StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Frameworks
  4. Front End Frameworks
  5. Material UI vs Primer

Material UI vs Primer

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Material-UI
Material-UI
Stacks2.7K
Followers3.7K
Votes445
Primer
Primer
Stacks12
Followers53
Votes7

Material UI vs Primer: What are the differences?

Introduction

In the world of web development, there are various UI frameworks available that help in creating visually appealing and user-friendly interfaces. Two such popular frameworks are Material UI and Primer. Although they both serve the same purpose, there are some key differences between them that set them apart. In this Markdown code, we will explore and highlight these differences in a concise manner.

  1. Design Philosophy: Material UI follows Google's Material Design principles and guidelines, offering a modern and sleek visual design with smooth animations and transitions. On the other hand, Primer, developed by GitHub, follows a more minimalist and simple design philosophy, focusing on providing a lightweight and intuitive user experience.

  2. Component Library: Material UI provides a vast and comprehensive set of pre-built components, making it easier to create complex and feature-rich interfaces. It offers a wide range of UI components such as buttons, cards, menus, forms, and more. Primer, on the other hand, has a more limited component library with a focus on commonly used components, catering specifically to GitHub's design language and requirements.

  3. Customization Options: Material UI provides extensive customization options, allowing developers to easily modify the appearance and behavior of components to match their specific needs. It offers theming capabilities, CSS-in-JS styling, and the ability to override default styles with ease. In comparison, Primer has a more opinionated approach to customization, providing a limited set of options to maintain design consistency within GitHub's ecosystem.

  4. Documentation and Community Support: Material UI has a large and active community, which translates into comprehensive documentation, numerous tutorials, and a vast array of community-contributed resources. This makes troubleshooting and finding solutions to common problems relatively easier. While Primer also has a dedicated community, its resources and documentation are relatively more focused on supporting GitHub-specific use cases.

  5. Accessibility: Material UI places a strong emphasis on accessibility, ensuring that the components are designed and developed to be usable by individuals with disabilities. It follows WCAG 2.1 guidelines and provides powerful accessibility features out of the box. Primer also prioritizes accessibility but focuses more on meeting GitHub's specific accessibility requirements and may not cover the full range of WCAG guidelines.

  6. Integration and Compatibility: Material UI integrations are not limited to a specific technology or framework. It can be seamlessly integrated into various JavaScript frameworks like React, Angular, and Vue, allowing developers the flexibility to choose their preferred development stack. On the other hand, Primer is primarily designed to be used within GitHub's ecosystem and may require additional effort to integrate into non-GitHub projects.

In Summary, Material UI and Primer differ in their design philosophy, component library, customization options, documentation and community support, accessibility focus, and integration compatibility. These differences cater to the specific needs and preferences of developers, allowing them to choose the framework that aligns best with their project requirements.

Please note that the provided descriptions are based on general observations and may vary as the frameworks evolve and release updates.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Material-UI, Primer

Kexin
Kexin

Mar 4, 2021

Decided

I replaced Bootstrap with Material-UI during the front-end UI development, because Material-UI adopts a component-based importing style, making it suit well in a "React programming style". This makes me comfortable when programming because I can treat importing UI components as other React components I define.

281k views281k
Comments
Kabir
Kabir

Nov 29, 2021

Review

I don't recommend that you use Vue but that is just my biased opinion for react against vue. If you want a better user experience, use Next.js server side rendering. You will need to use Web Assembly to compile your unity 3d game on the web. DO NOT use html, css and js for your game. I recommend you use a tailwind UI kit, Chakra UI or material UI.

16.2k views16.2k
Comments
Xinyi
Xinyi

Software Developer at DCSIL

Oct 9, 2020

Decided

As our team will be building a web application, HTML5 and CSS3 are one of the standardized combinations to implement the structure and the styling of a webpage. Material-UI comes with all sorts of predesigned web components such as buttons and dropdowns that will save us tons of development time. Since it is a component library designed for React, it suits our needs. However, we do acknowledge that predesigned components may sometimes cause pains especially when it comes to custom styling. To make our life even easier, we also adopted Tailwind CSS. It is a CSS framework providing low-level utility classes that will act as building blocks when we create custom designs.

359k views359k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Material-UI
Material-UI
Primer
Primer

Material UI is a library of React UI components that implements Google's Material Design.

Primer is the basecoat of GitHub, made by nerds just like you who share a passion for HTML and CSS.

Tables; Forms; Snackbars; Buttons; Theming
-
Statistics
Stacks
2.7K
Stacks
12
Followers
3.7K
Followers
53
Votes
445
Votes
7
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 141
    React
  • 82
    Material Design
  • 60
    Ui components
  • 30
    CSS framework
  • 26
    Component
Cons
  • 36
    Hard to learn. Bad documentation
  • 29
    Hard to customize
  • 22
    Hard to understand Docs
  • 9
    Bad performance
  • 7
    Extra library needed for date/time pickers
Pros
  • 4
    simple
  • 2
    Pretty
  • 1
    Maintained by GitHub
Integrations
React
React
Emotion
Emotion
Next.js
Next.js
styled-components
styled-components
Node.js
Node.js
No integrations available

What are some alternatives to Material-UI, Primer?

Bootstrap

Bootstrap

Bootstrap is the most popular HTML, CSS, and JS framework for developing responsive, mobile first projects on the web.

Foundation

Foundation

Foundation is the most advanced responsive front-end framework in the world. You can quickly prototype and build sites or apps that work on any kind of device with Foundation, which includes layout constructs (like a fully responsive grid), elements and best practices.

Semantic UI

Semantic UI

Semantic empowers designers and developers by creating a shared vocabulary for UI.

Materialize

Materialize

A CSS Framework based on material design.

Material Design for Angular

Material Design for Angular

Material Design is a specification for a unified system of visual, motion, and interaction design that adapts across different devices. Our goal is to deliver a lean, lightweight set of AngularJS-native UI elements that implement the material design system for use in Angular SPAs.

Blazor

Blazor

Blazor is a .NET web framework that runs in any browser. You author Blazor apps using C#/Razor and HTML.

Quasar Framework

Quasar Framework

Build responsive Single Page Apps, SSR Apps, PWAs, Hybrid Mobile Apps and Electron Apps, all using the same codebase!, powered with Vue.

Nuxt.js

Nuxt.js

Nuxt.js presets all the configuration needed to make your development of a Vue.js application enjoyable. You can use Nuxt.js for SSR, SPA, Static Generated, PWA and more.

UIkIt

UIkIt

UIkit gives you a comprehensive collection of HTML, CSS, and JS components which is simple to use, easy to customize and extendable.

Tailwind CSS

Tailwind CSS

Tailwind is different from frameworks like Bootstrap, Foundation, or Bulma in that it's not a UI kit. It doesn't have a default theme, and there are no build-in UI components. It comes with a menu of predesigned widgets to build your site with, but doesn't impose design decisions that are difficult to undo.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase