StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Testing Frameworks
  4. Testing Frameworks
  5. PHPUnit vs PhpSpec

PHPUnit vs PhpSpec

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

PHPUnit
PHPUnit
Stacks2.8K
Followers287
Votes14
GitHub Stars20.0K
Forks2.2K
PhpSpec
PhpSpec
Stacks540
Followers25
Votes3

PHPUnit vs PhpSpec: What are the differences?

Introduction

In this article, we will discuss the key differences between PHPUnit and PhpSpec, which are both popular testing frameworks in PHP.

  1. Unit Testing vs Behavior Driven Development (BDD): PHPUnit is primarily designed for unit testing, which focuses on testing individual units of code in isolation. It emphasizes verifying the correctness of individual functions or methods. PhpSpec, on the other hand, follows the principles of Behavior Driven Development (BDD). It puts more emphasis on describing the desired behavior of a system through examples and specifications, rather than testing individual units of code. PhpSpec encourages a more high-level approach to testing, allowing for better collaboration between developers and stakeholders.

  2. Syntax and Structure: PHPUnit uses assertion-style syntax, where tests are typically written using assert functions to check expected outcomes. It provides a wide range of assertion functions for different types of tests. PhpSpec, on the other hand, uses a more descriptive syntax called "specifications." Specifications are written in a more natural language format, allowing for better readability and understanding of the code's behavior. PhpSpec encourages developers to focus on describing the expected behavior rather than writing assert statements.

  3. Test Generation Approach: PHPUnit generally requires developers to write tests manually. Developers need to create test methods and assertions for each unit they want to test. In contrast, PhpSpec follows a different approach. It generates tests automatically based on specifications that developers write. Developers only need to define specifications for the classes and methods they want to test, and PhpSpec will generate the corresponding tests. This approach helps developers focus more on the system's behavior rather than explicit test implementation.

  4. Test Organization: PHPUnit organizes tests into test classes and test methods following a hierarchical structure. Developers define test classes for different units of code and create test methods within those classes to test specific functionalities. PhpSpec, on the other hand, organizes tests in a more hierarchical manner. Instead of test classes, PhpSpec uses separate specification classes to describe the behavior of individual units. Each specification class focuses on one specific class or method, providing a clear separation of concerns and easier maintenance.

  5. Mocking and Stubbing: PHPUnit provides comprehensive mocking and stubbing capabilities, allowing developers to create mock objects and stub methods to isolate dependencies during testing. It provides a rich set of mocking libraries and methods to simulate complex scenarios. PhpSpec, however, has limited support for mocking and stubbing. It encourages developers to focus on describing the behavior of the system rather than using mocks extensively. This means that developers using PhpSpec may need to rely on other mocking libraries if advanced mocking capabilities are required.

  6. Speed and Performance: Due to its focus on unit testing, PHPUnit generally performs testing at a lower level and is considered to be faster than PhpSpec. PHPUnit allows for more fine-grained control over the test execution and has optimizations for running tests quickly. PhpSpec, being more high-level, may involve additional overhead in test generation and execution. However, the difference in speed and performance may vary depending on the specific use case and the complexity of the code being tested.

In Summary, PHPUnit is a unit testing framework that emphasizes testing individual code units in isolation, while PhpSpec follows the principles of Behavior Driven Development (BDD) and focuses on describing the behavior of a system through examples and specifications. PHPUnit uses assertion-style syntax and requires manual test creation, while PhpSpec uses a more descriptive syntax and generates tests based on specifications. PHPUnit provides comprehensive mocking and stubbing capabilities, while PhpSpec has limited support for mocking. Both frameworks differ in test organization and have differences in speed and performance.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

PHPUnit
PHPUnit
PhpSpec
PhpSpec

PHPUnit is a programmer-oriented testing framework for PHP. It is an instance of the xUnit architecture for unit testing frameworks.

It is a tool which can help you write clean and working PHP code using behaviour driven development or BDD. BDD is a technique derived from test-first development.

-
Specification-oriented BDD framework; write clean and working PHP code
Statistics
GitHub Stars
20.0K
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Forks
2.2K
GitHub Forks
-
Stacks
2.8K
Stacks
540
Followers
287
Followers
25
Votes
14
Votes
3
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 5
    TDD Unit Testing
  • 2
    Software Quality
  • 2
    TDD Integration Testing
  • 2
    TDD Acceptance Testing
  • 1
    Unit Testing
Cons
  • 1
    Mocked services require more effort and understanding
Pros
  • 1
    BDD Unit Testing
  • 1
    Mocked dependant services by default
  • 1
    Better for code optimisation (BDD over TDD)
Cons
  • 1
    Less support; devs are more used to PHP Unit
Integrations
No integrations available
Laravel
Laravel
PHP
PHP

What are some alternatives to PHPUnit, PhpSpec?

Robot Framework

Robot Framework

It is a generic test automation framework for acceptance testing and acceptance test-driven development. It has easy-to-use tabular test data syntax and it utilizes the keyword-driven testing approach. Its testing capabilities can be extended by test libraries implemented either with Python or Java, and users can create new higher-level keywords from existing ones using the same syntax that is used for creating test cases.

Karate DSL

Karate DSL

Combines API test-automation, mocks and performance-testing into a single, unified framework. The BDD syntax popularized by Cucumber is language-neutral, and easy for even non-programmers. Besides powerful JSON & XML assertions, you can run tests in parallel for speed - which is critical for HTTP API testing.

Cucumber

Cucumber

Cucumber is a tool that supports Behaviour-Driven Development (BDD) - a software development process that aims to enhance software quality and reduce maintenance costs.

TestCafe

TestCafe

It is a pure node.js end-to-end solution for testing web apps. It takes care of all the stages: starting browsers, running tests, gathering test results and generating reports.

Spock Framework

Spock Framework

It is a testing and specification framework for Java and Groovy applications. What makes it stand out from the crowd is its beautiful and highly expressive specification language. It is compatible with most IDEs, build tools, and continuous integration servers.

Selenide

Selenide

It is a library for writing concise, readable, boilerplate-free tests in Java using Selenium WebDriver.

Capybara

Capybara

Capybara helps you test web applications by simulating how a real user would interact with your app. It is agnostic about the driver running your tests and comes with Rack::Test and Selenium support built in. WebKit is supported through an external gem.

Detox

Detox

High velocity native mobile development requires us to adopt continuous integration workflows, which means our reliance on manual QA has to drop significantly. It tests your mobile app while it's running in a real device/simulator, interacting with it just like a real user.

Imagium

Imagium

Imagium provides AI based visual testing solution for various forms of testing. It makes the job easier for QA Automation, Mobile Testers, DevOps and Compliance teams. Imagium is easy to integrate with any programing language

Codeception

Codeception

Full-stack testing framework for PHP. Run browsers tests, framework tests, APIs tests, unit tests with ease.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana