StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Utilities
  3. API Tools
  4. Microservices Tools
  5. Micro vs Pact

Micro vs Pact

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Micro
Micro
Stacks89
Followers55
Votes2
Pact
Pact
Stacks59
Followers79
Votes0
GitHub Stars221
Forks90

Micro vs Pact: What are the differences?

# Key Differences between Micro and Pact

Microservices architecture has gained popularity due to its flexibility and scalability. Tools like Micro and Pact facilitate the development, testing, and deployment of microservices. Understanding the key differences between them can help in choosing the right tool for a project.

1. **Communication Protocol**: One key difference between Micro and Pact is the communication protocol they use. Micro uses gRPC, which is a high-performance, open-source, universal RPC framework, while Pact uses HTTP for communication between services.

2. **Service Discovery**: In terms of service discovery, Micro provides built-in service discovery using mDNS, DNS-SD, and gRPC. On the other hand, Pact does not offer native service discovery capabilities and relies on existing service discovery solutions.

3. **Contract Testing**: Pact is specifically designed for contract testing between services. It allows teams to define and verify contracts that ensure interoperability between services. Micro, while it supports testing, does not have the same level of focus on contract testing as Pact.

4. **Community Support**: When it comes to community support and documentation, Micro has a larger and more active community, which can be beneficial for developers seeking help or resources. Pact, although popular, may have a smaller community compared to Micro.

5. **Language Support**: Micro is language-agnostic and supports multiple programming languages, making it versatile for different development environments. In contrast, Pact is more language-specific, primarily focusing on supporting languages like Java, Ruby, and JavaScript.

6. **Deployment Mechanism**: Micro provides a seamless experience for deploying and managing microservices using platforms like Kubernetes. While Pact does not offer deployment mechanisms, it can be integrated into existing deployment pipelines for testing contracts.

In Summary, understanding the key differences between Micro and Pact can help in making an informed decision when choosing a tool for developing and testing microservices.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Micro
Micro
Pact
Pact

Micro is a framework for cloud native development. Micro addresses the key requirements for building cloud native services. It leverages the microservices architecture pattern and provides a set of services which act as the building blocks

It is a code-first tool for testing HTTP and message integrations using contract tests. Contract tests assert that inter-application messages conform to a shared understanding that is documented in a contract. Without contract testing, the only way to ensure that applications will work correctly together is by using expensive and brittle integration tests.

Authentication; Config Management; Key-Value Storage; API Gateway; Service Discovery; Event Streaming
Support for JavaScript, JVM, .NET, Python, Go, Ruby, PHP, Swift and more; Get fast, reliable feedback on the compatibility of your integrations; Ensures all your services are compatible with each other before you deploy
Statistics
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Stars
221
GitHub Forks
-
GitHub Forks
90
Stacks
89
Stacks
59
Followers
55
Followers
79
Votes
2
Votes
0
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 1
    Great flexibility
  • 1
    Nice tooling
No community feedback yet
Integrations
No integrations available
JavaScript
JavaScript
Ruby
Ruby
Python
Python
.NET
.NET
Golang
Golang
PHP
PHP
Swift
Swift

What are some alternatives to Micro, Pact?

Postman

Postman

It is the only complete API development environment, used by nearly five million developers and more than 100,000 companies worldwide.

Paw

Paw

Paw is a full-featured and beautifully designed Mac app that makes interaction with REST services delightful. Either you are an API maker or consumer, Paw helps you build HTTP requests, inspect the server's response and even generate client code.

Karate DSL

Karate DSL

Combines API test-automation, mocks and performance-testing into a single, unified framework. The BDD syntax popularized by Cucumber is language-neutral, and easy for even non-programmers. Besides powerful JSON & XML assertions, you can run tests in parallel for speed - which is critical for HTTP API testing.

Appwrite

Appwrite

Appwrite's open-source platform lets you add Auth, DBs, Functions and Storage to your product and build any application at any scale, own your data, and use your preferred coding languages and tools.

Runscope

Runscope

Keep tabs on all aspects of your API's performance with uptime monitoring, integration testing, logging and real-time monitoring.

Istio

Istio

Istio is an open platform for providing a uniform way to integrate microservices, manage traffic flow across microservices, enforce policies and aggregate telemetry data. Istio's control plane provides an abstraction layer over the underlying cluster management platform, such as Kubernetes, Mesos, etc.

Insomnia REST Client

Insomnia REST Client

Insomnia is a powerful REST API Client with cookie management, environment variables, code generation, and authentication for Mac, Window, and Linux.

RAML

RAML

RESTful API Modeling Language (RAML) makes it easy to manage the whole API lifecycle from design to sharing. It's concise - you only write what you need to define - and reusable. It is machine readable API design that is actually human friendly.

Apigee

Apigee

API management, design, analytics, and security are at the heart of modern digital architecture. The Apigee intelligent API platform is a complete solution for moving business to the digital world.

Azure Service Fabric

Azure Service Fabric

Azure Service Fabric is a distributed systems platform that makes it easy to package, deploy, and manage scalable and reliable microservices. Service Fabric addresses the significant challenges in developing and managing cloud apps.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana