Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
OpenAPI vs Postman: What are the differences?
Key Differences Between OpenAPI and Postman
OpenAPI and Postman are both tools commonly used in the field of API development and testing. While they share some similarities, they also have key differences that set them apart.
1. OpenAPI: Definition-Driven Approach, Postman: Request-Based Approach OpenAPI follows a definition-driven approach where the API design is based on a structured specification file (usually in YAML or JSON format). Developers use this file to specify the API endpoints, request and response formats, and other details. On the other hand, Postman takes a request-based approach, allowing developers to manually create and configure HTTP requests.
2. OpenAPI: API Documentation, Postman: API Testing OpenAPI focuses on providing comprehensive documentation for the APIs. It offers a standard way to describe and document the endpoints, request/response models, and other details of the API. Postman, on the other hand, is primarily a tool for API testing. It allows developers to send requests, test different scenarios, and analyze response data.
3. OpenAPI: Supports Multiple Languages/Frameworks, Postman: Language-agnostic OpenAPI provides support for multiple programming languages and frameworks. Developers can use the generated OpenAPI code snippets to quickly integrate the API into their preferred language or framework. Postman, on the other hand, is language-agnostic and can be used with any programming language or framework.
4. OpenAPI: Collaborative Development, Postman: Individual Development OpenAPI promotes collaborative development by allowing multiple developers to work on the API documentation and share their changes using version control systems. It encourages teamwork and helps maintain consistency across the API development process. Postman, on the other hand, is more focused on individual development and provides features like collections and workspaces to organize API-related work individually.
5. OpenAPI: Standardization, Postman: Flexibility OpenAPI follows a standardized approach to API documentation and design. It uses the OpenAPI specification, which is widely adopted and supported by various API-related tools and platforms. This standardization ensures consistency and interoperability. Postman, on the other hand, offers more flexibility in terms of request customization and testing scenarios. It allows developers to manually modify requests, pre-process response data, and iterate quickly during the testing phase.
6. OpenAPI: Pre-production Phase, Postman: Production Phase OpenAPI is typically used in the pre-production phase of API development. It helps in designing the API, documenting its specifications, and generating code snippets for integration. It is often used in conjunction with other tools like API gateways to implement the actual API. Postman, on the other hand, is commonly used during the production phase to test and validate the API. It helps in identifying and fixing issues before the API is exposed to the end-users.
In summary, OpenAPI focuses on a definition-driven approach and comprehensive API documentation, with support for multiple languages and collaborative development. Postman, on the other hand, is more focused on request-based testing, providing flexibility and ease of use during the production phase of API development.
From a StackShare Community member: "I just started working for a start-up and we are in desperate need of better documentation for our API. Currently our API docs is in a README.md file. We are evaluating Postman and Swagger UI. Since there are many options and I was wondering what other StackSharers would recommend?"
I use Postman because of the ease of team-management, using workspaces and teams, runner, collections, environment variables, test-scripts (post execution), variable management (pre and post execution), folders (inside collections, for better management of APIs), newman, easy-ci-integration (and probably a few more things that I am not able to recall right now).
I use Swagger UI because it's an easy tool for end-consumers to visualize and test our APIs. It focuses on that ! And it's directly embedded and delivered with the APIs. Postman's built-in tools aren't bad, but their main focus isn't the documentation and also, they are hosted outside the project.
I recommend Postman because it's easy to use with history option. Also, it has very great features like runner, collections, test scripts runners, defining environment variables and simple exporting and importing data.
Postman supports automation and organization in a way that Insomnia just doesn't. Admittedly, Insomnia makes it slightly easy to query the data that you get back (in a very MongoDB-esque query language) but Postman sets you up to develop the code that you would use in development/testing right in the editor.
Pros of OpenAPI
- Easy to read the template generated1
- The most popular api spec1
- Easy to learn1
- Supports versioning1
- Supports authentication1
- Supports caching1
Pros of Postman
- Easy to use490
- Great tool369
- Makes developing rest api's easy peasy276
- Easy setup, looks good156
- The best api workflow out there144
- It's the best53
- History feature53
- Adds real value to my workflow44
- Great interface that magically predicts your needs43
- The best in class app35
- Can save and share script12
- Fully featured without looking cluttered10
- Collections8
- Option to run scrips8
- Global/Environment Variables8
- Shareable Collections7
- Dead simple and useful. Excellent7
- Dark theme easy on the eyes7
- Awesome customer support6
- Great integration with newman6
- Documentation5
- Simple5
- The test script is useful5
- Saves responses4
- This has simplified my testing significantly4
- Makes testing API's as easy as 1,2,34
- Easy as pie4
- API-network3
- I'd recommend it to everyone who works with apis3
- Mocking API calls with predefined response3
- Now supports GraphQL2
- Postman Runner CI Integration2
- Easy to setup, test and provides test storage2
- Continuous integration using newman2
- Pre-request Script and Test attributes are invaluable2
- Runner2
- Graph2
- <a href="http://fixbit.com/">useful tool</a>1
Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions
Cons of OpenAPI
Cons of Postman
- Stores credentials in HTTP10
- Bloated features and UI9
- Cumbersome to switch authentication tokens8
- Poor GraphQL support7
- Expensive5
- Not free after 5 users3
- Can't prompt for per-request variables3
- Import swagger1
- Support websocket1
- Import curl1