Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
McRouter vs Redis: What are the differences?
Key Differences Between McRouter and Redis
1. Scalability and Performance: Mcrouter is specifically designed to handle the high-scale demands of large-scale Facebook applications, enabling horizontal scalability with its routing capabilities. It acts as a middle layer between clients and caches, effectively distributing the requests and reducing the load on individual servers. On the other hand, Redis is an in-memory data store that prioritizes fast data retrieval and is mainly used for caching, session storage, and real-time analytics in smaller-scale applications.
2. Flexibility and Data Structure Support: Redis provides an extensive set of data structures and features, including strings, lists, sets, hashes, sorted sets, and geospatial indexes. It allows users to perform operations on these data structures, making it a versatile choice for various use cases. Mcrouter, on the other hand, focuses on routing and cache management and does not offer the same breadth of data structure support as Redis.
3. Persistence and Durability: Redis offers both in-memory and persistent storage options, allowing the data to be saved to disk for durability. It provides various persistence mechanisms, such as snapshotting and append-only file (AOF) logs, ensuring that data is not lost during system failures. Mcrouter, being a routing layer, does not provide persistent storage capabilities and relies on the underlying caches for data persistence.
4. Replication and High Availability: Redis supports master-slave replication, enabling data to be replicated across multiple nodes for high availability and fault tolerance. It allows for automatic failover in case the master node goes down. Mcrouter, on the other hand, does not offer native replication capabilities. It primarily focuses on routing requests and load balancing across multiple cache instances.
5. Handling Complex Routing Logic: Mcrouter excels in handling complex routing logic with its advanced routing capabilities. It allows developers to define routing rules based on various criteria, including keys, prefixes, and regular expressions. This allows for fine-grained control over request routing and caching. Redis, on the other hand, does not provide such advanced routing features as it primarily focuses on data storage and retrieval.
6. Ecosystem and Community Support: Redis has a large and active community of developers, providing extensive documentation, tutorials, and support. It also has a wide range of client libraries available in different programming languages, making it easy to integrate with various applications. Mcrouter, being a Facebook-developed tool, has a relatively smaller community and may have limited third-party integrations and resources available compared to Redis.
In summary, Mcrouter is specifically designed for high-scale applications, offering advanced routing capabilities and easy integration with Facebook's cache infrastructure. On the other hand, Redis provides a versatile and feature-rich in-memory data store, suitable for various use cases with extensive community support.
Pros of McRouter
Pros of Redis
- Performance887
- Super fast542
- Ease of use514
- In-memory cache444
- Advanced key-value cache324
- Open source194
- Easy to deploy182
- Stable165
- Free156
- Fast121
- High-Performance42
- High Availability40
- Data Structures35
- Very Scalable32
- Replication24
- Pub/Sub23
- Great community22
- "NoSQL" key-value data store19
- Hashes16
- Sets13
- Sorted Sets11
- Lists10
- NoSQL10
- Async replication9
- BSD licensed9
- Integrates super easy with Sidekiq for Rails background8
- Bitmaps8
- Open Source7
- Keys with a limited time-to-live7
- Lua scripting6
- Strings6
- Awesomeness for Free5
- Hyperloglogs5
- Runs server side LUA4
- Transactions4
- Networked4
- Outstanding performance4
- Feature Rich4
- Written in ANSI C4
- LRU eviction of keys4
- Data structure server3
- Performance & ease of use3
- Temporarily kept on disk2
- Dont save data if no subscribers are found2
- Automatic failover2
- Easy to use2
- Scalable2
- Channels concept2
- Object [key/value] size each 500 MB2
- Existing Laravel Integration2
- Simple2
Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions
Cons of McRouter
Cons of Redis
- Cannot query objects directly15
- No secondary indexes for non-numeric data types3
- No WAL1