Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
Materialize vs Next.js: What are the differences?
Integration with React Components: Next.js is a React framework that simplifies the process of building React applications, while Materialize is a CSS framework that provides pre-designed components. Next.js offers seamless integration with React components, allowing developers to easily incorporate interactive elements into their web applications. On the other hand, Materialize focuses on styling and provides ready-made components that can be customized to fit the design requirements.
Server-side Rendering: Next.js has built-in support for server-side rendering, enabling faster page loading and improved performance. This feature is particularly useful for SEO purposes and enhancing user experience. In contrast, Materialize focuses more on the front-end presentation of web pages and does not offer server-side rendering capabilities out of the box.
Customization Options: Materialize offers a wide range of customization options for its pre-designed components, allowing developers to tailor the appearance of their web applications to suit their needs. In comparison, Next.js focuses on simplifying the development process and may have limited customization options for styling components unless additional CSS frameworks or libraries are integrated.
Community Support and Documentation: Next.js has a strong community of developers and comprehensive documentation, making it easier for developers to find resources and solutions to common problems. Materialize also has a supportive community but may have slightly fewer resources and documentation compared to Next.js due to its focus on CSS styling rather than full-stack web development.
Backend Functionality: Next.js can easily handle backend functionality with its built-in API routes, enabling developers to create serverless functions and interact with databases. Materialize, being primarily a front-end CSS framework, does not offer backend functionality and is more suitable for enhancing the visual appearance of web applications rather than handling complex server-side processes.
Build and Deployment Process: Next.js provides a streamlined build and deployment process, offering features like automatic code splitting and optimized bundle sizes for improved performance. Materialize, being a CSS framework, does not affect the build and deployment process significantly and can be used alongside Next.js for styling purposes without impacting the performance of the application.
In Summary, Next.js and Materialize differ in their focus on integration with React components, server-side rendering capabilities, customization options, community support and documentation, backend functionality, and build and deployment processes.
Next.js is probably the most enjoyable React framework our team could have picked. The development is an extremely smooth process, the file structure is beautiful and organized, and the speed is no joke. Our work with Next.js comes out much faster than if it was built on pure React or frameworks alike. We were previously developing all of our projects in Meteor before making the switch. We left Meteor due to the slow compiler and website speed. We deploy all of our Next.js projects on Vercel.
Hey guys,
My backend set up is Prisma / GraphQL-Yoga at the moment, and I love it. It's so intuitive to learn and is really neat on the frontend too, however, there were a few gotchas when I was learning! Especially around understanding how it all pieces together (the stack). There isn't a great deal of information out there on exactly how to put into production my set up, which is a backend set up on a Digital Ocean droplet with Prisma/GraphQL Yoga in a Docker Container using Next & Apollo Client on the frontend somewhere else. It's such a niche subject, so I bet only a few hundred people have got a website with this stack in production. Anyway, I wrote a blog post to help those who might need help understanding it. Here it is, hope it helps!
Pros of Materialize
- Google material design102
- Easy to use74
- Responsive74
- Modern looks54
- Open source48
- Good documentation42
- Code examples37
- Extremely light - 29kb29
- Flexible28
- Great Support15
- It looks beautiful10
- Very nice looking components to quickly build out8
- Smooth animation7
- Great Grid System6
- Great4
- Ruby gem to integrate in 2 seconds flat4
- Angular2 Support3
- MIT Lisence2
- Friendly api, easy setup, good documentation2
- Easy setup2
- React1
- Grid system1
- Because of the easy to use and very editable library1
- Responsivness1
- Jibberish1
- Friendly Api1
- Better class name0
- Rtl support0
Pros of Next.js
- Automatic server rendering and code splitting51
- Built with React44
- Easy setup34
- TypeScript26
- Universal JavaScript24
- Zero setup22
- Static site generator21
- Simple deployment12
- Just JavaScript12
- Incremental static regeneration12
- Well Documented10
- Filesystem as an API10
- Frictionless development10
- Everything is a function9
- Has many examples and integrations8
- Testing8
- Isomorphic React applications7
- File based routing + hooks built in4
- Deployment2
- SEO1
Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions
Cons of Materialize
- Mobile errors7
- Poor Grid System6
- Unmaintained2
Cons of Next.js
- Structure is weak compared to Angular(2+)9