StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Utilities
  3. Security
  4. Security
  5. Ossec vs Snort

Ossec vs Snort

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Ossec
Ossec
Stacks48
Followers188
Votes0
Snort
Snort
Stacks36
Followers104
Votes0
GitHub Stars3.1K
Forks640

Ossec vs Snort: What are the differences?

Introduction:

Here, we will discuss the key differences between Ossec and Snort. Ossec and Snort are two popular open-source Intrusion Detection Systems (IDS), but they offer different functionalities and features.

  1. Flexibility of Use: Ossec is a multi-platform IDS that can be installed on various operating systems such as Windows, Linux, and macOS. On the other hand, Snort is primarily designed for Linux and UNIX systems, making it slightly less flexible in terms of platform compatibility.

  2. Detection Methodology: Ossec uses a host-based intrusion detection approach, where it monitors the log files, system files, and other system events to detect potential intrusions. On the contrary, Snort is a network-based IDS that analyzes network traffic in real-time to identify suspicious activities and intrusions.

  3. Correlation and Analysis: Ossec focuses on correlation and analysis of various log files and alerts generated by different systems within the network, providing a holistic view of the security situation. In contrast, Snort primarily focuses on real-time analysis and generation of alerts for network-based threats, without extensive correlation and analysis capabilities.

  4. Architecture and Scalability: Ossec follows a client-server architecture, where agents are installed on individual systems and send logs to a centralized server for analysis. This architecture allows for greater scalability and centralized management of security alerts. On the other hand, Snort follows a standalone sensor-based architecture, where each sensor analyzes network traffic independently, making it less scalable for large-scale deployments.

  5. Rule-Based Detection: Snort relies heavily on rules-based detection, where predefined rules are used to detect known attack patterns. It can be highly effective against known threats but may struggle with detecting new or unknown threats. In comparison, Ossec utilizes a combination of rule-based and anomaly-based detection techniques, allowing it to detect both known and unknown attacks based on abnormal behavior.

  6. Integration with SIEM Systems: Ossec has built-in functionality for integration with Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) systems, allowing it to actively contribute to the overall security monitoring and incident response workflows. Snort, although it can be integrated with SIEM systems, lacks the native support and features for seamless integration, requiring additional configuration and setup.

In Summary, Ossec and Snort differ in terms of their flexibility of use, detection methodology, correlation and analysis capabilities, architecture and scalability, rule-based detection approach, and integration with SIEM systems.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Ossec
Ossec
Snort
Snort

It is a free, open-source host-based intrusion detection system. It performs log analysis, integrity checking, registry monitoring, rootkit detection, time-based alerting, and active response.

It is an open-source, free and lightweight network intrusion detection system (NIDS) software for Linux and Windows to detect emerging threats.

Open Source HIDS; Multiplatform HIDS; PCI Compliance
Intrusion Agent; IPSx; IPS; NGIPS; IPS detection and blocking
Statistics
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Stars
3.1K
GitHub Forks
-
GitHub Forks
640
Stacks
48
Stacks
36
Followers
188
Followers
104
Votes
0
Votes
0
Integrations
Windows
Windows
Linux
Linux
macOS
macOS
Windows
Windows
FreeBSD
FreeBSD
CentOS
CentOS
Fedora
Fedora

What are some alternatives to Ossec, Snort?

Let's Encrypt

Let's Encrypt

It is a free, automated, and open certificate authority brought to you by the non-profit Internet Security Research Group (ISRG).

Sqreen

Sqreen

Sqreen is a security platform that helps engineering team protect their web applications, API and micro-services in real-time. The solution installs with a simple application library and doesn't require engineering resources to operate. Security anomalies triggered are reported with technical context to help engineers fix the code. Ops team can assess the impact of attacks and monitor suspicious user accounts involved.

Instant 2FA

Instant 2FA

Add a powerful, simple and flexible 2FA verification view to your login flow, without making any DB changes and just 3 API calls.

Riemann

Riemann

Riemann aggregates events from your servers and applications with a powerful stream processing language. Send an email for every exception in your app. Track the latency distribution of your web app. See the top processes on any host, by memory and CPU.

ORY Hydra

ORY Hydra

It is a self-managed server that secures access to your applications and APIs with OAuth 2.0 and OpenID Connect. It is OpenID Connect Certified and optimized for latency, high throughput, and low resource consumption.

Virgil Security

Virgil Security

Virgil consists of an open-source encryption library, which implements CMS and ECIES(including RSA schema), a Key Management API, and a cloud-based Key Management Service.

ExpeditedSSL

ExpeditedSSL

Stop pouring through MAN pages and outdated blog posts that don't take into account new requirements. With our add-on, you can go from install to confirmed installation in as little as twenty minutes: using nothing but your browser.

Clef

Clef

Clef is secure two-factor — built for consumers. Easy to use, integrate, and pay for.

Wazuh

Wazuh

It is a free, open source and enterprise-ready security monitoring solution for threat detection, integrity monitoring, incident response and compliance.

Packetbeat

Packetbeat

Packetbeat agents sniff the traffic between your application processes, parse on the fly protocols like HTTP, MySQL, Postgresql or REDIS and correlate the messages into transactions.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

Postman
Swagger UI

Postman vs Swagger UI

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp