StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Frameworks
  4. Front End Frameworks
  5. Material-UI vs Web Components

Material-UI vs Web Components

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Material-UI
Material-UI
Stacks2.7K
Followers3.7K
Votes445
Web Components
Web Components
Stacks82
Followers60
Votes0

Material-UI vs Web Components: What are the differences?

Introduction

Material-UI and Web Components are two popular technologies used in web development. Material-UI is a React UI framework that implements the Material Design principles of Google, while Web Components are a set of web platform APIs that allow you to create reusable custom elements.

Key Differences between Material-UI and Web Components

  1. Integration: Material-UI is tightly integrated with React and provides a set of pre-designed components that can be easily used in React applications. It leverages the component-based architecture and virtual DOM updates of React to provide a seamless user experience. On the other hand, Web Components are framework-agnostic and can be used with any JavaScript framework or even without a framework. They provide a way to create custom HTML elements that can be used across different frameworks.

  2. Design Philosophy: Material-UI follows the Material Design guidelines and provides pre-designed, ready-to-use components that adhere to these design principles. It provides a consistent and visually appealing UI out of the box, making it easier for developers to create visually pleasing applications. Web Components, on the other hand, do not dictate a specific design philosophy. They provide a way to create encapsulated, reusable components that can be styled and customized according to the developer's preferences.

  3. Development Experience: Material-UI provides a rich set of components and utility functions that simplify complex UI tasks. It has a well-documented API and a large community that actively contributes to its development. Material-UI also provides a theming system that allows for easy customization of the components. Web Components, however, require more manual effort to create and style the components. They do not have a built-in theming system and may require additional styling libraries or custom CSS.

  4. Accessibility: Material-UI puts a strong focus on accessibility and provides accessible components out of the box. It follows the accessibility guidelines of Material Design and provides keyboard navigation, ARIA attributes, and other accessibility best practices. Web Components, on the other hand, do not enforce any specific accessibility guidelines. It is the responsibility of the developer to ensure that the created components are accessible to all users.

  5. Browser Support: Material-UI is built on top of React and leverages its compatibility with a wide range of browsers. React provides polyfills and fallbacks for features not supported in older browsers, making Material-UI compatible with a wide range of browser versions. Web Components, on the other hand, rely on the native browser support for custom elements and shadow DOM. While these features are supported in modern browsers, they may require polyfills or additional libraries to work in older browsers.

  6. Community and Ecosystem: Material-UI has a vibrant and active community that contributes to its development and provides support to other developers. It has a large ecosystem of plugins, extensions, and tools that enhance its functionality and make it easier to integrate with other libraries. Web Components also have a growing community but may not have as extensive an ecosystem as Material-UI. The availability of third-party libraries and tools may vary for different aspects of Web Components.

In summary, Material-UI is a React-based UI framework that provides pre-designed components following the Material Design guidelines, with strong integration, a focus on accessibility, and a rich ecosystem. Web Components, on the other hand, are a browser-based technology that allows developers to create reusable custom elements that can be used across different frameworks, with more flexibility in design and broader browser compatibility.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Material-UI, Web Components

Gericke
Gericke

Jul 27, 2020

Needs adviceon.NET Core.NET CoreJavaScriptJavaScriptReactReact

Hi,

I am looking into solutions for reusable components for an existing #MVC project which is build on .NET Core. Currently some functionality is being reuses via JavaScript. I have React experience so I know I can create React components and then reference it on the MVC app. The only problem is I do not know the full extent of it as the current app uses a lot of 3rd party libraries, not sure how that will effect React components. I am currently looking into WebComponents which is also another way for creating reusable components and it is compatible with any JavaScript library based on what I have seen on the website. Also to take in consideration that it should cause a re-write of the system.

So my question is, to future-proof reusable components, which will be best React or Web Components? And which will be more reliable to use with 3rd party libraries?

49.1k views49.1k
Comments
Abigail
Abigail

Dec 10, 2019

Decided

Fonts and typography are fun. Material Design is a framework (developed by Google) that basically geeks out on how to assemble your typographical elements together into a design language. If you're into fonts and typography, it's fantastic. It provides a theming engine, reusable components, and can pull different user interfaces together under a common design paradigm. I'd highly recommend looking into Borries Schwesinger's book "The Form Book" if you're going to be working with Material UI or are otherwise new to component design.

https://www.amazon.com/Form-Book-Creating-Printed-Online/dp/0500515085

766k views766k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Material-UI
Material-UI
Web Components
Web Components

Material UI is a library of React UI components that implements Google's Material Design.

Web components are a set of web platform APIs that allow you to create new custom, reusable, encapsulated HTML tags to use in web pages and web apps.

Tables; Forms; Snackbars; Buttons; Theming
-
Statistics
Stacks
2.7K
Stacks
82
Followers
3.7K
Followers
60
Votes
445
Votes
0
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 141
    React
  • 82
    Material Design
  • 60
    Ui components
  • 30
    CSS framework
  • 26
    Component
Cons
  • 36
    Hard to learn. Bad documentation
  • 29
    Hard to customize
  • 22
    Hard to understand Docs
  • 9
    Bad performance
  • 7
    For editable table component need to use material-table
No community feedback yet
Integrations
React
React
Emotion
Emotion
Next.js
Next.js
styled-components
styled-components
Node.js
Node.js
No integrations available

What are some alternatives to Material-UI, Web Components?

Bootstrap

Bootstrap

Bootstrap is the most popular HTML, CSS, and JS framework for developing responsive, mobile first projects on the web.

Foundation

Foundation

Foundation is the most advanced responsive front-end framework in the world. You can quickly prototype and build sites or apps that work on any kind of device with Foundation, which includes layout constructs (like a fully responsive grid), elements and best practices.

Semantic UI

Semantic UI

Semantic empowers designers and developers by creating a shared vocabulary for UI.

Materialize

Materialize

A CSS Framework based on material design.

Material Design for Angular

Material Design for Angular

Material Design is a specification for a unified system of visual, motion, and interaction design that adapts across different devices. Our goal is to deliver a lean, lightweight set of AngularJS-native UI elements that implement the material design system for use in Angular SPAs.

Blazor

Blazor

Blazor is a .NET web framework that runs in any browser. You author Blazor apps using C#/Razor and HTML.

Quasar Framework

Quasar Framework

Build responsive Single Page Apps, SSR Apps, PWAs, Hybrid Mobile Apps and Electron Apps, all using the same codebase!, powered with Vue.

Nuxt.js

Nuxt.js

Nuxt.js presets all the configuration needed to make your development of a Vue.js application enjoyable. You can use Nuxt.js for SSR, SPA, Static Generated, PWA and more.

UIkIt

UIkIt

UIkit gives you a comprehensive collection of HTML, CSS, and JS components which is simple to use, easy to customize and extendable.

Tailwind CSS

Tailwind CSS

Tailwind is different from frameworks like Bootstrap, Foundation, or Bulma in that it's not a UI kit. It doesn't have a default theme, and there are no build-in UI components. It comes with a menu of predesigned widgets to build your site with, but doesn't impose design decisions that are difficult to undo.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase