Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
MonoDevelop vs Visual Studio Code: What are the differences?
Introduction
In this article, we will compare MonoDevelop and Visual Studio Code, two popular integrated development environments (IDEs) used for software development. We will highlight the key differences between these IDEs.
Installation and platform compatibility: MonoDevelop is primarily developed for Linux and macOS operating systems, while Visual Studio Code is designed to work on Windows, macOS, and Linux. This difference in platform compatibility allows Visual Studio Code to be used on a wider range of operating systems.
Language support: Both MonoDevelop and Visual Studio Code offer support for multiple programming languages. However, Visual Studio Code has a wider range of language extensions and plugins available, making it more versatile for developers working with various programming languages.
Advanced debugging capabilities: Visual Studio Code provides more advanced debugging capabilities compared to MonoDevelop. It offers features like conditional breakpoints, hot code reloading, and support for debugging multiple processes simultaneously. These additional debugging tools in Visual Studio Code make it more efficient for troubleshooting and fixing software issues.
Built-in terminal: Unlike MonoDevelop, Visual Studio Code has a built-in terminal that allows developers to run commands and scripts directly within the IDE. This integrated terminal provides a seamless development experience, enabling developers to execute tasks without leaving the IDE.
Extensibility and customization: Visual Studio Code offers a vast range of extensions and themes that can be easily installed and customized according to the developer's preferences. This extensibility allows developers to enhance the functionality and appearance of the IDE to suit their specific needs. In comparison, MonoDevelop has a more limited selection of extensions and customization options.
Community and ecosystem: Visual Studio Code has a larger and more active community compared to MonoDevelop. This active community contributes to the development of various extensions, plugins, and resources that enhance the overall development experience. The extensive ecosystem around Visual Studio Code provides developers with a wealth of support and resources for their projects.
In summary, Visual Studio Code offers broader platform compatibility, advanced debugging capabilities, a built-in terminal, extensive extensibility, and a larger community and ecosystem compared to MonoDevelop. These factors make Visual Studio Code a more versatile and powerful IDE for software development.
Visual Studio Code became famous over the past 3+ years I believe. The clean UI, easy to use UX and the plethora of integrations made it a very easy decision for us. Our gripe with Sublime was probably only the UX side. VSCode has not failed us till now, and still is able to support our development env without any significant effort.
Goland being paid, as well as built only for Go seemed like a significant limitation to not consider it.
I decided to choose VSCode over Sublime text for my Systems Programming class in C. What I love about VSCode is its awesome ability to add extensions. Intellisense is a beautiful debugger, and Remote SSH allows me to login and make real-time changes in VSCode to files on my university server. This is an awesome alternative to going back and forth on pushing/pulling code and logging into servers in the terminal. Great choice for anyone interested in C programming!
Pros of MonoDevelop
Pros of Visual Studio Code
- Powerful multilanguage IDE340
- Fast308
- Front-end develop out of the box193
- Support TypeScript IntelliSense158
- Very basic but free142
- Git integration126
- Intellisense106
- Faster than Atom78
- Better ui, easy plugins, and nice git integration53
- Great Refactoring Tools45
- Good Plugins44
- Terminal42
- Superb markdown support38
- Open Source36
- Extensions35
- Awesome UI26
- Large & up-to-date extension community26
- Powerful and fast24
- Portable22
- Best code editor18
- Best editor18
- Easy to get started with17
- Lots of extensions15
- Good for begginers15
- Crossplatform15
- Built on Electron15
- Extensions for everything14
- Open, cross-platform, fast, monthly updates14
- All Languages Support14
- Easy to use and learn13
- "fast, stable & easy to use"12
- Extensible12
- Ui design is great11
- Totally customizable11
- Git out of the box11
- Useful for begginer11
- Faster edit for slow computer11
- SSH support10
- Great community10
- Fast Startup10
- Works With Almost EveryThing You Need9
- Great language support9
- Powerful Debugger9
- It has terminal and there are lots of shortcuts in it9
- Can compile and run .py files8
- Python extension is fast8
- Features rich7
- Great document formater7
- He is not Michael6
- Extension Echosystem6
- She is not Rachel6
- Awesome multi cursor support6
- VSCode.pro Course makes it easy to learn5
- Language server client5
- SFTP Workspace5
- Very proffesional5
- Easy azure5
- Has better support and more extentions for debugging4
- Supports lots of operating systems4
- Excellent as git difftool and mergetool4
- Virtualenv integration4
- Better autocompletes than Atom3
- Has more than enough languages for any developer3
- 'batteries included'3
- More tools to integrate with vs3
- Emmet preinstalled3
- VS Code Server: Browser version of VS Code2
- CMake support with autocomplete2
- Microsoft2
- Customizable2
- Light2
- Big extension marketplace2
- Fast and ruby is built right in2
- File:///C:/Users/ydemi/Downloads/yuksel_demirkaya_webpa1
Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions
Cons of MonoDevelop
Cons of Visual Studio Code
- Slow startup46
- Resource hog at times29
- Poor refactoring20
- Poor UI Designer13
- Weak Ui design tools11
- Poor autocomplete10
- Super Slow8
- Huge cpu usage with few installed extension8
- Microsoft sends telemetry data8
- Poor in PHP7
- It's MicroSoft6
- Poor in Python3
- No Built in Browser Preview3
- No color Intergrator3
- Very basic for java development and buggy at times3
- No built in live Preview3
- Electron3
- Bad Plugin Architecture2
- Powered by Electron2
- Terminal does not identify path vars sometimes1
- Slow C++ Language Server1