StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Testing Frameworks
  4. Testing Frameworks
  5. Mockito vs Robot Framework

Mockito vs Robot Framework

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Mockito
Mockito
Stacks3.6K
Followers180
Votes0
GitHub Stars15.3K
Forks2.6K
Robot Framework
Robot Framework
Stacks344
Followers525
Votes120

Mockito vs Robot Framework: What are the differences?

Introduction: When comparing Mockito and Robot Framework, it is essential to understand the key differences between these two widely used testing tools.

  1. Method of Testing: Mockito is a mocking framework that is specifically used for unit testing in Java applications. It is used to create mock objects and stub methods to isolate the code being tested. On the other hand, Robot Framework is a generic test automation framework that allows for acceptance testing and acceptance test-driven development (ATDD). It can be used for testing at different levels such as unit, functional, and acceptance testing.

  2. Programming Language: Mockito is primarily designed for Java projects and works exclusively with Java programming language. It provides mocks, stubs, and spies for Java classes and objects. In contrast, Robot Framework is a test automation framework that supports various programming languages such as Python, Java, and .NET. It allows for cross-language testing and integration.

  3. Testing Approach: Mockito follows the approach of writing test cases using Java code and annotations to create mock objects and verify interactions. It is more focused on unit testing and mocking dependencies. Robot Framework, on the other hand, follows a keyword-driven approach where test cases are written in a tabular format using keywords and test data. It emphasizes readability and collaboration among team members.

  4. Ease of Use: Mockito is known for its simplicity and ease of use within Java projects. It provides a clean and concise API for mocking and verifying interactions. On the contrary, Robot Framework is praised for its high-level test automation capabilities, allowing for easy creation of test cases without the need for extensive programming knowledge. It offers a user-friendly interface for creating and executing test cases.

  5. Integration with Tools: Mockito seamlessly integrates with popular Java development tools and frameworks such as JUnit, TestNG, and Maven to enhance the testing process. It can be easily integrated into existing Java projects for unit testing purposes. Robot Framework, on the other hand, supports integration with various external libraries, databases, and tools through its extensive ecosystem. It allows for integration with Selenium, Appium, and other automation tools for end-to-end testing.

  6. Scope of Testing: Mockito is best suited for developers and testers working on unit testing and mocking scenarios within Java applications. It excels in isolating code components for testing purposes. On the other hand, Robot Framework caters to a broader audience with its support for acceptance testing, web testing, and API testing. It can be used for testing applications across different domains and technologies.

In Summary, Mockito is primarily focused on unit testing in Java applications with a focus on mocking, while Robot Framework is a versatile test automation framework supporting multiple programming languages and testing levels, emphasizing readability and collaboration in testing processes.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Mockito
Mockito
Robot Framework
Robot Framework

It is a mocking framework that tastes really good. It lets you write beautiful tests with a clean & simple API. It doesn’t give you hangover because the tests are very readable and they produce clean verification errors.

It is a generic test automation framework for acceptance testing and acceptance test-driven development. It has easy-to-use tabular test data syntax and it utilizes the keyword-driven testing approach. Its testing capabilities can be extended by test libraries implemented either with Python or Java, and users can create new higher-level keywords from existing ones using the same syntax that is used for creating test cases.

Statistics
GitHub Stars
15.3K
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Forks
2.6K
GitHub Forks
-
Stacks
3.6K
Stacks
344
Followers
180
Followers
525
Votes
0
Votes
120
Pros & Cons
No community feedback yet
Pros
  • 23
    Easy with CI/CD
  • 22
    Open Source
  • 21
    Simple Usage
  • 14
    Easily extendable
  • 13
    Vast Scope more than Front End
Cons
  • 8
    Nested Loops
  • 1
    Mostly for python
  • 1
    Devtooling is not there
  • 0
    Extensive library support
  • 0
    Mobile supports

What are some alternatives to Mockito, Robot Framework?

Karate DSL

Karate DSL

Combines API test-automation, mocks and performance-testing into a single, unified framework. The BDD syntax popularized by Cucumber is language-neutral, and easy for even non-programmers. Besides powerful JSON & XML assertions, you can run tests in parallel for speed - which is critical for HTTP API testing.

Cucumber

Cucumber

Cucumber is a tool that supports Behaviour-Driven Development (BDD) - a software development process that aims to enhance software quality and reduce maintenance costs.

TestCafe

TestCafe

It is a pure node.js end-to-end solution for testing web apps. It takes care of all the stages: starting browsers, running tests, gathering test results and generating reports.

Spock Framework

Spock Framework

It is a testing and specification framework for Java and Groovy applications. What makes it stand out from the crowd is its beautiful and highly expressive specification language. It is compatible with most IDEs, build tools, and continuous integration servers.

Selenide

Selenide

It is a library for writing concise, readable, boilerplate-free tests in Java using Selenium WebDriver.

Capybara

Capybara

Capybara helps you test web applications by simulating how a real user would interact with your app. It is agnostic about the driver running your tests and comes with Rack::Test and Selenium support built in. WebKit is supported through an external gem.

PHPUnit

PHPUnit

PHPUnit is a programmer-oriented testing framework for PHP. It is an instance of the xUnit architecture for unit testing frameworks.

Detox

Detox

High velocity native mobile development requires us to adopt continuous integration workflows, which means our reliance on manual QA has to drop significantly. It tests your mobile app while it's running in a real device/simulator, interacting with it just like a real user.

Imagium

Imagium

Imagium provides AI based visual testing solution for various forms of testing. It makes the job easier for QA Automation, Mobile Testers, DevOps and Compliance teams. Imagium is easy to integrate with any programing language

Codeception

Codeception

Full-stack testing framework for PHP. Run browsers tests, framework tests, APIs tests, unit tests with ease.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana