Postman vs Postwoman

Overview

Postman

Stacks96.1K

Followers82.5K

Votes1.8K

Forks0

Postwoman

Stacks57

Followers153

Votes9

Postman vs Postwoman: What are the differences?

Postwoman is an open-source API request builder and testing tool that is similar to Postman. Let's explore the key differences between Postman and Postwoman:

User Interface and Experience: Postman provides a comprehensive and feature-rich graphical user interface (GUI) to easily create, send, and manage API requests. Postwoman, on the other hand, is a lightweight and minimalist API client that focuses on simplicity and ease of use. It provides a clean and streamlined interface with a minimal set of features, making it lightweight and efficient for quick API testing and debugging.
Open Source and Customizability: Postman is a proprietary tool that offers both free and paid versions. It provides a range of advanced features, such as automated testing, team collaboration, and API documentation generation. Postwoman, on the other hand, is an open-source project that is freely available and community-driven. Being open source, Postwoman offers the advantage of customizability, allowing users to modify and extend its functionality to suit their specific needs.
Installation and Accessibility: Postman is a desktop application available for Windows, macOS, and Linux. It requires downloading and installing the application on the user's machine. Postwoman, on the other hand, is a web-based application accessible through a web browser. Users can access Postwoman directly from their browser without the need for installation or additional software. This web-based nature of Postwoman offers the advantage of cross-platform compatibility and easy accessibility, as it can be used on any operating system with a web browser.
Ecosystem and Integration: Postman has a robust ecosystem with various integrations and extensions that enhance the API development workflow. It integrates well with popular development tools, version control systems, and continuous integration/continuous deployment (CI/CD) pipelines. Postwoman, being a lightweight tool, may have fewer integrations and extensions available compared to Postman. However, as an open-source project, it allows users to contribute and build custom integrations as needed.

In summary, Postman provides a feature-rich GUI with advanced functionality and a strong ecosystem of integrations. It is suitable for complex API workflows and team collaboration. Postwoman, on the other hand, focuses on simplicity and ease of use, with a minimalist interface and web-based accessibility. It is lightweight, open-source, and offers customization options.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Advice on Postman, Postwoman

Jagdeep

Tech Lead at Founder and Lightning

May 6, 2019

Reviewon

Postman

I use Postman because of the ease of team-management, using workspaces and teams, runner, collections, environment variables, test-scripts (post execution), variable management (pre and post execution), folders (inside collections, for better management of APIs), newman, easy-ci-integration (and probably a few more things that I am not able to recall right now).

411k views411k

Comments

StackShare

May 1, 2019

Needs advice

From a StackShare Community member: "I just started working for a start-up and we are in desperate need of better documentation for our API. Currently our API docs is in a README.md file. We are evaluating Postman and Swagger UI. Since there are many options and I was wondering what other StackSharers would recommend?"

382k views382k

Comments

Stephen

Artificial Intelligence Fellow

Feb 4, 2020

Decided

Postman supports automation and organization in a way that Insomnia just doesn't. Admittedly, Insomnia makes it slightly easy to query the data that you get back (in a very MongoDB-esque query language) but Postman sets you up to develop the code that you would use in development/testing right in the editor.

361k views361k

Comments

Detailed Comparison

Postman	Postwoman
It is the only complete API development environment, used by nearly five million developers and more than 100,000 companies worldwide.	It is a free, fast, and beautiful alternative to Postman. It helps you create your requests faster, saving you precious time on your development.
Compact layout;HTTP requests with file upload support;Formatted API responses for JSON and XML;Image previews;Request history;Basic Auth, OAuth 1.0, OAuth 2.0, and other common auth helpers;Autocomplete for URL and header values;Key/value editors for adding parameters or header values. Works for URL parameters too.;Use environment variables to easily shift between settings. Great for testing production, staging or local setups.;Keyboard shortcuts to maximize your productivity;Automatically generated web documentation;Mock servers hosted on Postman’s cloud;API monitoring run from Postman cloud	Crafted with minimalistic UI design. Simple design is the best design.; Faster, lighter, cleaner, minimal & responsive; Send requests and get/copy responses in real-time
Statistics
GitHub Forks 0	GitHub Forks -
Stacks 96.1K	Stacks 57
Followers 82.5K	Followers 153
Votes 1.8K	Votes 9
Pros & Cons
Pros 490 Easy to use 369 Great tool 276 Makes developing rest api's easy peasy 156 Easy setup, looks good 144 The best api workflow out there Cons 10 Stores credentials in HTTP 9 Bloated features and UI 8 Cumbersome to switch authentication tokens 7 Poor GraphQL support 5 Expensive	Pros 9 Brings some much needed gender balance
Integrations
HipChat Keen Slack Dropbox Datadog PagerDuty Bigpanda Microsoft Teams Newman VictorOps	No integrations available

What are some alternatives to Postman, Postwoman?

Swagger UI

Swagger UI is a dependency-free collection of HTML, Javascript, and CSS assets that dynamically generate beautiful documentation and sandbox from a Swagger-compliant API

Paw

Paw is a full-featured and beautifully designed Mac app that makes interaction with REST services delightful. Either you are an API maker or consumer, Paw helps you build HTTP requests, inspect the server's response and even generate client code.

Apiary

It takes more than a simple HTML page to thrill your API users. The right tools take weeks of development. Weeks that apiary.io saves.

Karate DSL

Combines API test-automation, mocks and performance-testing into a single, unified framework. The BDD syntax popularized by Cucumber is language-neutral, and easy for even non-programmers. Besides powerful JSON & XML assertions, you can run tests in parallel for speed - which is critical for HTTP API testing.

ReadMe.io

It is an easy-to-use tool to help you build out documentation! Each documentation site that you publish is a project where there is space for documentation, interactive API reference guides, a changelog, and much more.

Appwrite

Appwrite's open-source platform lets you add Auth, DBs, Functions and Storage to your product and build any application at any scale, own your data, and use your preferred coding languages and tools.

Runscope

Keep tabs on all aspects of your API's performance with uptime monitoring, integration testing, logging and real-time monitoring.

Insomnia REST Client

Insomnia is a powerful REST API Client with cookie management, environment variables, code generation, and authentication for Mac, Window, and Linux.

RAML

RESTful API Modeling Language (RAML) makes it easy to manage the whole API lifecycle from design to sharing. It's concise - you only write what you need to define - and reusable. It is machine readable API design that is actually human friendly.

Docusaurus

Docusaurus is a project for easily building, deploying, and maintaining open source project websites.

Related Comparisons

User Interface and Experience: Postman provides a comprehensive and feature-rich graphical user interface (GUI) to easily create, send, and manage API requests. Postwoman, on the other hand, is a lightweight and minimalist API client that focuses on simplicity and ease of use. It provides a clean and streamlined interface with a minimal set of features, making it lightweight and efficient for quick API testing and debugging.
Open Source and Customizability: Postman is a proprietary tool that offers both free and paid versions. It provides a range of advanced features, such as automated testing, team collaboration, and API documentation generation. Postwoman, on the other hand, is an open-source project that is freely available and community-driven. Being open source, Postwoman offers the advantage of customizability, allowing users to modify and extend its functionality to suit their specific needs.
Installation and Accessibility: Postman is a desktop application available for Windows, macOS, and Linux. It requires downloading and installing the application on the user's machine. Postwoman, on the other hand, is a web-based application accessible through a web browser. Users can access Postwoman directly from their browser without the need for installation or additional software. This web-based nature of Postwoman offers the advantage of cross-platform compatibility and easy accessibility, as it can be used on any operating system with a web browser.
Ecosystem and Integration: Postman has a robust ecosystem with various integrations and extensions that enhance the API development workflow. It integrates well with popular development tools, version control systems, and continuous integration/continuous deployment (CI/CD) pipelines. Postwoman, being a lightweight tool, may have fewer integrations and extensions available compared to Postman. However, as an open-source project, it allows users to contribute and build custom integrations as needed.

Postman vs Postwoman