StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Utilities
  3. Background Jobs
  4. Background Processing
  5. NGINX Unit vs PHP-FPM

NGINX Unit vs PHP-FPM

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

PHP-FPM
PHP-FPM
Stacks121
Followers119
Votes0
NGINX Unit
NGINX Unit
Stacks86
Followers199
Votes11
GitHub Stars5.6K
Forks365

NGINX Unit vs PHP-FPM: What are the differences?

Introduction

In this article, we will discuss the key differences between NGINX Unit and PHP-FPM.

  1. Scalability: NGINX Unit is designed to be highly scalable, allowing it to handle a high volume of concurrent connections and requests. It uses a multi-process model with worker processes that can be dynamically controlled. On the other hand, PHP-FPM has a fixed number of processes that need to be configured in advance, limiting its scalability.

  2. Configuration: NGINX Unit has a dynamic and flexible configuration system. Its configuration can be modified and updated without requiring a restart of the service, allowing for easier configuration management. PHP-FPM, on the other hand, requires a restart when configuration changes are made.

  3. Language Support: NGINX Unit supports a wide range of programming languages and frameworks, including PHP, Python, Go, Node.js, and more. It provides a unified and consistent interface for different languages. PHP-FPM, on the other hand, is specifically designed for PHP applications, making it more suitable for PHP-specific features and optimizations.

  4. Deployment flexibility: NGINX Unit can be deployed as a standalone application server or as a reverse proxy in front of other application servers. It can handle multiple applications and services simultaneously. PHP-FPM, on the other hand, is typically used as a component of the NGINX web server stack or with other web servers like Apache, limiting its deployment options.

  5. Performance: NGINX Unit is known for its high performance and low resource usage. It is optimized for handling a large number of concurrent connections efficiently. PHP-FPM, on the other hand, can be resource-intensive, especially when there is a high load of PHP requests.

  6. Ease of use: NGINX Unit provides a simple and intuitive API for managing applications, routes, and configurations. It also supports live application updates without service interruption. PHP-FPM, on the other hand, requires more manual configuration and management, making it slightly more complex to set up and maintain.

In summary, NGINX Unit offers superior scalability, flexibility, language support, and performance compared to PHP-FPM. It provides a unified platform for managing various applications and services with ease and efficiency.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

PHP-FPM
PHP-FPM
NGINX Unit
NGINX Unit

It is an alternative PHP FastCGI implementation with some additional features useful for sites of any size, especially busier sites. It includes Adaptive process spawning, Advanced process management with graceful stop/start, Emergency restart in case of accidental opcode cache destruction etc.

NGINX Unit is a dynamic web application server, designed to run applications in multiple languages. Unit is lightweight, polyglot, and dynamically configured via API. The design of the server allows reconfiguration of specific application parameters as needed by the engineering or operations.

-
Fully dynamic reconfiguration using RESTful JSON API;Multiple application languages and versions can run simultaneously;Dynamic application processes management (coming soon);TLS support (coming soon);TCP, HTTP, HTTPS, HTTP/2 routing and proxying (coming soon)
Statistics
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Stars
5.6K
GitHub Forks
-
GitHub Forks
365
Stacks
121
Stacks
86
Followers
119
Followers
199
Votes
0
Votes
11
Pros & Cons
No community feedback yet
Pros
  • 3
    PHP
  • 2
    Golang
  • 2
    Multilang
  • 2
    Python
  • 1
    Ruby
Integrations
No integrations available
Perl
Perl
Python
Python
Golang
Golang
PHP
PHP
Ruby
Ruby

What are some alternatives to PHP-FPM, NGINX Unit?

NGINX

NGINX

nginx [engine x] is an HTTP and reverse proxy server, as well as a mail proxy server, written by Igor Sysoev. According to Netcraft nginx served or proxied 30.46% of the top million busiest sites in Jan 2018.

Apache HTTP Server

Apache HTTP Server

The Apache HTTP Server is a powerful and flexible HTTP/1.1 compliant web server. Originally designed as a replacement for the NCSA HTTP Server, it has grown to be the most popular web server on the Internet.

Sidekiq

Sidekiq

Sidekiq uses threads to handle many jobs at the same time in the same process. It does not require Rails but will integrate tightly with Rails 3/4 to make background processing dead simple.

Unicorn

Unicorn

Unicorn is an HTTP server for Rack applications designed to only serve fast clients on low-latency, high-bandwidth connections and take advantage of features in Unix/Unix-like kernels. Slow clients should only be served by placing a reverse proxy capable of fully buffering both the the request and response in between Unicorn and slow clients.

Microsoft IIS

Microsoft IIS

Internet Information Services (IIS) for Windows Server is a flexible, secure and manageable Web server for hosting anything on the Web. From media streaming to web applications, IIS's scalable and open architecture is ready to handle the most demanding tasks.

Apache Tomcat

Apache Tomcat

Apache Tomcat powers numerous large-scale, mission-critical web applications across a diverse range of industries and organizations.

Passenger

Passenger

Phusion Passenger is a web server and application server, designed to be fast, robust and lightweight. It takes a lot of complexity out of deploying web apps, adds powerful enterprise-grade features that are useful in production, and makes administration much easier and less complex.

Gunicorn

Gunicorn

Gunicorn is a pre-fork worker model ported from Ruby's Unicorn project. The Gunicorn server is broadly compatible with various web frameworks, simply implemented, light on server resources, and fairly speedy.

Beanstalkd

Beanstalkd

Beanstalks's interface is generic, but was originally designed for reducing the latency of page views in high-volume web applications by running time-consuming tasks asynchronously.

Jetty

Jetty

Jetty is used in a wide variety of projects and products, both in development and production. Jetty can be easily embedded in devices, tools, frameworks, application servers, and clusters. See the Jetty Powered page for more uses of Jetty.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase