StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Databases
  4. Big Data Tools
  5. Mule vs StreamSets

Mule vs StreamSets

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Mule runtime engine
Mule runtime engine
Stacks127
Followers129
Votes8
StreamSets
StreamSets
Stacks53
Followers133
Votes0

Mule vs StreamSets: What are the differences?

### Introduction
In this comparison, we will explore the key differences between Mule and StreamSets.

1. **Architecture**: Mule is an integration platform that focuses on API-led connectivity, while StreamSets is a data integration tool designed for efficiently moving data in real-time.
   
2. **Scope**: Mule is primarily used for building APIs, integrations, and process automation, whereas StreamSets is best suited for collecting, processing, and moving data between systems.

3. **Connectivity**: Mule offers a wide range of connectors for integrating with various systems and applications, including databases, services, and protocols. StreamSets provides connectors specifically tailored for data sources, such as databases, cloud services, and data lakes.

4. **Transformation**: Mule provides extensive data transformation capabilities through its Anypoint DataWeave tool, enabling users to format and manipulate data as needed. StreamSets focuses more on data movement and handling rather than complex transformations.

5. **Real-time Processing**: StreamSets shines in real-time data processing scenarios with its data ingestion and transformation pipeline design that allows for processing data streams as they are generated. Mule also supports real-time integrations but may require additional modules for advanced stream processing.

6. **Community Support**: Mule has a large and active community offering a wealth of resources, forums, and plugins for users. StreamSets has a supportive community but may not be as extensive as Mule's.


### Summary
In summary, Mule is ideal for API-led connectivity and process automation, while StreamSets is tailored for efficient real-time data integration and movement. Each platform has its strengths and is well-suited for different types of integration and data processing tasks.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Mule runtime engine
Mule runtime engine
StreamSets
StreamSets

Its mission is to connect the world’s applications, data and devices. It makes connecting anything easy with Anypoint Platform™, the only complete integration platform for SaaS, SOA and APIs. Thousands of organizations in 60 countries, from emerging brands to Global 500 enterprises, use it to innovate faster and gain competitive advantage.

An end-to-end data integration platform to build, run, monitor and manage smart data pipelines that deliver continuous data for DataOps.

Connects data;Connects applications;Integration platform;Fast
Only StreamSets provides a single design experience for all design patterns (batch, streaming, CDC, ETL, ELT, and ML pipelines) for 10x greater developer productivity; smart data pipelines that are resilient to change for 80% less breakages; and a single pane of glass for managing and monitoring all pipelines across hybrid and cloud architectures to eliminate blind spots and control gaps.
Statistics
Stacks
127
Stacks
53
Followers
129
Followers
133
Votes
8
Votes
0
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 4
    Open Source
  • 2
    Microservices
  • 2
    Integration
Cons
  • 2
    No user community
  • 1
    Crashes
Integrations
CloudApp
CloudApp
API Umbrella
API Umbrella
Zapier
Zapier
HBase
HBase
Databricks
Databricks
Amazon Redshift
Amazon Redshift
MySQL
MySQL
gRPC
gRPC
Google BigQuery
Google BigQuery
Amazon Kinesis
Amazon Kinesis
Cassandra
Cassandra
Hadoop
Hadoop
Redis
Redis

What are some alternatives to Mule runtime engine, StreamSets?

Kafka

Kafka

Kafka is a distributed, partitioned, replicated commit log service. It provides the functionality of a messaging system, but with a unique design.

RabbitMQ

RabbitMQ

RabbitMQ gives your applications a common platform to send and receive messages, and your messages a safe place to live until received.

Celery

Celery

Celery is an asynchronous task queue/job queue based on distributed message passing. It is focused on real-time operation, but supports scheduling as well.

Amazon SQS

Amazon SQS

Transmit any volume of data, at any level of throughput, without losing messages or requiring other services to be always available. With SQS, you can offload the administrative burden of operating and scaling a highly available messaging cluster, while paying a low price for only what you use.

NSQ

NSQ

NSQ is a realtime distributed messaging platform designed to operate at scale, handling billions of messages per day. It promotes distributed and decentralized topologies without single points of failure, enabling fault tolerance and high availability coupled with a reliable message delivery guarantee. See features & guarantees.

Apache Spark

Apache Spark

Spark is a fast and general processing engine compatible with Hadoop data. It can run in Hadoop clusters through YARN or Spark's standalone mode, and it can process data in HDFS, HBase, Cassandra, Hive, and any Hadoop InputFormat. It is designed to perform both batch processing (similar to MapReduce) and new workloads like streaming, interactive queries, and machine learning.

ActiveMQ

ActiveMQ

Apache ActiveMQ is fast, supports many Cross Language Clients and Protocols, comes with easy to use Enterprise Integration Patterns and many advanced features while fully supporting JMS 1.1 and J2EE 1.4. Apache ActiveMQ is released under the Apache 2.0 License.

ZeroMQ

ZeroMQ

The 0MQ lightweight messaging kernel is a library which extends the standard socket interfaces with features traditionally provided by specialised messaging middleware products. 0MQ sockets provide an abstraction of asynchronous message queues, multiple messaging patterns, message filtering (subscriptions), seamless access to multiple transport protocols and more.

Presto

Presto

Distributed SQL Query Engine for Big Data

Apache NiFi

Apache NiFi

An easy to use, powerful, and reliable system to process and distribute data. It supports powerful and scalable directed graphs of data routing, transformation, and system mediation logic.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase