Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
PHP-FPM vs nginx: What are the differences?
Introduction
PHP-FPM and nginx are both important components in web servers. Understanding their key differences can help in choosing the right setup for websites and applications.
Execution Model: PHP-FPM is a process manager for PHP which handles PHP script execution and management of workers. It communicates with the web server (like nginx) using FastCGI protocol. On the other hand, nginx is a high-performance web server and reverse proxy server that can also act as an HTTP cache. It can handle static content efficiently and can also forward dynamic requests to PHP-FPM.
Architecture: PHP-FPM follows a pool or worker model where multiple dedicated worker processes handle incoming PHP requests. Each worker process can handle multiple requests simultaneously using threads or processes. On the other hand, nginx uses an asynchronous and event-driven architecture where a single master process handles all incoming requests efficiently without blocking multiple connections.
Resource Handling: PHP-FPM primarily handles PHP scripting and processing, including database connections, session management, and application logic. It depends on the web server (like nginx) to handle static file requests efficiently. Nginx, on the other hand, excels at serving static files due to its efficient architecture. It can handle static content without the need to involve PHP-FPM for processing.
Load Balancing: PHP-FPM supports load balancing by using multiple worker processes. It can distribute requests across different PHP-FPM instances, ensuring efficient resource utilization and increased performance. Nginx also supports load balancing, but at a higher level. It can distribute requests to backend servers (including PHP-FPM instances) using various load balancing algorithms like round-robin, IP-hash, etc.
Caching: PHP-FPM does not provide built-in caching mechanisms. However, it can integrate with other caching solutions like Varnish or a Content Delivery Network (CDN) to improve performance. Nginx, on the other hand, includes a built-in caching module that can cache responses from dynamic requests. It can cache content in memory, on disk, or even on a distributed cache server like Redis.
Configuration and Extensibility: PHP-FPM configuration involves settings related to PHP execution, process management, and resource limits. It can be tweaked to achieve optimal performance based on specific application requirements. Nginx provides rich configuration options for customizing server behavior, handling server blocks, SSL/TLS settings, and more. It also supports various modules for additional functionality like URL rewriting, gzip compression, rate limiting, and more.
In summary, PHP-FPM is responsible for executing PHP scripts and managing worker processes, while nginx acts as a powerful web server, reverse proxy, and can handle static content efficiently. PHP-FPM excels at processing PHP requests, while nginx is effective at serving static files and load-balancing requests. Both technologies have their strengths and can be used together to achieve high-performance web applications.
I am diving into web development, both front and back end. I feel comfortable with administration, scripting and moderate coding in bash, Python and C++, but I am also a Windows fan (i love inner conflict). What are the votes on web servers? IIS is expensive and restrictive (has Windows adoption of open source changed this?) Apache has the history but seems to be at the root of most of my Infosec issues, and I know nothing about nginx (is it too new to rely on?). And no, I don't know what I want to do on the web explicitly, but hosting and data storage (both cloud and tape) are possibilities. Ready, aim fire!
I would pick nginx over both IIS and Apace HTTP Server any day. Combine it with docker, and as you grow maybe even traefik, and you'll have a really flexible solution for serving http content where you can take sites and projects up and down without effort, easily move it between systems and dont have to handle any dependencies on your actual local machine.
From a StackShare Community member: "We are a LAMP shop currently focused on improving web performance for our customers. We have made many front-end optimizations and now we are considering replacing Apache with nginx. I was wondering if others saw a noticeable performance gain or any other benefits by switching."
I use nginx because it is very light weight. Where Apache tries to include everything in the web server, nginx opts to have external programs/facilities take care of that so the web server can focus on efficiently serving web pages. While this can seem inefficient, it limits the number of new bugs found in the web server, which is the element that faces the client most directly.
I use nginx because its more flexible and easy to configure
I use Apache HTTP Server because it's intuitive, comprehensive, well-documented, and just works
Pros of NGINX
- High-performance http server1.4K
- Performance894
- Easy to configure730
- Open source607
- Load balancer530
- Free289
- Scalability288
- Web server226
- Simplicity175
- Easy setup136
- Content caching30
- Web Accelerator21
- Capability15
- Fast14
- High-latency12
- Predictability12
- Reverse Proxy8
- The best of them7
- Supports http/27
- Great Community5
- Lots of Modules5
- Enterprise version5
- High perfomance proxy server4
- Embedded Lua scripting3
- Streaming media delivery3
- Streaming media3
- Reversy Proxy3
- Blash2
- GRPC-Web2
- Lightweight2
- Fast and easy to set up2
- Slim2
- saltstack2
- Virtual hosting1
- Narrow focus. Easy to configure. Fast1
- Along with Redis Cache its the Most superior1
- Ingress controller1
Pros of PHP-FPM
Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions
Cons of NGINX
- Advanced features require subscription10