OpenStack vs TeamCity

Overview

OpenStack

Stacks790

Followers1.2K

Votes138

TeamCity

Stacks1.2K

Followers1.1K

Votes316

OpenStack vs TeamCity: What are the differences?

OpenStack vs TeamCity

Deployment and Infrastructure Management: OpenStack is primarily used for managing cloud computing infrastructure, providing services like compute, storage, and networking resources. On the other hand, TeamCity is a continuous integration and deployment tool that focuses on automating the build and release processes of software development projects.
Scale and Scope: OpenStack is designed to scale and cater to large-scale cloud infrastructure needs, allowing users to manage a vast number of virtual machines and resources. TeamCity, on the other hand, is more focused on providing a centralized platform for continuous integration and deployment pipelines within software development teams.
Open Source vs Commercial Software: OpenStack is an open-source project, meaning it is freely available for anyone to use and modify according to their requirements. TeamCity, on the other hand, is a commercial product developed by JetBrains, which offers additional features and support for organizations willing to invest in a CI/CD solution.
Feature Set: OpenStack offers a wide range of features for cloud management, including identity management, image storage, and orchestration capabilities through services like Nova, Cinder, and Heat. In contrast, TeamCity offers features such as build pipelines, test reporting, and integration with version control systems like Git and Mercurial.
Integration and Extensibility: OpenStack provides a flexible and extensible framework that allows users to integrate with various third-party tools and services to enhance their cloud environment. TeamCity also supports integration with a wide range of tools and plugins, making it easy to customize the CI/CD workflows according to the project requirements.
Target Users: OpenStack is more suited for organizations looking to build and manage their private or public cloud infrastructure, providing a high level of control and customization. TeamCity, on the other hand, is aimed at software development teams and organizations seeking to streamline their build and deployment processes through automation and collaboration tools.

In Summary, the key differences between OpenStack and TeamCity lie in their focus on infrastructure management vs CI/CD, scale and scope, open-source vs commercial nature, feature set, integration capabilities, and target user base.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Detailed Comparison

OpenStack	TeamCity
OpenStack is a cloud operating system that controls large pools of compute, storage, and networking resources throughout a datacenter, all managed through a dashboard that gives administrators control while empowering their users to provision resources through a web interface.	TeamCity is a user-friendly continuous integration (CI) server for professional developers, build engineers, and DevOps. It is trivial to setup and absolutely free for small teams and open source projects.
Compute;Storage;Networking;Dashboard;Shared Services	Automate code analyzing, compiling, and testing processes, with having instant feedback on build progress, problems, and test failures, all in a simple, intuitive web-interface; Simplified setup: create projects from just a VCS repository URL;Run multiple builds and tests under different configurations and platforms simultaneously; Make sure your team sustains an uninterrupted workflow with the help of Pretested commits and Personal builds; Have build history insight with customizable statistics on build duration, success rate, code quality, and custom metrics; Enable cost-effective on-demand build infrastructure scaling thanks to tight integration with Amazon EC2; Easily extend TeamCity functionality and add new integrations using Java API; Great visual project representation. Track any changes made by any user in the system, filter projects and choose style of visual change status representation;
Statistics
Stacks 790	Stacks 1.2K
Followers 1.2K	Followers 1.1K
Votes 138	Votes 316
Pros & Cons
Pros 60 Private cloud 39 Avoid vendor lock-in 23 Flexible in use 7 Industry leader 5 Robust architecture	Pros 61 Easy to configure 37 Reliable and high-quality 32 On premise 32 User friendly 32 Github integration Cons 3 High costs for more than three build agents 2 User-friendly 2 User friendly 2 Proprietary
Integrations
No integrations available	Slack

What are some alternatives to OpenStack, TeamCity?

Jenkins

In a nutshell Jenkins CI is the leading open-source continuous integration server. Built with Java, it provides over 300 plugins to support building and testing virtually any project.

Travis CI

Free for open source projects, our CI environment provides multiple runtimes (e.g. Node.js or PHP versions), data stores and so on. Because of this, hosting your project on travis-ci.com means you can effortlessly test your library or applications against multiple runtimes and data stores without even having all of them installed locally.

Codeship

Codeship runs your automated tests and configured deployment when you push to your repository. It takes care of managing and scaling the infrastructure so that you are able to test and release more frequently and get faster feedback for building the product your users need.

CircleCI

Continuous integration and delivery platform helps software teams rapidly release code with confidence by automating the build, test, and deploy process. Offers a modern software development platform that lets teams ramp.

Drone.io

Drone is a hosted continuous integration service. It enables you to conveniently set up projects to automatically build, test, and deploy as you make changes to your code. Drone integrates seamlessly with Github, Bitbucket and Google Code as well as third party services such as Heroku, Dotcloud, Google AppEngine and more.

wercker

Wercker is a CI/CD developer automation platform designed for Microservices & Container Architecture.

GoCD

GoCD is an open source continuous delivery server created by ThoughtWorks. GoCD offers business a first-class build and deployment engine for complete control and visibility.

Shippable

Shippable is a SaaS platform that lets you easily add Continuous Integration/Deployment to your Github and BitBucket repositories. It is lightweight, super simple to setup, and runs your builds and tests faster than any other service.

Buildkite

CI and build automation tool that combines the power of your own build infrastructure with the convenience of a managed, centralized web UI. Used by Shopify, Basecamp, Digital Ocean, Venmo, Cochlear, Bugsnag and more.

Snap CI

Snap CI is a cloud-based continuous integration & continuous deployment tool with powerful deployment pipelines. Integrates seamlessly with GitHub and provides fast feedback so you can deploy with ease.

Related Comparisons

OpenStack vs TeamCity: What are the differences?

OpenStack vs TeamCity

Deployment and Infrastructure Management: OpenStack is primarily used for managing cloud computing infrastructure, providing services like compute, storage, and networking resources. On the other hand, TeamCity is a continuous integration and deployment tool that focuses on automating the build and release processes of software development projects.
Scale and Scope: OpenStack is designed to scale and cater to large-scale cloud infrastructure needs, allowing users to manage a vast number of virtual machines and resources. TeamCity, on the other hand, is more focused on providing a centralized platform for continuous integration and deployment pipelines within software development teams.
Open Source vs Commercial Software: OpenStack is an open-source project, meaning it is freely available for anyone to use and modify according to their requirements. TeamCity, on the other hand, is a commercial product developed by JetBrains, which offers additional features and support for organizations willing to invest in a CI/CD solution.
Feature Set: OpenStack offers a wide range of features for cloud management, including identity management, image storage, and orchestration capabilities through services like Nova, Cinder, and Heat. In contrast, TeamCity offers features such as build pipelines, test reporting, and integration with version control systems like Git and Mercurial.
Integration and Extensibility: OpenStack provides a flexible and extensible framework that allows users to integrate with various third-party tools and services to enhance their cloud environment. TeamCity also supports integration with a wide range of tools and plugins, making it easy to customize the CI/CD workflows according to the project requirements.
Target Users: OpenStack is more suited for organizations looking to build and manage their private or public cloud infrastructure, providing a high level of control and customization. TeamCity, on the other hand, is aimed at software development teams and organizations seeking to streamline their build and deployment processes through automation and collaboration tools.

OpenStack vs TeamCity

Overview