I get the chance, mostly because it's not really a UI-kit, but it sounds like in this case a UI-kit like Bootstrap with pre-defined components is more what you are looking for. Bootstrap is (relatively) extendable and overridable and makes it really simple to make a decent looking UI using a handful of pre-defined classes, whereas with Tailwind you configure the classes and create your own components. My main reason for replacing Bootstrap in my workflow is that it feels like the component creation has become so abstracted from the developer that any meaningful customization becomes a chore, resulting in many websites having the generic "Bootstrap-look". Nonetheless, it is effective for creating a pleasant and responsive UI. Though, I don't have any experience with UIkit.
Ant Design offers the most components with JS and CSS taken care of. They look clean, professional, and usable.
We paired this with Bulma for making the containers and structure reactive. Bulma (for react) make it easy to just add a section, container, and content and have it work on all platforms.
We also use Geist UI, though not recognized by Stack share, for its simple and modern feel. Highly recommend Geist if you want modern components for complicated UI's
Pros of Material Design
- They really set a new bar in design5
- An intuitive design4
- Simply, And Beautiful3
- Many great libraries2
- Composants0
Pros of UIkIt
- Complete GUI39
- Easy modify29
- Practical27
- Easy to learn24
- Functional24
- Intuitive22
- Free21
- Simple16
- Lightweight15
- Easy to use15
- Modular5
- Because I can create amazing things with little effort5
- Modern look5
- Responsiveness4
- Small but Active Community3
- Convenient JS Components2
- Based on Flexbox2
- No requires jquery2
- Responsive grid2
Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions
Cons of Material Design
- Sometimes, it can hang the browser2