StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Monitoring
  4. Monitoring Tools
  5. Observium vs Zabbix

Observium vs Zabbix

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Zabbix
Zabbix
Stacks684
Followers981
Votes66
GitHub Stars5.3K
Forks1.1K
Observium
Observium
Stacks18
Followers58
Votes1

Observium vs Zabbix: What are the differences?

Introduction

Observium and Zabbix are both network monitoring tools that provide valuable insight into the performance and availability of network devices. While they share similar goals, there are key differences that set them apart.

  1. Ease of Use: Observium shines in terms of ease of use, providing a straightforward and user-friendly interface. Its emphasis on simplicity makes it an excellent choice for small to medium-sized networks. On the other hand, Zabbix offers more comprehensive features and customization options, but it requires a steeper learning curve.

  2. Scalability: Zabbix is particularly suitable for large-scale environments due to its ability to monitor thousands of devices simultaneously. It boasts a distributed architecture and supports multiple monitoring agents, making it highly scalable. Observium, while still scalable, might face limitations in handling large networks and may require additional resources.

  3. Alerting and Notification: Zabbix excels in providing advanced alerting and notification features. It supports various alerting methods, including email, SMS, and mobile push notifications. Observium, although it offers basic alerting capabilities, may require third-party integrations or additional configurations for more advanced notifications.

  4. Device Support: Observium focuses primarily on network devices, making it an ideal choice for network administrators. It provides extensive support for network equipment manufacturers, including Cisco, Juniper, and HP. In contrast, Zabbix offers broader support for different types of devices, such as servers, applications, and virtual machines, making it more versatile for monitoring various aspects of an IT infrastructure.

  5. Community and Documentation: Zabbix benefits from a large and active community, contributing to regular updates, numerous integrations, and extensive documentation. This vibrant community ensures quick bug fixes, feature enhancements, and reliable support. Observium, while featuring an active community, may have a slightly smaller user base, resulting in fewer available resources and community-driven plugins.

  6. Pricing and Licensing: Observium provides a free community edition, but its full version requires a commercial license. Zabbix, on the other hand, is fully open-source, allowing users to benefit from all its features without any licensing fees. This difference in licensing models can be a critical factor for organizations with strict budget constraints.

In Summary, Observium and Zabbix differ in terms of ease of use, scalability, alerting and notification capabilities, device support, community and documentation, as well as pricing and licensing models. Choosing between the two depends on the specific needs and requirements of the network monitoring project.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Zabbix, Observium

vivek
vivek

Jun 8, 2020

Needs adviceonCentreonCentreonZabbixZabbixDatadogDatadog

My team is divided on using Centreon or Zabbix for enterprise monitoring and alert automation. Can someone let us know which one is better? There is one more tool called Datadog that we are using for cloud assets. Of course, Datadog presents us with huge bills. So we want to have a comparative study. Suggestions and advice are welcome. Thanks!

795k views795k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Zabbix
Zabbix
Observium
Observium

Zabbix is a mature and effortless enterprise-class open source monitoring solution for network monitoring and application monitoring of millions of metrics.

It is a low-maintenance auto-discovering network monitoring platform supporting a wide range of device types, platforms and operating systems

Smart, Highly Automated Metric Collection; Advanced Problem Detection; Intelligent Alerting and Remediation
Simple and intuitive interface ;Threshold, State and Syslog Alerting; Rule-based automatic grouping
Statistics
GitHub Stars
5.3K
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Forks
1.1K
GitHub Forks
-
Stacks
684
Stacks
18
Followers
981
Followers
58
Votes
66
Votes
1
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 21
    Free
  • 9
    Alerts
  • 5
    Service/node/network discovery
  • 5
    Templates
  • 4
    Base metrics from the box
Cons
  • 5
    The UI is in PHP
  • 2
    Puppet module is sluggish
Pros
  • 1
    Modern Graphs
Integrations
Slack
Slack
Jira
Jira
PagerDuty
PagerDuty
Grafana
Grafana
Ansible
Ansible
Skype
Skype
Chef
Chef
Bugzilla
Bugzilla
HipChat
HipChat
ServiceNow.com
ServiceNow.com
Windows
Windows
Linux
Linux
FreeBSD
FreeBSD
Debian
Debian

What are some alternatives to Zabbix, Observium?

Grafana

Grafana

Grafana is a general purpose dashboard and graph composer. It's focused on providing rich ways to visualize time series metrics, mainly though graphs but supports other ways to visualize data through a pluggable panel architecture. It currently has rich support for for Graphite, InfluxDB and OpenTSDB. But supports other data sources via plugins.

Kibana

Kibana

Kibana is an open source (Apache Licensed), browser based analytics and search dashboard for Elasticsearch. Kibana is a snap to setup and start using. Kibana strives to be easy to get started with, while also being flexible and powerful, just like Elasticsearch.

Prometheus

Prometheus

Prometheus is a systems and service monitoring system. It collects metrics from configured targets at given intervals, evaluates rule expressions, displays the results, and can trigger alerts if some condition is observed to be true.

Nagios

Nagios

Nagios is a host/service/network monitoring program written in C and released under the GNU General Public License.

Netdata

Netdata

Netdata collects metrics per second & presents them in low-latency dashboards. It's designed to run on all of your physical & virtual servers, cloud deployments, Kubernetes clusters & edge/IoT devices, to monitor systems, containers & apps

Sensu

Sensu

Sensu is the future-proof solution for multi-cloud monitoring at scale. The Sensu monitoring event pipeline empowers businesses to automate their monitoring workflows and gain deep visibility into their multi-cloud environments.

Graphite

Graphite

Graphite does two things: 1) Store numeric time-series data and 2) Render graphs of this data on demand

Lumigo

Lumigo

Lumigo is an observability platform built for developers, unifying distributed tracing with payload data, log management, and real-time metrics to help you deeply understand and troubleshoot your systems.

StatsD

StatsD

It is a network daemon that runs on the Node.js platform and listens for statistics, like counters and timers, sent over UDP or TCP and sends aggregates to one or more pluggable backend services (e.g., Graphite).

Jaeger

Jaeger

Jaeger, a Distributed Tracing System

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana