StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Platform as a Service
  4. Self Hosted Blogging Cms
  5. Modyo vs Strapi

Modyo vs Strapi

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Strapi
Strapi
Stacks720
Followers1.3K
Votes277
GitHub Stars70.2K
Forks9.2K
Modyo
Modyo
Stacks4
Followers8
Votes0

Modyo vs Strapi: What are the differences?

Introduction:

Modyo and Strapi are two popular content management systems, each with its unique features and functionalities. To help you make an informed decision, we have outlined the key differences between Modyo and Strapi below.

1. Cost Structure: Modyo has a subscription-based pricing model, where users pay a monthly fee based on their usage and requirements. On the other hand, Strapi is an open-source CMS, which means that it is free to download and use, with optional paid services for additional features and support.

2. User Interface: Modyo offers a user-friendly, intuitive interface with drag-and-drop functionality, making it easy for non-technical users to create and manage content. Strapi, on the other hand, is more developer-centric, providing a powerful API-based system that allows for greater customization and flexibility but may require more technical expertise to operate.

3. Hosting Options: Modyo is a cloud-based CMS, providing hosting and infrastructure as part of its service, which can simplify setup and maintenance for users. In contrast, Strapi is self-hosted, giving users full control over their hosting environment but also requiring them to handle server setup, maintenance, and security measures.

4. Ecosystem Support: Modyo has a dedicated ecosystem with various plugins, themes, and integrations available to enhance functionality and extend features. Strapi also has a growing community and marketplace for plugins and extensions, allowing users to customize their CMS experience to suit their needs.

5. Scalability: Modyo is designed for scalability and can easily support a large number of users and high traffic volumes without compromising performance. Strapi, being an API-first CMS, offers great scalability by allowing developers to build custom applications and services on top of its robust architecture.

6. Learning Curve: Modyo is known for its user-friendly approach, making it easier for beginners and non-technical users to get started quickly. Strapi, while offering powerful features, may have a steeper learning curve for those without a technical background due to its API-first approach and developer-centric nature.

In Summary, the key differences between Modyo and Strapi lie in their cost structure, user interface, hosting options, ecosystem support, scalability, and learning curve, catering to different user preferences and requirements.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Strapi
Strapi
Modyo
Modyo

Strapi is100% JavaScript, extensible, and fully customizable. It enables developers to build projects faster by providing a customizable API out of the box and giving them the freedom to use the their favorite tools.

It provides a next generation digital experience platform. Use it to build unified digital experiences integrated to your business systems. Accelerate your digital transformation with a portfolio of digital experiences for banking, insurance, customer onboarding and more.

Files structure; Controllers; Filters; Models; Attributes; Relations; Many-to-many; One-to-many; One-to-one; One-way; Lifecycle callbacks; Internationalization; Plugin; Plugin styles; Policies; Global policies; Scoped policies; Plugin policies; Public assets; Requests; Responses; Routing; Role-based access control; Services;
Manage your content for any device in one place; Build the front end digital experience for your institution; Accelerate all your digital teams with Team Review
Statistics
GitHub Stars
70.2K
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Forks
9.2K
GitHub Forks
-
Stacks
720
Stacks
4
Followers
1.3K
Followers
8
Votes
277
Votes
0
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 57
    Free
  • 40
    Open source
  • 28
    Self-hostable
  • 27
    Rapid development
  • 25
    API-based cms
Cons
  • 9
    Can be limiting
  • 8
    Internationalisation
  • 6
    A bit buggy
  • 5
    DB Migrations not seemless
No community feedback yet
Integrations
Twilio SendGrid
Twilio SendGrid
Node.js
Node.js
Ruby
Ruby
PostgreSQL
PostgreSQL
Gatsby
Gatsby
Google App Engine
Google App Engine
Hugo
Hugo
Flask
Flask
Apache Cordova
Apache Cordova
Angular
Angular
No integrations available

What are some alternatives to Strapi, Modyo?

WordPress

WordPress

The core software is built by hundreds of community volunteers, and when you’re ready for more there are thousands of plugins and themes available to transform your site into almost anything you can imagine. Over 60 million people have chosen WordPress to power the place on the web they call “home” — we’d love you to join the family.

Drupal

Drupal

Drupal is an open source content management platform powering millions of websites and applications. It’s built, used, and supported by an active and diverse community of people around the world.

Ghost

Ghost

Ghost is a platform dedicated to one thing: Publishing. It's beautifully designed, completely customisable and completely Open Source. Ghost allows you to write and publish your own blog, giving you the tools to make it easy and even fun to do.

Wagtail

Wagtail

Wagtail is a Django content management system built originally for the Royal College of Art and focused on flexibility and user experience.

OctoberCMS

OctoberCMS

It is a Laravel-based CMS engineered for simplicity. It has a simple and intuitive interface. It provides a consistent structure with an emphasis on reusability so you can focus on building something unique while we handle the boring bits.

Twill

Twill

Twill is an open source CMS toolkit for Laravel that helps developers rapidly create a custom admin console that is intuitive, powerful and flexible.

ProcessWire

ProcessWire

ProcessWire is an open source content management system (CMS) and web application framework aimed at the needs of designers, developers and their clients. ProcessWire gives you more control over your fields, templates and markup than other platforms, and provides a powerful template system that works the way you do

Typo3

Typo3

It is a free and open-source Web content management system written in PHP. It can run on several web servers, such as Apache or IIS, on top of many operating systems, among them Linux, Microsoft Windows, FreeBSD, macOS and OS/2.

Directus

Directus

Let's say you're planning on managing content for a website, native app, and widget. Instead of using a CMS that's baked into the website client, it makes more sense to decouple your content entirely and access it through an API or SDK. That's a headless CMS. That's Directus.

Joomla!

Joomla!

Joomla is a simple and powerful web server application and it requires a server with PHP and either MySQL, PostgreSQL, or SQL Server to run it.

Related Comparisons

HipChat
Slack

HipChat vs Mattermost vs Slack

Litmus
Email on Acid

Email on Acid vs Litmus

InVision
Proto.io

InVision vs Marvel vs Proto.io

Webex
Microsoft Teams

Microsoft Teams vs Webex

Slack
RocketChat

Mattermost vs RocketChat vs Slack