Get Advice Icon

Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

Materialize

690
1.2K
+ 1
557
Next.js

7K
4.9K
+ 1
327
Add tool

Materialize vs Next.js: What are the differences?

  1. Integration with React Components: Next.js is a React framework that simplifies the process of building React applications, while Materialize is a CSS framework that provides pre-designed components. Next.js offers seamless integration with React components, allowing developers to easily incorporate interactive elements into their web applications. On the other hand, Materialize focuses on styling and provides ready-made components that can be customized to fit the design requirements.

  2. Server-side Rendering: Next.js has built-in support for server-side rendering, enabling faster page loading and improved performance. This feature is particularly useful for SEO purposes and enhancing user experience. In contrast, Materialize focuses more on the front-end presentation of web pages and does not offer server-side rendering capabilities out of the box.

  3. Customization Options: Materialize offers a wide range of customization options for its pre-designed components, allowing developers to tailor the appearance of their web applications to suit their needs. In comparison, Next.js focuses on simplifying the development process and may have limited customization options for styling components unless additional CSS frameworks or libraries are integrated.

  4. Community Support and Documentation: Next.js has a strong community of developers and comprehensive documentation, making it easier for developers to find resources and solutions to common problems. Materialize also has a supportive community but may have slightly fewer resources and documentation compared to Next.js due to its focus on CSS styling rather than full-stack web development.

  5. Backend Functionality: Next.js can easily handle backend functionality with its built-in API routes, enabling developers to create serverless functions and interact with databases. Materialize, being primarily a front-end CSS framework, does not offer backend functionality and is more suitable for enhancing the visual appearance of web applications rather than handling complex server-side processes.

  6. Build and Deployment Process: Next.js provides a streamlined build and deployment process, offering features like automatic code splitting and optimized bundle sizes for improved performance. Materialize, being a CSS framework, does not affect the build and deployment process significantly and can be used alongside Next.js for styling purposes without impacting the performance of the application.

In Summary, Next.js and Materialize differ in their focus on integration with React components, server-side rendering capabilities, customization options, community support and documentation, backend functionality, and build and deployment processes.

Decisions about Materialize and Next.js
Lucas Litton
Founder & CEO at Macombey · | 13 upvotes · 575.8K views

Next.js is probably the most enjoyable React framework our team could have picked. The development is an extremely smooth process, the file structure is beautiful and organized, and the speed is no joke. Our work with Next.js comes out much faster than if it was built on pure React or frameworks alike. We were previously developing all of our projects in Meteor before making the switch. We left Meteor due to the slow compiler and website speed. We deploy all of our Next.js projects on Vercel.

See more

Hey guys,

My backend set up is Prisma / GraphQL-Yoga at the moment, and I love it. It's so intuitive to learn and is really neat on the frontend too, however, there were a few gotchas when I was learning! Especially around understanding how it all pieces together (the stack). There isn't a great deal of information out there on exactly how to put into production my set up, which is a backend set up on a Digital Ocean droplet with Prisma/GraphQL Yoga in a Docker Container using Next & Apollo Client on the frontend somewhere else. It's such a niche subject, so I bet only a few hundred people have got a website with this stack in production. Anyway, I wrote a blog post to help those who might need help understanding it. Here it is, hope it helps!

See more
Manage your open source components, licenses, and vulnerabilities
Learn More
Pros of Materialize
Pros of Next.js
  • 102
    Google material design
  • 74
    Easy to use
  • 74
    Responsive
  • 54
    Modern looks
  • 48
    Open source
  • 42
    Good documentation
  • 37
    Code examples
  • 29
    Extremely light - 29kb
  • 28
    Flexible
  • 15
    Great Support
  • 10
    It looks beautiful
  • 8
    Very nice looking components to quickly build out
  • 7
    Smooth animation
  • 6
    Great Grid System
  • 4
    Great
  • 4
    Ruby gem to integrate in 2 seconds flat
  • 3
    Angular2 Support
  • 2
    MIT Lisence
  • 2
    Friendly api, easy setup, good documentation
  • 2
    Easy setup
  • 1
    React
  • 1
    Grid system
  • 1
    Because of the easy to use and very editable library
  • 1
    Responsivness
  • 1
    Jibberish
  • 1
    Friendly Api
  • 0
    Better class name
  • 0
    Rtl support
  • 51
    Automatic server rendering and code splitting
  • 44
    Built with React
  • 34
    Easy setup
  • 26
    TypeScript
  • 24
    Universal JavaScript
  • 22
    Zero setup
  • 21
    Static site generator
  • 12
    Simple deployment
  • 12
    Just JavaScript
  • 12
    Incremental static regeneration
  • 10
    Well Documented
  • 10
    Filesystem as an API
  • 10
    Frictionless development
  • 9
    Everything is a function
  • 8
    Has many examples and integrations
  • 8
    Testing
  • 7
    Isomorphic React applications
  • 4
    File based routing + hooks built in
  • 2
    Deployment
  • 1
    SEO

Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions

Cons of Materialize
Cons of Next.js
  • 7
    Mobile errors
  • 6
    Poor Grid System
  • 2
    Unmaintained
  • 9
    Structure is weak compared to Angular(2+)

Sign up to add or upvote consMake informed product decisions

373
3.6K
14.9K
2

What is Materialize?

A CSS Framework based on material design.

What is Next.js?

Next.js is a minimalistic framework for server-rendered React applications.

Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

Jobs that mention Materialize and Next.js as a desired skillset
What companies use Materialize?
What companies use Next.js?
Manage your open source components, licenses, and vulnerabilities
Learn More

Sign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions

What tools integrate with Materialize?
What tools integrate with Next.js?

Sign up to get full access to all the tool integrationsMake informed product decisions

Blog Posts

What are some alternatives to Materialize and Next.js?
Bootstrap
Bootstrap is the most popular HTML, CSS, and JS framework for developing responsive, mobile first projects on the web.
Material Design
Material Design is a unified system that combines theory, resources, and tools for crafting digital experiences.
Material
Express your creativity with Material, an animation and graphics framework for Google's Material Design and Apple's Flat UI in Swift.
Angular Material
Sprint from Zero to App. Hit the ground running with comprehensive, modern UI components that work across the web, mobile and desktop. It allows to create material styled angular apps fast and easy.
Material-UI
Material UI is a library of React UI components that implements Google's Material Design.
See all alternatives