Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
Karate DSL vs Postman: What are the differences?
Karate DSL and Postman are both popular tools used for testing and automating API requests. Let's explore the key differences between them.
Language and Syntax: Karate DSL is written in a domain-specific language (DSL) that is specifically designed for API testing. On the other hand, Postman uses JavaScript for scripting and testing APIs. This means that while Karate DSL provides a more focused and specific language for API testing, Postman allows for more flexibility and familiarity with JavaScript syntax.
Testing Approach: Karate DSL promotes a BDD (Behavior-Driven Development) approach, where tests are written in a behavior-driven style using keywords like Given, When, and Then. This makes the tests more readable and understandable to non-technical stakeholders. In contrast, Postman follows a more traditional approach to testing, where tests are written using assertions and validations.
Built-in Features: Karate DSL comes with several built-in features that make it a powerful tool for API testing. It includes features like JSON and XML manipulation, data-driven testing, parallel test execution, mock server, and even support for UI automation. Postman also provides some similar features, but it may require additional plugins or extensions to achieve the same level of functionality.
Collaboration and Documentation: Karate DSL has built-in support for generating HTML reports, which makes it easier to share test results and collaborate with team members. It also provides the ability to generate comprehensive API documentation directly from the test scenarios. Postman, on the other hand, provides a built-in sharing and collaboration platform that allows team members to work together on API documentation and testing.
Integration with CI/CD: Karate DSL has seamless integration with popular CI/CD tools like Jenkins and Bamboo, making it easier to incorporate API testing into the development workflow. It provides built-in support for generating JUnit XML reports, which can be consumed by CI/CD tools for reporting and analysis. Postman also supports CI/CD integration but may require additional configurations and setup.
Pricing and Licensing: Karate DSL is a free and open-source tool, which means it can be used without any cost restrictions. It also provides commercial support options for enterprise users. Postman has a freemium model, where the basic features are available for free but additional features and advanced functionality require a paid subscription.
In summary, Karate DSL, an open-source tool, is tailored for testing web services and APIs, featuring a straightforward syntax based on Gherkin. It facilitates comprehensive API tests, including assertions, mocking, and scenario-driven testing, all within a single tool. In contrast, Postman offers a broader API development environment with features for testing, documentation, collaboration, and automation. While Karate DSL prioritizes behavior-driven testing and automation, Postman provides a more extensive range of capabilities, suitable for various stages of the API lifecycle.
From a StackShare Community member: "I just started working for a start-up and we are in desperate need of better documentation for our API. Currently our API docs is in a README.md file. We are evaluating Postman and Swagger UI. Since there are many options and I was wondering what other StackSharers would recommend?"
I use Postman because of the ease of team-management, using workspaces and teams, runner, collections, environment variables, test-scripts (post execution), variable management (pre and post execution), folders (inside collections, for better management of APIs), newman, easy-ci-integration (and probably a few more things that I am not able to recall right now).
I use Swagger UI because it's an easy tool for end-consumers to visualize and test our APIs. It focuses on that ! And it's directly embedded and delivered with the APIs. Postman's built-in tools aren't bad, but their main focus isn't the documentation and also, they are hosted outside the project.
I recommend Postman because it's easy to use with history option. Also, it has very great features like runner, collections, test scripts runners, defining environment variables and simple exporting and importing data.
Postman supports automation and organization in a way that Insomnia just doesn't. Admittedly, Insomnia makes it slightly easy to query the data that you get back (in a very MongoDB-esque query language) but Postman sets you up to develop the code that you would use in development/testing right in the editor.
Pros of Karate DSL
- Easy CI integration via cross-platform executable / CLI11
- Easy for even non-programmers to get started9
- Simple and meaningful asserts for large responses9
- Data-driven tests that can even use JSON or CSV sources7
- Easy parameterized configuration / custom variables5
- Very fast api testing tool5
- Comprehensive documentation and examples5
- Powerful and flexible payload assertions4
- Simple, concise, readable and maintainable tests4
- Easy re-use of JSON or JS / Java logic across tests4
- IDE support - IntelliJ, Eclipse & Visual Studio Code4
- Best option for testing GraphQL3
- Java-interop so you never "hit a wall" in the framework3
- Simple yet flexible Environment Switching built-in2
- Optionally mix re-usable JavaScript logic into scripts1
- Parallel Execution with Reports Aggregated1
- Active, Responsive community on Stack Overflow1
- Re-use functional tests as performance tests1
- Super simple API mocking, within the firewall1
- XML support, not just JSON1
- Developer-friendly collaboration via standard SCM / Git1
- Rich HTML reports with HTTP logs in-line1
- Great Developer-Experience - Debug UI, HTML reports1
- Websockets support1
- Rest assured0
Pros of Postman
- Easy to use490
- Great tool369
- Makes developing rest api's easy peasy276
- Easy setup, looks good156
- The best api workflow out there144
- It's the best53
- History feature53
- Adds real value to my workflow44
- Great interface that magically predicts your needs43
- The best in class app35
- Can save and share script12
- Fully featured without looking cluttered10
- Collections8
- Option to run scrips8
- Global/Environment Variables8
- Shareable Collections7
- Dead simple and useful. Excellent7
- Dark theme easy on the eyes7
- Awesome customer support6
- Great integration with newman6
- Documentation5
- Simple5
- The test script is useful5
- Saves responses4
- This has simplified my testing significantly4
- Makes testing API's as easy as 1,2,34
- Easy as pie4
- API-network3
- I'd recommend it to everyone who works with apis3
- Mocking API calls with predefined response3
- Now supports GraphQL2
- Postman Runner CI Integration2
- Easy to setup, test and provides test storage2
- Continuous integration using newman2
- Pre-request Script and Test attributes are invaluable2
- Runner2
- Graph2
- <a href="http://fixbit.com/">useful tool</a>1
Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions
Cons of Karate DSL
- Ode support becomes very time consuming and expensive b1
- Finding errors in code is not easy1
- There is no IntelliSense support in IDE1
- Karate uses its own scripting language1
- Complex folder structure, without a defined pattern1
- Confusing report: Summarized by steps and not by featur1
Cons of Postman
- Stores credentials in HTTP10
- Bloated features and UI9
- Cumbersome to switch authentication tokens8
- Poor GraphQL support7
- Expensive5
- Not free after 5 users3
- Can't prompt for per-request variables3
- Import swagger1
- Support websocket1
- Import curl1