Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
Metricbeat vs Packetbeat: What are the differences?
# Introduction
Key differences between Metricbeat and Packetbeat:
1. **Data Type Monitored**:
Metricbeat collects system-level metrics, while Packetbeat focuses on network traffic monitoring.
2. **Metrics vs Packets**:
Metricbeat collects numeric data metrics like CPU usage, memory consumption, and disk utilization, while Packetbeat captures and analyzes actual network packets allowing for deep network traffic insights.
3. **Application Focus**:
Metricbeat is more focused on monitoring infrastructure metrics for systems and applications, while Packetbeat is specifically geared towards network traffic analysis for troubleshooting and security purposes.
4. **Protocols Supported**:
Metricbeat typically supports collecting metrics from various platforms like Docker, Apache, MySQL, and others, whereas Packetbeat focuses on capturing, decoding, and analyzing data from protocols like HTTP, DNS, MySQL, etc.
5. **Granularity of Data**:
Metricbeat provides aggregated metrics about the system and applications, while Packetbeat offers detailed insights into network traffic capturing individual packets and their contents.
6. **Use Cases**:
Metricbeat is commonly used for infrastructure monitoring, performance analysis, and capacity planning, while Packetbeat is utilized for network troubleshooting, identifying application performance issues, and detecting security threats in real-time.
In Summary, Metricbeat and Packetbeat differ in the type of data monitored, focus on metrics vs packets, supported protocols, granularity of data, application focus, and use cases.
Hi, We have a situation, where we are using Prometheus to get system metrics from PCF (Pivotal Cloud Foundry) platform. We send that as time-series data to Cortex via a Prometheus server and built a dashboard using Grafana. There is another pipeline where we need to read metrics from a Linux server using Metricbeat, CPU, memory, and Disk. That will be sent to Elasticsearch and Grafana will pull and show the data in a dashboard.
Is it OK to use Metricbeat for Linux server or can we use Prometheus?
What is the difference in system metrics sent by Metricbeat and Prometheus node exporters?
Regards, Sunil.
If you're already using Prometheus for your system metrics, then it seems like standing up Elasticsearch just for Linux host monitoring is excessive. The node_exporter is probably sufficient if you'e looking for standard system metrics.
Another thing to consider is that Metricbeat / ELK use a push model for metrics delivery, whereas Prometheus pulls metrics from each node it is monitoring. Depending on how you manage your network security, opting for one solution over two may make things simpler.
Hi Sunil! Unfortunately, I don´t have much experience with Metricbeat so I can´t advise on the diffs with Prometheus...for Linux server, I encourage you to use Prometheus node exporter and for PCF, I would recommend using the instana tile (https://www.instana.com/supported-technologies/pivotal-cloud-foundry/). Let me know if you have further questions! Regards Jose
Pros of Metricbeat
- Simple2
- Easy to setup1
Pros of Packetbeat
- Easy setup2
- Works well with ELK stack2