StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Testing Frameworks
  4. Browser Testing
  5. Panther vs Rainforest QA

Panther vs Rainforest QA

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Rainforest QA
Rainforest QA
Stacks37
Followers68
Votes53
Panther
Panther
Stacks6
Followers12
Votes0
GitHub Stars3.0K
Forks233

Panther vs Rainforest QA: What are the differences?

## Key Differences Between Panther and Rainforest QA

<Provide intro here>

1. **Product Type**: Panther primarily focuses on security testing, offering specialized tools for penetration testing, vulnerability assessments, and security audits. On the other hand, Rainforest QA is a platform for functional testing, providing services for automated regression testing, manual testing, and test case management.
   
2. **Pricing Model**: Panther follows a subscription-based pricing model, where users pay a fixed fee for a set period of time, usually annually or monthly. In contrast, Rainforest QA is usage-based, where customers are billed according to the number of test cycles executed or the time spent on testing activities.

3. **Integration Capabilities**: Panther offers seamless integration with popular security tools and platforms such as Burp Suite, Metasploit, and Nessus to enhance the testing process. Rainforest QA, on the other hand, integrates with various development and project management tools like Jira, Slack, and GitHub, focusing on aligning testing activities with the overall software development workflow.

4. **Scope of Testing**: Panther specializes in testing the security aspects of web applications, APIs, and networks, with a strong emphasis on identifying and mitigating vulnerabilities and cyber threats. In comparison, Rainforest QA concentrates on functional testing across web and mobile applications, ensuring that the software meets user requirements and operates smoothly.

5. **Reporting and Analytics**: Panther provides in-depth reports on security findings, detailed vulnerability assessments, and actionable recommendations to strengthen the security posture of the tested systems. Rainforest QA emphasizes on detailed test reports, metrics on test coverage, and insights to improve testing efficiency, helping teams make data-driven decisions for quality assurance.

6. **Support and Training**: Panther offers personalized support from security experts, training programs on ethical hacking techniques, and resources to enhance the cybersecurity skills of users. Rainforest QA provides extensive documentation, tutorials, and customer support for onboarding and troubleshooting, focusing on improving the testing proficiency of teams.

In Summary, Panther and Rainforest QA differ in their focus on security vs. functional testing, pricing model, integration capabilities, scope of testing, reporting and analytics, and support and training.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Rainforest QA
Rainforest QA
Panther
Panther

Rainforest gives you the reliability of a QA team and the speed of automation, without the hassle of managing a team or the pain of writing automated tests.

It is a convenient standalone library to scrape websites and to run end-to-end tests using real browsers.

Infinitely Scalable, On-Demand QA Team; Cross Browser Testing; Regression, Functional, and Exploratory Testing; Super Fast Results; Test results direct to your Inbox; Support Powered by Engineers; Integrates with your Chat and Bug trackers; Works with Continuous Deployment
Executes the JavaScript code contained in webpages; Supports everything that Chrome (or Firefox) implements; Allows screenshots taking; Can wait for asynchronously loaded elements to show up; Lets you run your own JS code or XPath queries in the context of the loaded page; Supports custom Selenium server installations; Supports remote browser testing services including SauceLabs and BrowserStack
Statistics
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Stars
3.0K
GitHub Forks
-
GitHub Forks
233
Stacks
37
Stacks
6
Followers
68
Followers
12
Votes
53
Votes
0
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 13
    Cross-browser testing
  • 7
    QA
  • 7
    Powerful API
  • 7
    Super-simple test creation
  • 6
    Easy way to get real front-end smoke tests
No community feedback yet
Integrations
Slack
Slack
Codeship
Codeship
Pivotal Tracker
Pivotal Tracker
HipChat
HipChat
CircleCI
CircleCI
Jira
Jira
PHP
PHP
Symfony
Symfony
JavaScript
JavaScript
Firefox
Firefox
Google Chrome
Google Chrome

What are some alternatives to Rainforest QA, Panther?

BrowserStack

BrowserStack

BrowserStack is the leading test platform built for developers & QAs to expand test coverage, scale & optimize testing with cross-browser, real device cloud, accessibility, visual testing, test management, and test observability.

Selenium

Selenium

Selenium automates browsers. That's it! What you do with that power is entirely up to you. Primarily, it is for automating web applications for testing purposes, but is certainly not limited to just that. Boring web-based administration tasks can (and should!) also be automated as well.

Sauce Labs

Sauce Labs

Cloud-based automated testing platform enables developers and QEs to perform functional, JavaScript unit, and manual tests with Selenium or Appium on web and mobile apps. Videos and screenshots for easy debugging. Secure and CI-ready.

LambdaTest

LambdaTest

LambdaTest platform provides secure, scalable and insightful test orchestration for website, and mobile app testing. Customers at different points in their DevOps lifecycle can leverage Automation and/or Manual testing on LambdaTest.

Karma

Karma

Karma is not a testing framework, nor an assertion library. Karma just launches a HTTP server, and generates the test runner HTML file you probably already know from your favourite testing framework. So for testing purposes you can use pretty much anything you like.

Playwright

Playwright

It is a Node library to automate the Chromium, WebKit and Firefox browsers with a single API. It enables cross-browser web automation that is ever-green, capable, reliable and fast.

WebdriverIO

WebdriverIO

WebdriverIO lets you control a browser or a mobile application with just a few lines of code. Your test code will look simple, concise and easy to read.

import.io

import.io

import.io is a free web-based platform that puts the power of the machine readable web in your hands. Using our tools you can create an API or crawl an entire website in a fraction of the time of traditional methods, no coding required.

TestingBot

TestingBot

TestingBot provides automated and Manual cross browser testing in the cloud. Make sure your website looks ok in all browsers.

Ghost Inspector

Ghost Inspector

It lets you create and manage UI tests that check specific functionality in your website or application. We execute these automated browser tests continuously from the cloud and alert you if anything breaks.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana