Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
OctoberCMS vs Pagekit: What are the differences?
What is OctoberCMS? Open-source, self-hosted CMS platform based on the Laravel PHP Framework. October is a Content Management System (CMS) and web platform whose sole purpose is to make your development workflow simple again. We feel building websites has become a convoluted and confusing process that leaves developers unsatisfied, we want to turn you around to the simpler side and get back to basics.
What is Pagekit? A modular and lightweight CMS built with Symfony components. Pagekit gives you the tools to create beautiful websites. No matter if it's a simple blog, your company's website or a web service. Pagekit has a modular and extendable architecture and is built on top of Symfony components and modern open source libraries.
OctoberCMS and Pagekit can be categorized as "Self-Hosted Blogging / CMS" tools.
Some of the features offered by OctoberCMS are:
- Page Components
- Extensible Platform
- Simple AJAX Framework
On the other hand, Pagekit provides the following key features:
- Responsive Design
- Blog
- Users & Permissions
"Get back to basics" is the top reason why over 13 developers like OctoberCMS, while over 5 developers mention "Intuitive ui" as the leading cause for choosing Pagekit.
OctoberCMS and Pagekit are both open source tools. It seems that OctoberCMS with 8.69K GitHub stars and 1.96K forks on GitHub has more adoption than Pagekit with 5.15K GitHub stars and 608 GitHub forks.
Pros of OctoberCMS
- Get back to basics21
- Highly customizable17
- Open-source, decent documentation15
- Laravel based12
- Easy to use12
- Production ready high speed backend development11
- Perfect frontend developer tool9
- Configurable backend5
- Perfect backend UI5
- Great community2
Pros of Pagekit
- Intuitive ui6
- Basic features baked-in4
- Gourgeous cms !! php in his maximum expression3
- Fast to learn and easy to expand1
Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions
Cons of OctoberCMS
- Expensive recurring licence cost2
- Closed source2