StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Container Registry
  4. Container Tools
  5. Portainer vs minikube

Portainer vs minikube

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Portainer
Portainer
Stacks506
Followers842
Votes146
minikube
minikube
Stacks110
Followers262
Votes3
GitHub Stars31.1K
Forks5.1K

Portainer vs minikube: What are the differences?

Introduction

Portainer and minikube are tools used in the field of containerization and Kubernetes management. While both serve the purpose of simplifying the management and deployment of containers, there are key differences between them. This article aims to highlight some of these differences in a concise manner.

  1. Surrounding Infrastructure: Portainer is designed to manage containers and container clusters running on a variety of infrastructures, including standalone machines, virtual machines, and cloud-based platforms. On the other hand, minikube is specifically geared towards managing Kubernetes clusters locally on a single machine or development environment.

  2. Scope of Control: Portainer offers a broader scope of control and management capabilities. It provides an intuitive web interface that allows users to manage not only containers and orchestration platforms but also volumes, networks, and other resources. Minikube, on the other hand, focuses solely on Kubernetes-specific functionalities and management.

  3. User Interface: Portainer's user interface is designed with simplicity in mind, making it accessible to users of all levels of expertise. It offers a graphical interface with visual representations of containers, networks, and other resources. Minikube, on the other hand, is primarily controlled through the command line interface (CLI), requiring users to have a basic understanding of Kubernetes.

  4. Deployment Flexibility: Portainer can be deployed in various ways, including as a standalone container or as a container within an orchestration platform. It can also be installed on different operating systems and cloud platforms. Minikube, on the other hand, is specifically designed for local development and testing, making it less suitable for production environments.

  5. Scope of Coverage: Portainer covers a wide range of container platforms, including Docker, Kubernetes, Swarm, and others. It provides a unified interface for managing multiple platforms. Minikube, on the other hand, is mainly focused on Kubernetes, offering a streamlined experience for managing Kubernetes clusters locally.

  6. Resource Requirements: Portainer requires minimal resources to run and can be deployed on lightweight hardware. Minikube, on the other hand, requires more resources to set up a local Kubernetes cluster, including a virtual machine and a hypervisor.

In summary, Portainer offers a broader scope of control, supports various infrastructures, and provides a simpler user interface, while minikube is designed specifically for local Kubernetes management with a focus on the Kubernetes ecosystem.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Portainer
Portainer
minikube
minikube

It is a universal container management tool. It works with Kubernetes, Docker, Docker Swarm and Azure ACI. It allows you to manage containers without needing to know platform-specific code.

It implements a local Kubernetes cluster on macOS, Linux, and Windows. Its goal is to be the tool for local Kubernetes application development and to support all Kubernetes features that fit.

Docker management; Docker UI; Docker cluster management; Swarm visualizer; Authentication; User Access Control; Docker container management; Docker service management; Docker overview; Docker console; Docker swarm status; Docker image management; Docker network management; Docker dashboard; Remote HTTP API; Automation
Local Kubernetes; LoadBalancer; Multi-cluster
Statistics
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Stars
31.1K
GitHub Forks
-
GitHub Forks
5.1K
Stacks
506
Stacks
110
Followers
842
Followers
262
Votes
146
Votes
3
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 36
    Simple
  • 27
    Great UI
  • 19
    Friendly
  • 12
    Easy to setup, gives a practical interface for Docker
  • 11
    Because it just works, super simple yet powerful
Pros
  • 1
    Let's me test k8s config locally
  • 1
    Easy setup
  • 1
    Can use same yaml config I'll use for prod deployment
Integrations
Docker Swarm
Docker Swarm
Docker Secrets
Docker Secrets
Auth0
Auth0
Kubernetes
Kubernetes
Docker
Docker
Windows
Windows
Linux
Linux
macOS
macOS

What are some alternatives to Portainer, minikube?

Kubernetes

Kubernetes

Kubernetes is an open source orchestration system for Docker containers. It handles scheduling onto nodes in a compute cluster and actively manages workloads to ensure that their state matches the users declared intentions.

Rancher

Rancher

Rancher is an open source container management platform that includes full distributions of Kubernetes, Apache Mesos and Docker Swarm, and makes it simple to operate container clusters on any cloud or infrastructure platform.

Docker Compose

Docker Compose

With Compose, you define a multi-container application in a single file, then spin your application up in a single command which does everything that needs to be done to get it running.

Docker Swarm

Docker Swarm

Swarm serves the standard Docker API, so any tool which already communicates with a Docker daemon can use Swarm to transparently scale to multiple hosts: Dokku, Compose, Krane, Deis, DockerUI, Shipyard, Drone, Jenkins... and, of course, the Docker client itself.

Tutum

Tutum

Tutum lets developers easily manage and run lightweight, portable, self-sufficient containers from any application. AWS-like control, Heroku-like ease. The same container that a developer builds and tests on a laptop can run at scale in Tutum.

Codefresh

Codefresh

Automate and parallelize testing. Codefresh allows teams to spin up on-demand compositions to run unit and integration tests as part of the continuous integration process. Jenkins integration allows more complex pipelines.

CAST.AI

CAST.AI

It is an AI-driven cloud optimization platform for Kubernetes. Instantly cut your cloud bill, prevent downtime, and 10X the power of DevOps.

k3s

k3s

Certified Kubernetes distribution designed for production workloads in unattended, resource-constrained, remote locations or inside IoT appliances. Supports something as small as a Raspberry Pi or as large as an AWS a1.4xlarge 32GiB server.

Flocker

Flocker

Flocker is a data volume manager and multi-host Docker cluster management tool. With it you can control your data using the same tools you use for your stateless applications. This means that you can run your databases, queues and key-value stores in Docker and move them around as easily as the rest of your app.

Kitematic

Kitematic

Simple Docker App management for Mac OS X

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana