Mattermost vs Skype: What are the differences?
Key Differences between Mattermost and Skype
Mattermost and Skype are both communication platforms; however, they have several key differences that set them apart.
1. Integration Capabilities: Mattermost offers a wide range of integration capabilities, allowing users to integrate various tools and services into their communication platform. On the other hand, Skype has limited integration options, with fewer opportunities to integrate external tools or services.
2. Self-Hosted vs Cloud-based: Mattermost is a self-hosted communication platform, meaning that organizations have full control over their data and can host the platform on their own servers. Skype, on the other hand, is a cloud-based service, where data is stored and managed in Microsoft's cloud infrastructure.
3. Open Source vs Proprietary: Mattermost is an open-source platform, allowing users to access and modify the source code to suit their needs. This enables greater customization and flexibility. Skype, on the other hand, is a proprietary platform, meaning that users do not have access to the source code and cannot modify the software.
4. Cost: Mattermost offers different pricing plans, including a free version with limited features, as well as paid plans with additional functionality and support options. Skype, on the other hand, offers both free and paid plans, but some advanced features may require a subscription or payment.
5. Target Audience: While both Mattermost and Skype cater to a wide range of users, Mattermost primarily targets organizations and teams that require secure and private communication channels. Skype, on the other hand, is popular among individual users and has a broader consumer-focused audience.
6. Audio and Video Quality: Mattermost offers high-quality audio and video calls, ensuring clear communication and collaboration. Skype is known for its excellent audio and video quality, providing a reliable platform for video conferences and calls.
In summary, Mattermost and Skype differ in terms of their integration capabilities, hosting options, source code accessibility, cost, target audience, and audio/video quality.
