ORY Hydra vs WSO2 Identity Server

Overview

ORY Hydra

Stacks23

Followers157

Votes8

GitHub Stars16.6K

Forks1.6K

WSO2 Identity Server

Stacks26

Followers81

Votes3

GitHub Stars825

Forks928

ORY Hydra vs WSO2 Identity Server: What are the differences?

Introduction

ORY Hydra and WSO2 Identity Server are both widely used identity and access management (IAM) solutions. While they share certain similarities, there are some key differences between the two.

Architecture: ORY Hydra follows a microservices architecture, where each component is decoupled and independently scalable. On the other hand, WSO2 Identity Server follows a monolithic architecture, where all the components are tightly coupled. This modular nature of ORY Hydra makes it more flexible and easier to maintain.
Open Source: ORY Hydra is a fully open-source IAM solution, whereas WSO2 Identity Server has both open-source and enterprise versions. The open-source nature of ORY Hydra allows users to customize and extend its functionality to suit their specific needs without any vendor lock-in.
OAuth 2.0 and OpenID Connect Support: Both ORY Hydra and WSO2 Identity Server support OAuth 2.0 and OpenID Connect protocols for securing APIs and managing user identities. However, ORY Hydra focuses solely on these protocols, providing a lightweight and specialized solution, whereas WSO2 Identity Server offers a broader range of IAM features such as Single Sign-On (SSO), multi-factor authentication, and user provisioning.
Scalability: ORY Hydra is designed to be highly scalable, capable of handling millions of users and requests. It can be easily deployed in a distributed setup, allowing horizontal scaling. On the other hand, WSO2 Identity Server may face scalability limitations due to its monolithic architecture, making it more suitable for smaller-scale deployments.
User Interface: WSO2 Identity Server provides a comprehensive web-based user interface (UI) for managing and configuring IAM functionalities. In contrast, ORY Hydra primarily focuses on providing APIs and relies on external UI components for user management and configuration. This design choice makes ORY Hydra a more developer-centric solution and allows for greater UI flexibility.
Community and Support: ORY Hydra has a growing community of developers and contributors who actively support and enhance the project. The open-source nature of ORY Hydra encourages community-driven innovation and provides users with a vibrant ecosystem. WSO2 Identity Server, being an enterprise solution, offers dedicated technical support, professional services, and a wider range of integration options with other WSO2 products.

In summary, ORY Hydra and WSO2 Identity Server differ in terms of their architecture, open-source nature, protocol support, scalability, user interface, and community support. ORY Hydra provides a flexible and lightweight IAM solution with specialized focus on OAuth 2.0 and OpenID Connect, while WSO2 Identity Server offers a more comprehensive feature set, professional support, and a user-friendly interface for broader IAM needs.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Detailed Comparison

ORY Hydra	WSO2 Identity Server
It is a self-managed server that secures access to your applications and APIs with OAuth 2.0 and OpenID Connect. It is OpenID Connect Certified and optimized for latency, high throughput, and low resource consumption.	It helps you do single sign-on and identity federation backed by strong and adaptive authentication, securely expose APIs, and manage identities by connecting to heterogeneous user stores. Leverage the power of open-source IAM in your enterprise to innovate fast and build secure Customer IAM (CIAM) solutions to provide an experience your users will love.
OAuth 2.0 Authorization Server;OpenID Connect certified;Flexible User Management;High Performance;Developer Friendly	Single Sign on (SSO); Identity Federation; Strong and Adaptive Authentication ; Account management and provisioning ; Access Control ; API and Microservices security ; Identity Analytics
Statistics
GitHub Stars 16.6K	GitHub Stars 825
GitHub Forks 1.6K	GitHub Forks 928
Stacks 23	Stacks 26
Followers 157	Followers 81
Votes 8	Votes 3
Pros & Cons
Pros 4 Open-source 2 Scalable 2 Fully customizable	Pros 1 It's a open source solution 1 OpenID and SAML support 1 Supports multiple identity provider
Integrations
ORY Kratos Docker Node.js JavaScript TypeScript Golang Ruby Python Java PHP	OAuth.io OpenID Connect

What are some alternatives to ORY Hydra, WSO2 Identity Server?

Auth0

A set of unified APIs and tools that instantly enables Single Sign On and user management to all your applications.

Stormpath

Stormpath is an authentication and user management service that helps development teams quickly and securely build web and mobile applications and services.

Keycloak

It is an Open Source Identity and Access Management For Modern Applications and Services. It adds authentication to applications and secure services with minimum fuss. No need to deal with storing users or authenticating users. It's all available out of the box.

Let's Encrypt

It is a free, automated, and open certificate authority brought to you by the non-profit Internet Security Research Group (ISRG).

Devise

Devise is a flexible authentication solution for Rails based on Warden

Firebase Authentication

It provides backend services, easy-to-use SDKs, and ready-made UI libraries to authenticate users to your app. It supports authentication using passwords, phone numbers, popular federated identity providers like Google,

Sqreen

Sqreen is a security platform that helps engineering team protect their web applications, API and micro-services in real-time. The solution installs with a simple application library and doesn't require engineering resources to operate. Security anomalies triggered are reported with technical context to help engineers fix the code. Ops team can assess the impact of attacks and monitor suspicious user accounts involved.

Instant 2FA

Add a powerful, simple and flexible 2FA verification view to your login flow, without making any DB changes and just 3 API calls.

Amazon Cognito

You can create unique identities for your users through a number of public login providers (Amazon, Facebook, and Google) and also support unauthenticated guests. You can save app data locally on users’ devices allowing your applications to work even when the devices are offline.

WorkOS

Start selling to enterprise customers with just a few lines of code.

Related Comparisons

ORY Hydra vs WSO2 Identity Server: What are the differences?

Introduction

ORY Hydra and WSO2 Identity Server are both widely used identity and access management (IAM) solutions. While they share certain similarities, there are some key differences between the two.

Architecture: ORY Hydra follows a microservices architecture, where each component is decoupled and independently scalable. On the other hand, WSO2 Identity Server follows a monolithic architecture, where all the components are tightly coupled. This modular nature of ORY Hydra makes it more flexible and easier to maintain.
Open Source: ORY Hydra is a fully open-source IAM solution, whereas WSO2 Identity Server has both open-source and enterprise versions. The open-source nature of ORY Hydra allows users to customize and extend its functionality to suit their specific needs without any vendor lock-in.
OAuth 2.0 and OpenID Connect Support: Both ORY Hydra and WSO2 Identity Server support OAuth 2.0 and OpenID Connect protocols for securing APIs and managing user identities. However, ORY Hydra focuses solely on these protocols, providing a lightweight and specialized solution, whereas WSO2 Identity Server offers a broader range of IAM features such as Single Sign-On (SSO), multi-factor authentication, and user provisioning.
Scalability: ORY Hydra is designed to be highly scalable, capable of handling millions of users and requests. It can be easily deployed in a distributed setup, allowing horizontal scaling. On the other hand, WSO2 Identity Server may face scalability limitations due to its monolithic architecture, making it more suitable for smaller-scale deployments.
User Interface: WSO2 Identity Server provides a comprehensive web-based user interface (UI) for managing and configuring IAM functionalities. In contrast, ORY Hydra primarily focuses on providing APIs and relies on external UI components for user management and configuration. This design choice makes ORY Hydra a more developer-centric solution and allows for greater UI flexibility.
Community and Support: ORY Hydra has a growing community of developers and contributors who actively support and enhance the project. The open-source nature of ORY Hydra encourages community-driven innovation and provides users with a vibrant ecosystem. WSO2 Identity Server, being an enterprise solution, offers dedicated technical support, professional services, and a wider range of integration options with other WSO2 products.

ORY Hydra vs WSO2 Identity Server

Overview

ORY Hydra vs WSO2 Identity Server: What are the differences?