StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Testing Frameworks
  4. Testing Frameworks
  5. Mockito vs NUnit

Mockito vs NUnit

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Mockito
Mockito
Stacks3.6K
Followers180
Votes0
GitHub Stars15.3K
Forks2.6K
NUnit
NUnit
Stacks1.6K
Followers140
Votes0

Mockito vs NUnit: What are the differences?

Introduction: In the world of software testing, Mockito and NUnit are popular tools used for testing Java and .NET applications, respectively. Despite having similar objectives, there are key differences between Mockito and NUnit that are important to understand.

1. Mocking Frameworks: Mockito primarily focuses on mocking Java objects and classes while NUnit is a unit testing framework for .NET applications. As a result, Mockito offers more comprehensive mocking capabilities tailored for Java programming, whereas NUnit is designed specifically for .NET environment.

2. Language Support: Mockito is used for testing Java applications, making it an ideal choice for Java developers. On the other hand, NUnit is specifically built for testing C# and .NET applications, catering to the needs of .NET developers.

3. Syntax and API: The syntax and API of Mockito are Java-centric, reflecting the language-specific conventions and patterns. In contrast, NUnit provides syntax and API that align with C# and .NET standards, ensuring a seamless integration with .NET development tools and workflows.

4. Test Annotations: Mockito relies on Java annotations like @Mock, @Spy, and @InjectMocks for defining and configuring test objects, whereas NUnit utilizes attributes like [Test], [SetUp], [TearDown] to organize and execute test methods within the .NET environment.

5. Assertion Libraries: Mockito does not provide built-in assertion libraries which are commonly used for verifying expected behavior in unit tests, whereas NUnit includes a rich set of assertion libraries such as Assert.AreEqual, Assert.IsTrue, and Assert.IsFalse for performing assertions in .NET unit tests.

6. Integration with IDEs: Mockito integrates seamlessly with popular Java IDEs like Eclipse and IntelliJ IDEA, offering a smooth testing experience within the development environment. On the other hand, NUnit is well-integrated with Visual Studio and other .NET IDEs, providing a convenient testing environment for .NET developers.

Summary: In Summary, understanding the key differences between Mockito and NUnit, such as their language support, mocking frameworks, syntax, assertion libraries, and integration with IDEs, is crucial in selecting the appropriate testing tool for Java and .NET applications.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Mockito
Mockito
NUnit
NUnit

It is a mocking framework that tastes really good. It lets you write beautiful tests with a clean & simple API. It doesn’t give you hangover because the tests are very readable and they produce clean verification errors.

An evolving, open source framework designed for writing and running tests in Microsoft .NET programming languages.It is an aspect of test-driven development , which is part of a larger software design paradigm known as Extreme Programming

Statistics
GitHub Stars
15.3K
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Forks
2.6K
GitHub Forks
-
Stacks
3.6K
Stacks
1.6K
Followers
180
Followers
140
Votes
0
Votes
0

What are some alternatives to Mockito, NUnit?

Robot Framework

Robot Framework

It is a generic test automation framework for acceptance testing and acceptance test-driven development. It has easy-to-use tabular test data syntax and it utilizes the keyword-driven testing approach. Its testing capabilities can be extended by test libraries implemented either with Python or Java, and users can create new higher-level keywords from existing ones using the same syntax that is used for creating test cases.

Karate DSL

Karate DSL

Combines API test-automation, mocks and performance-testing into a single, unified framework. The BDD syntax popularized by Cucumber is language-neutral, and easy for even non-programmers. Besides powerful JSON & XML assertions, you can run tests in parallel for speed - which is critical for HTTP API testing.

Cucumber

Cucumber

Cucumber is a tool that supports Behaviour-Driven Development (BDD) - a software development process that aims to enhance software quality and reduce maintenance costs.

TestCafe

TestCafe

It is a pure node.js end-to-end solution for testing web apps. It takes care of all the stages: starting browsers, running tests, gathering test results and generating reports.

Spock Framework

Spock Framework

It is a testing and specification framework for Java and Groovy applications. What makes it stand out from the crowd is its beautiful and highly expressive specification language. It is compatible with most IDEs, build tools, and continuous integration servers.

Selenide

Selenide

It is a library for writing concise, readable, boilerplate-free tests in Java using Selenium WebDriver.

Capybara

Capybara

Capybara helps you test web applications by simulating how a real user would interact with your app. It is agnostic about the driver running your tests and comes with Rack::Test and Selenium support built in. WebKit is supported through an external gem.

PHPUnit

PHPUnit

PHPUnit is a programmer-oriented testing framework for PHP. It is an instance of the xUnit architecture for unit testing frameworks.

Detox

Detox

High velocity native mobile development requires us to adopt continuous integration workflows, which means our reliance on manual QA has to drop significantly. It tests your mobile app while it's running in a real device/simulator, interacting with it just like a real user.

Imagium

Imagium

Imagium provides AI based visual testing solution for various forms of testing. It makes the job easier for QA Automation, Mobile Testers, DevOps and Compliance teams. Imagium is easy to integrate with any programing language

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana