StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Utilities
  3. Security
  4. Security
  5. OpenSSL vs Spring Security

OpenSSL vs Spring Security

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

OpenSSL
OpenSSL
Stacks13.5K
Followers7.1K
Votes0
Spring Security
Spring Security
Stacks559
Followers589
Votes6
GitHub Stars9.4K
Forks6.2K

OpenSSL vs Spring Security: What are the differences?

Introduction

In this article, we will discuss the key differences between OpenSSL and Spring Security.

  1. Encryption Algorithms: OpenSSL is a cryptography library that provides various encryption algorithms like DES, AES, RSA, etc. It allows developers to implement custom encryption schemes and protocols. On the other hand, Spring Security is a framework that focuses on securing Java applications. It provides support for encryption algorithms like AES, Blowfish, and RSA, but it does not offer as many options as OpenSSL.

  2. SSL/TLS Support: OpenSSL is widely used for implementing SSL/TLS protocols. It provides robust support for SSL/TLS versions and various cipher suites. Spring Security has built-in support for SSL/TLS protocols as well, but it relies on the underlying Java Secure Socket Extension (JSSE) implementation for SSL/TLS functionalities.

  3. Integration with Frameworks: OpenSSL is a standalone library that can be integrated with various programming languages and frameworks. It is commonly used with C, C++, and other programming languages. Spring Security, on the other hand, is specifically designed for Java applications and integrates seamlessly with the Spring Framework.

  4. Authentication and Authorization: Spring Security provides a comprehensive authentication and authorization framework for Java applications. It supports various authentication mechanisms like form-based authentication, LDAP, and OAuth. While OpenSSL can be used for encryption and digital certificate processing, it does not provide built-in support for authentication and authorization mechanisms.

  5. Platform Independence: OpenSSL is developed in C programming language and is platform-independent. It can be compiled and executed across different operating systems. Spring Security is a Java-based framework and relies on the Java Virtual Machine (JVM) for execution. It can run on any platform that supports Java.

  6. Community Support: OpenSSL has a large and active community of developers contributing to its development and providing support. It is widely used and has been around for a long time. Spring Security also has a strong community backing and is actively maintained by the Spring team. However, compared to OpenSSL, the community support and resources available for Spring Security may be relatively smaller.

In summary, OpenSSL is a standalone cryptography library with extensive encryption algorithm support and SSL/TLS protocol implementation. It can be integrated with various programming languages and frameworks. Spring Security, on the other hand, is a Java-based framework designed for securing Java applications. It provides authentication and authorization mechanisms along with support for SSL/TLS protocols.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on OpenSSL, Spring Security

sindhujasrivastava
sindhujasrivastava

Jan 16, 2020

Needs advice

I am working on building a platform in my company that will provide a single sign on to all of the internal products to the customer. To do that we need to build an Authorisation server to comply with the OIDC protocol. Earlier we had built the Auth server using the Spring Security OAuth project but since in Spring Security 5.x it is no longer supported we are planning to get over with it as well. Below are the 2 options that I was considering to replace the Spring Auth Server.

  1. Keycloak
  2. Okta
  3. Auth0 Please advise which one to use.
258k views258k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

OpenSSL
OpenSSL
Spring Security
Spring Security

It is a robust, commercial-grade, and full-featured toolkit for the Transport Layer Security (TLS) and Secure Sockets Layer (SSL) protocols. It is also a general-purpose cryptography library.

It is a framework that focuses on providing both authentication and authorization to Java applications. The real power of Spring Security is found in how easily it can be extended to meet custom requirements.

Robust;Commercial-grade;Transport Layer Security ;General-purpose cryptography library;QUIC;Post-quantum cryptography
Comprehensive; Servlet API integration; Protection against attacks
Statistics
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Stars
9.4K
GitHub Forks
-
GitHub Forks
6.2K
Stacks
13.5K
Stacks
559
Followers
7.1K
Followers
589
Votes
0
Votes
6
Pros & Cons
No community feedback yet
Pros
  • 3
    Easy to use
  • 3
    Java integration
Integrations
Linux
Linux
Mac OS X
Mac OS X
Android OS
Android OS
Windows
Windows
Spring Boot
Spring Boot
Spring MVC
Spring MVC

What are some alternatives to OpenSSL, Spring Security?

Auth0

Auth0

A set of unified APIs and tools that instantly enables Single Sign On and user management to all your applications.

Stormpath

Stormpath

Stormpath is an authentication and user management service that helps development teams quickly and securely build web and mobile applications and services.

Keycloak

Keycloak

It is an Open Source Identity and Access Management For Modern Applications and Services. It adds authentication to applications and secure services with minimum fuss. No need to deal with storing users or authenticating users. It's all available out of the box.

Let's Encrypt

Let's Encrypt

It is a free, automated, and open certificate authority brought to you by the non-profit Internet Security Research Group (ISRG).

Devise

Devise

Devise is a flexible authentication solution for Rails based on Warden

Firebase Authentication

Firebase Authentication

It provides backend services, easy-to-use SDKs, and ready-made UI libraries to authenticate users to your app. It supports authentication using passwords, phone numbers, popular federated identity providers like Google,

Sqreen

Sqreen

Sqreen is a security platform that helps engineering team protect their web applications, API and micro-services in real-time. The solution installs with a simple application library and doesn't require engineering resources to operate. Security anomalies triggered are reported with technical context to help engineers fix the code. Ops team can assess the impact of attacks and monitor suspicious user accounts involved.

Instant 2FA

Instant 2FA

Add a powerful, simple and flexible 2FA verification view to your login flow, without making any DB changes and just 3 API calls.

Amazon Cognito

Amazon Cognito

You can create unique identities for your users through a number of public login providers (Amazon, Facebook, and Google) and also support unauthenticated guests. You can save app data locally on users’ devices allowing your applications to work even when the devices are offline.

WorkOS

WorkOS

Start selling to enterprise customers with just a few lines of code.

Related Comparisons

Postman
Swagger UI

Postman vs Swagger UI

Mapbox
Google Maps

Google Maps vs Mapbox

Mapbox
Leaflet

Leaflet vs Mapbox vs OpenLayers

Twilio SendGrid
Mailgun

Mailgun vs Mandrill vs SendGrid

Runscope
Postman

Paw vs Postman vs Runscope