StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Platform as a Service
  4. Realtime Backend API
  5. PlayFab vs uWebSockets

PlayFab vs uWebSockets

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

PlayFab
PlayFab
Stacks37
Followers88
Votes0
uWebSockets
uWebSockets
Stacks16
Followers52
Votes0
GitHub Stars18.5K
Forks1.8K

PlayFab vs uWebSockets: What are the differences?

Introduction

When comparing PlayFab and uWebSockets, it is essential to understand the key differences between these two tools.

  1. Technology Used: PlayFab is a backend platform for game development that offers services like analytics, player management, and in-app purchasing, whereas uWebSockets is a lightweight and efficient C++ WebSocket library for building real-time web applications.

  2. Primary Focus: PlayFab focuses on providing a comprehensive backend solution tailored for game developers, including features such as player authentication, virtual goods, and matchmaking. In contrast, uWebSockets is primarily geared towards enabling real-time communication between clients and servers through WebSocket connections.

  3. Scalability: PlayFab is designed to scale effortlessly to accommodate millions of players and handle massive volumes of data, making it ideal for large-scale games with a vast player base. On the other hand, uWebSockets excels in handling high concurrency and low latency requirements, making it suitable for real-time applications where responsiveness is critical.

  4. Ease of Integration: PlayFab offers robust SDKs and plugins for popular game engines like Unity and Unreal Engine, streamlining the integration process for game developers. In contrast, while uWebSockets provides a simple and easy-to-use API for WebSocket communication, it may require more manual configuration and setup compared to PlayFab.

  5. Pricing Model: PlayFab follows a usage-based pricing model where developers pay for the resources they consume, such as API calls and storage, making it a cost-effective solution for projects of varying scales. Conversely, uWebSockets is open-source and free to use, making it a budget-friendly option for developers looking to incorporate WebSocket functionality without additional costs.

  6. Community Support: PlayFab has a large and active community of game developers, providing a wealth of resources, forums, and documentation to assist users in leveraging the platform effectively. While uWebSockets also has a supportive community, it may not offer the same level of specialized expertise and resources tailored specifically for game development.

In Summary, the key differences between PlayFab and uWebSockets lie in their technology focus, scalability, ease of integration, pricing model, and community support, catering to distinct needs in game development and real-time web applications.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on PlayFab, uWebSockets

Anil
Anil

Mar 7, 2020

Needs advice

I want to add uWebSockets.js in my application for real-time chatting, for that, I have to draw a UML and ufd diagram flow then I have to implement it in my code, my stack is node js, android, express, MongoDB, Redis. how can I do this? I want to add uWebSockets.js in my application for real-time chatting, for that, I have to draw a UML and ufd diagram flow then I have to implement it in my code, my stack is node js, android, express, MongoDB, Redis. how can I do this?I want to add uWebSockets.js in my application for real-time chatting, for that, I have to draw a UML and ufd diagram flow then I have to implement it in my code, my stack is node js, android, express, MongoDB, Redis. how can I do this?i want to add uWebSockets.js in my application for real time chatting, for that i have to draw a uml and ufd diagram flow then i have to implement it in my code , my stack is node js , android , express , mongoDb, redis . how can i do a this?

46.7k views46.7k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

PlayFab
PlayFab
uWebSockets
uWebSockets

It unlocks a new world of creativity for game developers by providing a cross-platform "backend-as-a-service" built exclusively for games. We give game developers the tools, technologies, and know-how they need to have a trouble-free launch day, and profitable day-to-day operations after that.

It is a simple to use yet thoroughly optimized implementation of HTTP and WebSockets. It comes with built-in pub/sub support, HTTP routing, TLS 1.3, IPv6, permessage-deflate and is battle tested as one of the most popular implementations, reaching many end-users daily.

Game Services; LiveOps; Analytics
HTTP and Websockets;Built-in pub/sub support;HTTP routing
Statistics
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Stars
18.5K
GitHub Forks
-
GitHub Forks
1.8K
Stacks
37
Stacks
16
Followers
88
Followers
52
Votes
0
Votes
0
Integrations
Android Studio
Android Studio
Java
Java
Unity
Unity
HTML5
HTML5
Unreal Engine
Unreal Engine
Cocoa Touch (iOS)
Cocoa Touch (iOS)
C++
C++
Windows
Windows
Linux
Linux
macOS
macOS

What are some alternatives to PlayFab, uWebSockets?

Firebase

Firebase

Firebase is a cloud service designed to power real-time, collaborative applications. Simply add the Firebase library to your application to gain access to a shared data structure; any changes you make to that data are automatically synchronized with the Firebase cloud and with other clients within milliseconds.

Socket.IO

Socket.IO

It enables real-time bidirectional event-based communication. It works on every platform, browser or device, focusing equally on reliability and speed.

PubNub

PubNub

PubNub makes it easy for you to add real-time capabilities to your apps, without worrying about the infrastructure. Build apps that allow your users to engage in real-time across mobile, browser, desktop and server.

Pusher

Pusher

Pusher is the category leader in delightful APIs for app developers building communication and collaboration features.

SignalR

SignalR

SignalR allows bi-directional communication between server and client. Servers can now push content to connected clients instantly as it becomes available. SignalR supports Web Sockets, and falls back to other compatible techniques for older browsers. SignalR includes APIs for connection management (for instance, connect and disconnect events), grouping connections, and authorization.

Ably

Ably

Ably offers WebSockets, stream resume, history, presence, and managed third-party integrations to make it simple to build, extend, and deliver digital realtime experiences at scale.

Syncano

Syncano

Syncano is a backend platform to build powerful real-time apps more efficiently. Integrate with any API, minimize boilerplate code and control your data - all from one place.

NATS

NATS

Unlike traditional enterprise messaging systems, NATS has an always-on dial tone that does whatever it takes to remain available. This forms a great base for building modern, reliable, and scalable cloud and distributed systems.

SocketCluster

SocketCluster

SocketCluster is a fast, highly scalable HTTP + realtime server engine which lets you build multi-process realtime servers that make use of all CPU cores on a machine/instance. It removes the limitations of having to run your Node.js server as a single thread and makes your backend resilient by automatically recovering from worker crashes and aggregating errors into a central log.

deepstream.io

deepstream.io

Scalable Server for Realtime Web Apps with JSON structures that can be read, manipulated and listened to, messages that can be sent to one or more subscribers, and request response workflows, between two clients or servers.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase