Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
Monaco Editor vs Visual Studio Code: What are the differences?
Introduction:
Monaco Editor and Visual Studio Code are both popular code editors widely used by developers. While both of them have similar features and functionalities, there are some key differences between the two.
1. Syntax Highlighting and IntelliSense:
Monaco Editor provides excellent syntax highlighting and IntelliSense capabilities. It offers a wide range of language support out of the box and provides suggestions, auto-completion, and context-aware code snippets, making it easier for developers to write code efficiently.
Visual Studio Code also provides robust syntax highlighting and IntelliSense features. However, one key difference is that Visual Studio Code supports a larger number of programming languages and offers more advanced IntelliSense options. It also has better support for debugging and code navigation compared to Monaco Editor.
2. Extensibility and Customization:
Visual Studio Code has a strong emphasis on extensibility and customization. It provides a marketplace with a wide variety of extensions that developers can use to enhance their code editing experience. These extensions can add additional features, support for different programming languages, and integration with external tools and services.
Monaco Editor, on the other hand, is designed to be lightweight and embeddable. It lacks the extensive extension ecosystem of Visual Studio Code and does not have the same level of customization options. While it can be customized to some extent, it does not offer the same level of flexibility as Visual Studio Code.
3. Integrated Terminal:
Visual Studio Code comes with an integrated terminal, allowing developers to run commands and scripts directly from the editor. This can be handy for tasks like building, testing, and debugging code without having to switch between different applications.
Monaco Editor, on the other hand, does not have an integrated terminal feature. Developers using Monaco Editor would need to rely on external terminals or command-line interfaces to run commands and scripts.
4. Collaboration and Live Editing:
Monaco Editor has built-in support for collaboration and live editing. It allows multiple users to work on the same file simultaneously, with real-time synchronization of changes. This can be useful for pair programming or remote team collaboration, as it provides a seamless experience for developers to work together on code.
Visual Studio Code, on the other hand, does not have native support for real-time collaboration. While there are extensions available that enable collaboration features, it is not as seamlessly integrated as Monaco Editor's built-in collaboration capabilities.
5. Cloud-based Editing:
Monaco Editor can be used as part of the web-based code editors like Visual Studio Codespaces or GitHub Codespaces. This allows developers to edit code in the cloud without the need for installing any local development environment. It provides a lightweight and accessible way to work on code from anywhere, using just a web browser.
Visual Studio Code, while having some remote development capabilities, primarily relies on being installed locally on a developer's machine. It provides a more comprehensive set of features and integrations for local development scenarios, but does not have the same level of cloud-based editing capabilities as Monaco Editor.
6. Performance and Resource Usage:
Monaco Editor is known for its lightweight and fast performance. It is optimized to handle large codebases and provides a smooth editing experience, even with complex projects. It has a smaller memory footprint compared to Visual Studio Code, making it suitable for scenarios where resource usage needs to be minimized.
Visual Studio Code, on the other hand, is a more feature-rich editor that can consume more system resources, especially when working with large projects. While it provides powerful tools and functionalities, it may require a more powerful machine to ensure smooth performance.
Summary:
In summary, Monaco Editor is a lightweight and embeddable code editor that provides excellent syntax highlighting and IntelliSense capabilities, with built-in support for collaboration and cloud-based editing. Visual Studio Code, on the other hand, offers more extensive customization options, a larger extension ecosystem, integrated terminals, and stronger support for advanced features like debugging and code navigation. Choose Monaco Editor for a lightweight and efficient development experience, or Visual Studio Code for a more customizable and feature-rich editing environment.
Lightweight and versatile. Huge library of extensions that enable you to integrate a host of services to your development environment. VS Code's biggest strength is its library of extensions which enables it to directly compete with every single major IDE for almost all major programming languages.
Visual Studio Code became famous over the past 3+ years I believe. The clean UI, easy to use UX and the plethora of integrations made it a very easy decision for us. Our gripe with Sublime was probably only the UX side. VSCode has not failed us till now, and still is able to support our development env without any significant effort.
Goland being paid, as well as built only for Go seemed like a significant limitation to not consider it.
I decided to choose VSCode over Sublime text for my Systems Programming class in C. What I love about VSCode is its awesome ability to add extensions. Intellisense is a beautiful debugger, and Remote SSH allows me to login and make real-time changes in VSCode to files on my university server. This is an awesome alternative to going back and forth on pushing/pulling code and logging into servers in the terminal. Great choice for anyone interested in C programming!
Pros of Monaco Editor
- Out of the Box Intellisense6
- More features than Ace4
- Power vscode, with all it's features3
- Microsoft Product2
- Accessibility1
- Good support for none-monospace fonts1
Pros of Visual Studio Code
- Powerful multilanguage IDE340
- Fast308
- Front-end develop out of the box193
- Support TypeScript IntelliSense158
- Very basic but free142
- Git integration126
- Intellisense106
- Faster than Atom78
- Better ui, easy plugins, and nice git integration53
- Great Refactoring Tools45
- Good Plugins44
- Terminal42
- Superb markdown support38
- Open Source36
- Extensions35
- Awesome UI26
- Large & up-to-date extension community26
- Powerful and fast24
- Portable22
- Best code editor18
- Best editor18
- Easy to get started with17
- Lots of extensions15
- Good for begginers15
- Crossplatform15
- Built on Electron15
- Extensions for everything14
- Open, cross-platform, fast, monthly updates14
- All Languages Support14
- Easy to use and learn13
- "fast, stable & easy to use"12
- Extensible12
- Ui design is great11
- Totally customizable11
- Git out of the box11
- Useful for begginer11
- Faster edit for slow computer11
- SSH support10
- Great community10
- Fast Startup10
- Works With Almost EveryThing You Need9
- Great language support9
- Powerful Debugger9
- It has terminal and there are lots of shortcuts in it9
- Can compile and run .py files8
- Python extension is fast8
- Features rich7
- Great document formater7
- He is not Michael6
- Extension Echosystem6
- She is not Rachel6
- Awesome multi cursor support6
- VSCode.pro Course makes it easy to learn5
- Language server client5
- SFTP Workspace5
- Very proffesional5
- Easy azure5
- Has better support and more extentions for debugging4
- Supports lots of operating systems4
- Excellent as git difftool and mergetool4
- Virtualenv integration4
- Better autocompletes than Atom3
- Has more than enough languages for any developer3
- 'batteries included'3
- More tools to integrate with vs3
- Emmet preinstalled3
- VS Code Server: Browser version of VS Code2
- CMake support with autocomplete2
- Microsoft2
- Customizable2
- Light2
- Big extension marketplace2
- Fast and ruby is built right in2
- File:///C:/Users/ydemi/Downloads/yuksel_demirkaya_webpa1
Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions
Cons of Monaco Editor
- Microsoft7
Cons of Visual Studio Code
- Slow startup46
- Resource hog at times29
- Poor refactoring20
- Poor UI Designer13
- Weak Ui design tools11
- Poor autocomplete10
- Super Slow8
- Huge cpu usage with few installed extension8
- Microsoft sends telemetry data8
- Poor in PHP7
- It's MicroSoft6
- Poor in Python3
- No Built in Browser Preview3
- No color Intergrator3
- Very basic for java development and buggy at times3
- No built in live Preview3
- Electron3
- Bad Plugin Architecture2
- Powered by Electron2
- Terminal does not identify path vars sometimes1
- Slow C++ Language Server1