StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Utilities
  3. API Tools
  4. API Tools
  5. Postman vs Sandbox

Postman vs Sandbox

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Postman
Postman
Stacks96.1K
Followers82.5K
Votes1.8K
Forks0
Sandbox
Sandbox
Stacks28
Followers55
Votes0
GitHub Stars6
Forks5

Postman vs Sandbox: What are the differences?

Introduction

This document outlines the key differences between Postman and Sandbox, two popular tools used in web development and API testing.

  1. Pricing Model: Postman offers a variety of pricing options, including a free plan with limited features and paid plans with additional functionalities for teams and enterprises. Sandbox, on the other hand, is completely free and open-source, making it a great choice for individuals and small projects with limited budgets.

  2. Design and User Interface: Postman provides a user-friendly and intuitive interface that allows users to easily create, organize, and execute API requests. It offers a rich set of features, such as request history, collections, and environments, making it a comprehensive tool for API testing and development. Sandbox, on the other hand, has a simpler design and a less extensive feature set, focusing primarily on providing a lightweight and efficient testing environment.

  3. Collaboration and Teamwork: Postman has robust collaboration and teamwork features, allowing multiple team members to collaborate on API development and testing. It provides functionalities like team workspaces, sharing of collections and environments, and real-time collaboration. Sandbox, being a stand-alone testing environment, lacks these collaboration tools and is more suitable for individual use or small projects where collaboration is not a priority.

  4. Mocking and Simulating APIs: Postman offers built-in mocking capabilities, allowing users to simulate API responses and test their applications without the need for a live backend. This can be particularly useful during the development and testing stages. Sandbox, on the other hand, does not have built-in mocking capabilities, as its primary goal is to provide a lightweight testing environment rather than replicating complex API behaviors.

  5. Integration and Extensibility: Postman provides extensive integration capabilities, allowing users to seamlessly integrate their API testing workflows with other tools and services. It offers integrations with popular tools like Jenkins, Git, and Newman, as well as the ability to create custom integrations using the Postman API. Sandbox, being a stand-alone testing environment, lacks these integration capabilities and does not provide an API for extensibility.

  6. Ease of Deployment: Postman offers a cloud-based platform that allows users to easily share and access their API collections and environments from anywhere, making it convenient for remote teams and distributed workflows. Sandbox, on the other hand, is typically deployed locally or on a server, requiring additional setup and configuration for remote access and collaboration.

In summary, Postman is a comprehensive API testing and development tool with a rich set of features, collaboration capabilities, and extensive integrations, while Sandbox is a lightweight and open-source testing environment more suitable for individual use or smaller projects with limited budgets.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Postman, Sandbox

Jagdeep
Jagdeep

Tech Lead at Founder and Lightning

May 6, 2019

ReviewonPostmanPostman

I use Postman because of the ease of team-management, using workspaces and teams, runner, collections, environment variables, test-scripts (post execution), variable management (pre and post execution), folders (inside collections, for better management of APIs), newman, easy-ci-integration (and probably a few more things that I am not able to recall right now).

411k views411k
Comments
StackShare
StackShare

May 1, 2019

Needs advice

From a StackShare Community member: "I just started working for a start-up and we are in desperate need of better documentation for our API. Currently our API docs is in a README.md file. We are evaluating Postman and Swagger UI. Since there are many options and I was wondering what other StackSharers would recommend?"

382k views382k
Comments
Stephen
Stephen

Artificial Intelligence Fellow

Feb 4, 2020

Decided

Postman supports automation and organization in a way that Insomnia just doesn't. Admittedly, Insomnia makes it slightly easy to query the data that you get back (in a very MongoDB-esque query language) but Postman sets you up to develop the code that you would use in development/testing right in the editor.

361k views361k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Postman
Postman
Sandbox
Sandbox

It is the only complete API development environment, used by nearly five million developers and more than 100,000 companies worldwide.

Quickly mock RESTful API or SOAP web-services with simple or dynamic responses, and fault injection to simulate real application behaviour.

Compact layout;HTTP requests with file upload support;Formatted API responses for JSON and XML;Image previews;Request history;Basic Auth, OAuth 1.0, OAuth 2.0, and other common auth helpers;Autocomplete for URL and header values;Key/value editors for adding parameters or header values. Works for URL parameters too.;Use environment variables to easily shift between settings. Great for testing production, staging or local setups.;Keyboard shortcuts to maximize your productivity;Automatically generated web documentation;Mock servers hosted on Postman’s cloud;API monitoring run from Postman cloud
-
Statistics
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Stars
6
GitHub Forks
0
GitHub Forks
5
Stacks
96.1K
Stacks
28
Followers
82.5K
Followers
55
Votes
1.8K
Votes
0
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 490
    Easy to use
  • 369
    Great tool
  • 276
    Makes developing rest api's easy peasy
  • 156
    Easy setup, looks good
  • 144
    The best api workflow out there
Cons
  • 10
    Stores credentials in HTTP
  • 9
    Bloated features and UI
  • 8
    Cumbersome to switch authentication tokens
  • 7
    Poor GraphQL support
  • 5
    Expensive
No community feedback yet
Integrations
HipChat
HipChat
Keen
Keen
Slack
Slack
Dropbox
Dropbox
Datadog
Datadog
PagerDuty
PagerDuty
Bigpanda
Bigpanda
Microsoft Teams
Microsoft Teams
Newman
Newman
VictorOps
VictorOps
Apiary
Apiary
Swagger UI
Swagger UI
RAML
RAML

What are some alternatives to Postman, Sandbox?

Swagger UI

Swagger UI

Swagger UI is a dependency-free collection of HTML, Javascript, and CSS assets that dynamically generate beautiful documentation and sandbox from a Swagger-compliant API

Paw

Paw

Paw is a full-featured and beautifully designed Mac app that makes interaction with REST services delightful. Either you are an API maker or consumer, Paw helps you build HTTP requests, inspect the server's response and even generate client code.

Apiary

Apiary

It takes more than a simple HTML page to thrill your API users. The right tools take weeks of development. Weeks that apiary.io saves.

Karate DSL

Karate DSL

Combines API test-automation, mocks and performance-testing into a single, unified framework. The BDD syntax popularized by Cucumber is language-neutral, and easy for even non-programmers. Besides powerful JSON & XML assertions, you can run tests in parallel for speed - which is critical for HTTP API testing.

ReadMe.io

ReadMe.io

It is an easy-to-use tool to help you build out documentation! Each documentation site that you publish is a project where there is space for documentation, interactive API reference guides, a changelog, and much more.

Appwrite

Appwrite

Appwrite's open-source platform lets you add Auth, DBs, Functions and Storage to your product and build any application at any scale, own your data, and use your preferred coding languages and tools.

Runscope

Runscope

Keep tabs on all aspects of your API's performance with uptime monitoring, integration testing, logging and real-time monitoring.

Insomnia REST Client

Insomnia REST Client

Insomnia is a powerful REST API Client with cookie management, environment variables, code generation, and authentication for Mac, Window, and Linux.

RAML

RAML

RESTful API Modeling Language (RAML) makes it easy to manage the whole API lifecycle from design to sharing. It's concise - you only write what you need to define - and reusable. It is machine readable API design that is actually human friendly.

Docusaurus

Docusaurus

Docusaurus is a project for easily building, deploying, and maintaining open source project websites.

Related Comparisons

Postman
Swagger UI

Postman vs Swagger UI

Mapbox
Google Maps

Google Maps vs Mapbox

Mapbox
Leaflet

Leaflet vs Mapbox vs OpenLayers

Twilio SendGrid
Mailgun

Mailgun vs Mandrill vs SendGrid

Runscope
Postman

Paw vs Postman vs Runscope