StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Testing Frameworks
  4. Browser Testing
  5. Playwright vs Sauce Labs

Playwright vs Sauce Labs

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Sauce Labs
Sauce Labs
Stacks314
Followers435
Votes439
Playwright
Playwright
Stacks618
Followers587
Votes81
GitHub Stars79.0K
Forks4.8K

Playwright vs Sauce Labs: What are the differences?

Introduction:

In this Markdown code, we will discuss the key differences between Playwright and Sauce Labs, two popular tools used in web development and testing.

  1. Execution Environment: Playwright allows code execution in multiple browsers and platforms, including Chrome, Safari, Firefox, and Edge, as well as Windows, macOS, and Linux. On the other hand, Sauce Labs provides a cloud-based execution environment, enabling automated tests to run on real browsers and operating systems without the need for setting up and maintaining physical or virtual machines.

  2. Cross-Browser Testing: Playwright offers extensive cross-browser support, allowing developers to write tests once and run them across different browsers effortlessly. It provides consistent APIs and handles browser-specific differences, making it easier to create robust and reliable tests. In contrast, Sauce Labs specializes in cross-browser testing by providing access to a wide range of browser and platform combinations, ensuring comprehensive testing across different environments.

  3. Synchronization: Playwright is designed with built-in automatic waiting, eliminating the need for explicit synchronization code in most cases. It intelligently waits for page elements and actions, making tests more stable and reliable. Sauce Labs, on the other hand, requires explicit synchronization code to handle asynchronous actions and ensure test stability, giving developers more control over the timing of their tests.

  4. Debugging Capabilities: Playwright offers advanced debugging capabilities, including the ability to take screenshots and record videos during test execution. It also provides detailed logs and debug information, facilitating easy troubleshooting of issues. Sauce Labs also offers similar debugging features such as screenshots and videos, but it additionally provides live debugging sessions, allowing developers to interactively debug their tests in real-time.

  5. Test Parallelization: Playwright allows tests to run in parallel across multiple environments, enabling faster test execution and reducing the overall test cycle time. It provides a convenient way to scale test runs by distributing the load on multiple machines or instances. Meanwhile, Sauce Labs excels in test parallelization by providing a highly scalable cloud infrastructure that allows running tests in parallel across a large number of browsers and operating systems, drastically reducing testing time.

  6. Pricing Model: Playwright is an open-source project maintained by Microsoft, making it freely available for usage. It provides a cost-effective solution for test automation, particularly for small to medium-sized projects. On the other hand, Sauce Labs follows a subscription-based pricing model that offers different tiers with varying levels of features and support. While it provides a powerful testing platform, the pricing may be more suitable for larger organizations with specific testing requirements.

In summary, Playwright offers cross-browser testing, synchronization, debugging capabilities, and test parallelization, with an open-source and cost-effective approach. Meanwhile, Sauce Labs specializes in cross-browser testing, provides a cloud-based execution environment, advanced debugging, extensive test parallelization, and offers a subscription-based pricing model.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Sauce Labs, Playwright

Rinchin
Rinchin

Jul 20, 2020

Needs adviceonSeleniumSeleniumSauce LabsSauce Labs

I am looking to purchase one of these tools for Mobile testing for my team. It should support Native, hybrid, and responsive app testing. It should also feature debugging, parallel execution, automation testing/easy integration with automation testing tools like Selenium, and the capability to provide availability of devices specifically for us to use at any time with good speed of performing all these activities.

I have already used Perfecto mobile, and Sauce Labs in my other projects before. I want to know how different or better is AWS Device farm in usage and how advantageous it would be for us to use it over other mentioned tools

217k views217k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Sauce Labs
Sauce Labs
Playwright
Playwright

Cloud-based automated testing platform enables developers and QEs to perform functional, JavaScript unit, and manual tests with Selenium or Appium on web and mobile apps. Videos and screenshots for easy debugging. Secure and CI-ready.

It is a Node library to automate the Chromium, WebKit and Firefox browsers with a single API. It enables cross-browser web automation that is ever-green, capable, reliable and fast.

700+ browser/OS/device combinations for cross-browser and platform testing to improve web and mobile app quality and eliminate the overhead of internal infrastructure; Highly reliable, on-demand cloud for enterprise-grade scalability and industry standard security; Optimized for popular testing frameworks, CI systems, and surrounding tools and services; Works with Selenium and Appium based on industry standard Selenium WebDriver protocol. Compatible with existing tests in any popular language and testing framework; Identify test failures quickly with debugging tools like screenshots, video recordings, and detailed logs
Node library; Headless supported; Enables cross-browser web automation; Improved automated UI testing
Statistics
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Stars
79.0K
GitHub Forks
-
GitHub Forks
4.8K
Stacks
314
Stacks
618
Followers
435
Followers
587
Votes
439
Votes
81
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 60
    Selenium-compatible
  • 46
    Webdriver compatible
  • 35
    Video recordings of every test
  • 31
    Qa
  • 29
    Mobile support
Cons
  • 2
    Expensive
  • 2
    Relatively slow
Pros
  • 15
    Cross browser
  • 11
    Open source
  • 9
    Test Runner with Playwright/test
  • 7
    Promise based
  • 7
    Well documented
Cons
  • 12
    Less help
  • 3
    Node based
  • 2
    Does not execute outside of browser
Integrations
CircleCI
CircleCI
Travis CI
Travis CI
Appium
Appium
Jenkins
Jenkins
Selenium
Selenium
Visual Studio
Visual Studio
AWS Cloud9
AWS Cloud9
TeamCity
TeamCity
Applitools
Applitools
Bamboo
Bamboo
No integrations available

What are some alternatives to Sauce Labs, Playwright?

BrowserStack

BrowserStack

BrowserStack is the leading test platform built for developers & QAs to expand test coverage, scale & optimize testing with cross-browser, real device cloud, accessibility, visual testing, test management, and test observability.

Selenium

Selenium

Selenium automates browsers. That's it! What you do with that power is entirely up to you. Primarily, it is for automating web applications for testing purposes, but is certainly not limited to just that. Boring web-based administration tasks can (and should!) also be automated as well.

LambdaTest

LambdaTest

LambdaTest platform provides secure, scalable and insightful test orchestration for website, and mobile app testing. Customers at different points in their DevOps lifecycle can leverage Automation and/or Manual testing on LambdaTest.

Karma

Karma

Karma is not a testing framework, nor an assertion library. Karma just launches a HTTP server, and generates the test runner HTML file you probably already know from your favourite testing framework. So for testing purposes you can use pretty much anything you like.

Rainforest QA

Rainforest QA

Rainforest gives you the reliability of a QA team and the speed of automation, without the hassle of managing a team or the pain of writing automated tests.

WebdriverIO

WebdriverIO

WebdriverIO lets you control a browser or a mobile application with just a few lines of code. Your test code will look simple, concise and easy to read.

Puppeteer

Puppeteer

Puppeteer is a Node library which provides a high-level API to control headless Chrome over the DevTools Protocol. It can also be configured to use full (non-headless) Chrome.

TestingBot

TestingBot

TestingBot provides automated and Manual cross browser testing in the cloud. Make sure your website looks ok in all browsers.

Ghost Inspector

Ghost Inspector

It lets you create and manage UI tests that check specific functionality in your website or application. We execute these automated browser tests continuously from the cloud and alert you if anything breaks.

PhantomJS

PhantomJS

PhantomJS is a headless WebKit scriptable with JavaScript. It is used by hundreds of developers and dozens of organizations for web-related development workflow.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana