StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Platform as a Service
  4. Web Servers
  5. XAMPP vs nginx

XAMPP vs nginx

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

NGINX
NGINX
Stacks115.0K
Followers61.9K
Votes5.5K
GitHub Stars28.4K
Forks7.6K
XAMPP
XAMPP
Stacks142
Followers272
Votes6

XAMPP vs nginx: What are the differences?

XAMPP and nginx are both popular web server software options. Let's explore the key differences between them.

  1. Architecture: XAMPP is a web server solution that integrates Apache, MySQL, PHP, and Perl into a single package, making it easy to set up and use for local web development. On the other hand, nginx is a lightweight web server and reverse proxy server designed to deliver high performance and handle a large number of concurrent connections efficiently. It uses an event-driven architecture and is known for its scalability and efficiency.

  2. Performance: nginx is renowned for its exceptional performance, especially when it comes to handling a high number of concurrent connections with minimal resource usage. Its event-driven architecture allows it to handle multiple requests efficiently. XAMPP, on the other hand, though suitable for local web development, may not offer the same scalability and optimal performance as nginx in high-traffic production environments.

  3. Security: Both XAMPP and nginx offer security features, but nginx has earned a reputation for its robust security capabilities. It has various built-in security features and modules that can protect against common web server vulnerabilities and attacks. XAMPP, being primarily focused on local development, may require additional configuration and security measures to ensure appropriate protection in a production environment.

  4. Ease of Use: XAMPP is designed to be user-friendly and easy to set up, making it an excellent option for developers who require a local server for development purposes. It provides a simple interface that allows users to start and stop the server easily. On the other hand, nginx, while not as straightforward to set up as XAMPP, offers more control and customization options due to its extensive configuration capabilities.

  5. Platform Support: XAMPP is available for Windows, macOS, Linux, and Solaris, making it accessible to a wide range of users on different operating systems. On the other hand, nginx has native support for Linux and also offers versions for Windows and macOS, ensuring cross-platform compatibility. This difference in platform support may influence the choice of web server based on the specific operating system requirements.

  6. Community and Documentation: Both XAMPP and nginx have active communities and extensive documentation resources. However, due to the widespread use of nginx in production environments, it has a larger and more active community, which means there are more online resources, forums, and community support available for addressing issues and finding solutions.

In summary, XAMPP is a comprehensive web server solution suitable for local development purposes, while nginx is a high-performance web server and reverse proxy server commonly used in production environments. Nginx offers excellent scalability and performance, robust security features, extensive customization options, and broader community support compared to XAMPP.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on NGINX, XAMPP

greg00m
greg00m

Mar 9, 2020

Needs advice

I am diving into web development, both front and back end. I feel comfortable with administration, scripting and moderate coding in bash, Python and C++, but I am also a Windows fan (i love inner conflict). What are the votes on web servers? IIS is expensive and restrictive (has Windows adoption of open source changed this?) Apache has the history but seems to be at the root of most of my Infosec issues, and I know nothing about nginx (is it too new to rely on?). And no, I don't know what I want to do on the web explicitly, but hosting and data storage (both cloud and tape) are possibilities.
Ready, aim fire!

766k views766k
Comments
jlp78
jlp78

May 31, 2019

ReviewonNGINXNGINX

I use nginx because it is very light weight. Where Apache tries to include everything in the web server, nginx opts to have external programs/facilities take care of that so the web server can focus on efficiently serving web pages. While this can seem inefficient, it limits the number of new bugs found in the web server, which is the element that faces the client most directly.

727k views727k
Comments
StackShare
StackShare

May 29, 2019

Needs advice

From a StackShare Community member: "We are a LAMP shop currently focused on improving web performance for our customers. We have made many front-end optimizations and now we are considering replacing Apache with nginx. I was wondering if others saw a noticeable performance gain or any other benefits by switching."

725k views725k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

NGINX
NGINX
XAMPP
XAMPP

nginx [engine x] is an HTTP and reverse proxy server, as well as a mail proxy server, written by Igor Sysoev. According to Netcraft nginx served or proxied 30.46% of the top million busiest sites in Jan 2018.

It consists mainly of the Apache HTTP Server, MariaDB database, and interpreters for scripts written in the PHP and Perl programming languages.

Statistics
GitHub Stars
28.4K
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Forks
7.6K
GitHub Forks
-
Stacks
115.0K
Stacks
142
Followers
61.9K
Followers
272
Votes
5.5K
Votes
6
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 1453
    High-performance http server
  • 895
    Performance
  • 730
    Easy to configure
  • 607
    Open source
  • 530
    Load balancer
Cons
  • 10
    Advanced features require subscription
Pros
  • 6
    Easy set up and installation of files

What are some alternatives to NGINX, XAMPP?

Apache HTTP Server

Apache HTTP Server

The Apache HTTP Server is a powerful and flexible HTTP/1.1 compliant web server. Originally designed as a replacement for the NCSA HTTP Server, it has grown to be the most popular web server on the Internet.

Unicorn

Unicorn

Unicorn is an HTTP server for Rack applications designed to only serve fast clients on low-latency, high-bandwidth connections and take advantage of features in Unix/Unix-like kernels. Slow clients should only be served by placing a reverse proxy capable of fully buffering both the the request and response in between Unicorn and slow clients.

Microsoft IIS

Microsoft IIS

Internet Information Services (IIS) for Windows Server is a flexible, secure and manageable Web server for hosting anything on the Web. From media streaming to web applications, IIS's scalable and open architecture is ready to handle the most demanding tasks.

Apache Tomcat

Apache Tomcat

Apache Tomcat powers numerous large-scale, mission-critical web applications across a diverse range of industries and organizations.

Passenger

Passenger

Phusion Passenger is a web server and application server, designed to be fast, robust and lightweight. It takes a lot of complexity out of deploying web apps, adds powerful enterprise-grade features that are useful in production, and makes administration much easier and less complex.

Gunicorn

Gunicorn

Gunicorn is a pre-fork worker model ported from Ruby's Unicorn project. The Gunicorn server is broadly compatible with various web frameworks, simply implemented, light on server resources, and fairly speedy.

Jetty

Jetty

Jetty is used in a wide variety of projects and products, both in development and production. Jetty can be easily embedded in devices, tools, frameworks, application servers, and clusters. See the Jetty Powered page for more uses of Jetty.

lighttpd

lighttpd

lighttpd has a very low memory footprint compared to other webservers and takes care of cpu-load. Its advanced feature-set (FastCGI, CGI, Auth, Output-Compression, URL-Rewriting and many more) make lighttpd the perfect webserver-software for every server that suffers load problems.

Swoole

Swoole

It is an open source high-performance network framework using an event-driven, asynchronous, non-blocking I/O model which makes it scalable and efficient.

Puma

Puma

Unlike other Ruby Webservers, Puma was built for speed and parallelism. Puma is a small library that provides a very fast and concurrent HTTP 1.1 server for Ruby web applications.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase