StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Utilities
  3. API Tools
  4. API Tools
  5. MockIt (open source) vs Sandbox

MockIt (open source) vs Sandbox

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Sandbox
Sandbox
Stacks28
Followers55
Votes0
GitHub Stars6
Forks5
MockIt (open source)
MockIt (open source)
Stacks0
Followers20
Votes0
GitHub Stars1.6K
Forks83

MockIt (open source) vs Sandbox: What are the differences?

Introduction

When comparing MockIt, an open-source tool, with Sandbox, certain key differences become apparent. Below are six specific differences between the two platforms.

  1. Customization Options: MockIt allows users to have more control over the customization of their mock data, while Sandbox offers preset templates with limited customization capabilities, providing flexibility to users.

  2. Collaboration Features: MockIt lacks advanced collaboration features, whereas Sandbox offers real-time collaboration tools that allow multiple users to work simultaneously on a project, enhancing team productivity.

  3. Integration Capabilities: Sandbox provides seamless integration with various APIs and third-party tools, offering more comprehensive connectivity options compared to MockIt, which may have limited integration capabilities.

  4. Deployment Options: Sandbox offers more deployment options, such as hosting on cloud servers or locally, while MockIt may have restrictions on deployment methods, limiting where and how the mock data can be accessed.

  5. License Restrictions: MockIt being open source, has no restrictions on its usage, while Sandbox may have limitations imposed by its licensing terms, affecting how users can utilize the platform for their projects.

  6. Community Support: MockIt, being open-source, relies on community-driven support for troubleshooting and updates, whereas Sandbox provides dedicated customer support for users, offering more immediate assistance when needed.

In Summary, when comparing MockIt and Sandbox, key differences arise in customization options, collaboration features, integration capabilities, deployment options, license restrictions, and community support.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Sandbox
Sandbox
MockIt (open source)
MockIt (open source)

Quickly mock RESTful API or SOAP web-services with simple or dynamic responses, and fault injection to simulate real application behaviour.

Stop wasting time mocking APIs. MockIt gives you an interface to configure and create REAL mocked end points for your applications.

-
Live reload on server; Quickly create, edit & delete HTTP end-points; CORS enabled; Auth; Quick setup
Statistics
GitHub Stars
6
GitHub Stars
1.6K
GitHub Forks
5
GitHub Forks
83
Stacks
28
Stacks
0
Followers
55
Followers
20
Votes
0
Votes
0
Integrations
Apiary
Apiary
Swagger UI
Swagger UI
RAML
RAML
Docker
Docker
Jest
Jest
React
React
Docusaurus
Docusaurus

What are some alternatives to Sandbox, MockIt (open source)?

Postman

Postman

It is the only complete API development environment, used by nearly five million developers and more than 100,000 companies worldwide.

Paw

Paw

Paw is a full-featured and beautifully designed Mac app that makes interaction with REST services delightful. Either you are an API maker or consumer, Paw helps you build HTTP requests, inspect the server's response and even generate client code.

Karate DSL

Karate DSL

Combines API test-automation, mocks and performance-testing into a single, unified framework. The BDD syntax popularized by Cucumber is language-neutral, and easy for even non-programmers. Besides powerful JSON & XML assertions, you can run tests in parallel for speed - which is critical for HTTP API testing.

Appwrite

Appwrite

Appwrite's open-source platform lets you add Auth, DBs, Functions and Storage to your product and build any application at any scale, own your data, and use your preferred coding languages and tools.

Runscope

Runscope

Keep tabs on all aspects of your API's performance with uptime monitoring, integration testing, logging and real-time monitoring.

Insomnia REST Client

Insomnia REST Client

Insomnia is a powerful REST API Client with cookie management, environment variables, code generation, and authentication for Mac, Window, and Linux.

RAML

RAML

RESTful API Modeling Language (RAML) makes it easy to manage the whole API lifecycle from design to sharing. It's concise - you only write what you need to define - and reusable. It is machine readable API design that is actually human friendly.

Apigee

Apigee

API management, design, analytics, and security are at the heart of modern digital architecture. The Apigee intelligent API platform is a complete solution for moving business to the digital world.

Hoppscotch

Hoppscotch

It is a free, fast and beautiful API request builder. It helps you create requests faster, saving precious time on development

Falcor

Falcor

Falcor lets you represent all your remote data sources as a single domain model via a virtual JSON graph. You code the same way no matter where the data is, whether in memory on the client or over the network on the server.

Related Comparisons

Postman
Swagger UI

Postman vs Swagger UI

Mapbox
Google Maps

Google Maps vs Mapbox

Mapbox
Leaflet

Leaflet vs Mapbox vs OpenLayers

Twilio SendGrid
Mailgun

Mailgun vs Mandrill vs SendGrid

Runscope
Postman

Paw vs Postman vs Runscope