Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

Postman

92.8K
79.5K
+ 1
1.8K
Wiki.js

53
142
+ 1
2
Add tool

Postman vs Wiki.js: What are the differences?

Introduction

Postman and Wiki.js are two widely used tools in software development. While both tools are used to manage and organize information, they have distinct differences that set them apart. In this article, we will explore the key differences between Postman and Wiki.js.

  1. User Interface and Functionality: Postman primarily focuses on API testing and development. It offers a clean and intuitive user interface with features specifically designed for API related tasks such as creating requests, managing endpoints, and documenting APIs. On the other hand, Wiki.js is a versatile wiki software that allows users to create, edit, and organize documentation and knowledge base content. Its user interface is geared towards creating and managing articles, pages, and categories, making it a valuable tool for collaborative content creation.

  2. Collaboration and Access Control: Postman offers limited collaboration features. It allows users to share workspaces and collections with team members, but it lacks granular access control and permission settings that are crucial for larger teams. Wiki.js, on the other hand, provides extensive collaboration capabilities. It supports user roles, permissions, and access control at various levels, making it suitable for teams of all sizes. Users can define who can read, write, edit, and delete content, ensuring efficient collaboration and content management.

  3. Content Organization and Navigation: Postman organizes requests and endpoints as collections and folders, offering a straightforward hierarchy. While this structure is sufficient for API testing, it may not be ideal for organizing large amounts of textual content. Wiki.js, on the other hand, provides a more advanced content organization system. It allows users to create nested categories, hierarchies, and cross-link articles, enabling better structuring and navigation within the knowledge base.

  4. Search and Discoverability: Postman primarily focuses on API testing rather than content discovery. It offers a basic search functionality that allows users to search for collections and endpoints. However, Wiki.js puts a strong emphasis on search and discoverability. It provides advanced search capabilities, including full-text search, search filters, and search suggestions, making it easier for users to find specific content within the wiki.

  5. Customization and Extensions: Postman offers limited customization options. Users can customize the appearance of the application, but they have limited control over the functionality and features. On the other hand, Wiki.js allows extensive customization. Users can customize the look and feel of the wiki, add custom CSS or JavaScript, and even create custom plugins and extensions, providing flexibility to tailor the tool to specific requirements.

  6. Integration and Automation: Postman has robust integration capabilities and supports automation through the use of scripts and Newman, its command-line tool. It can be integrated with external tools, services, and Continuous Integration/Continuous Deployment (CI/CD) platforms. Wiki.js, although not primarily designed for automation, offers integration with various services and tools through its RESTful API. However, its automation capabilities are more limited compared to Postman.

In summary, Postman is a specialized tool for API testing and development with limited collaboration and customization options. On the other hand, Wiki.js is a versatile wiki software with extensive collaboration features, powerful search capabilities, and customization options. Depending on the requirements of the project, users can choose the tool that best suits their needs.

Advice on Postman and Wiki.js
Needs advice
on
PostmanPostmanApiaryApiary
and
Swagger UISwagger UI

From a StackShare Community member: "I just started working for a start-up and we are in desperate need of better documentation for our API. Currently our API docs is in a README.md file. We are evaluating Postman and Swagger UI. Since there are many options and I was wondering what other StackSharers would recommend?"

See more
Replies (3)
Jagdeep Singh
Tech Lead at ucreate.it · | 8 upvotes · 379.7K views

I use Postman because of the ease of team-management, using workspaces and teams, runner, collections, environment variables, test-scripts (post execution), variable management (pre and post execution), folders (inside collections, for better management of APIs), newman, easy-ci-integration (and probably a few more things that I am not able to recall right now).

See more

I use Swagger UI because it's an easy tool for end-consumers to visualize and test our APIs. It focuses on that ! And it's directly embedded and delivered with the APIs. Postman's built-in tools aren't bad, but their main focus isn't the documentation and also, they are hosted outside the project.

See more
Sadik Ay
Recommends
on
PostmanPostman

I recommend Postman because it's easy to use with history option. Also, it has very great features like runner, collections, test scripts runners, defining environment variables and simple exporting and importing data.

See more
Decisions about Postman and Wiki.js
Stephen Fox
Artificial Intelligence Fellow · | 1 upvote · 335.6K views

Postman supports automation and organization in a way that Insomnia just doesn't. Admittedly, Insomnia makes it slightly easy to query the data that you get back (in a very MongoDB-esque query language) but Postman sets you up to develop the code that you would use in development/testing right in the editor.

See more
Get Advice from developers at your company using StackShare Enterprise. Sign up for StackShare Enterprise.
Learn More
Pros of Postman
Pros of Wiki.js
  • 490
    Easy to use
  • 369
    Great tool
  • 276
    Makes developing rest api's easy peasy
  • 156
    Easy setup, looks good
  • 144
    The best api workflow out there
  • 53
    It's the best
  • 53
    History feature
  • 44
    Adds real value to my workflow
  • 43
    Great interface that magically predicts your needs
  • 35
    The best in class app
  • 12
    Can save and share script
  • 10
    Fully featured without looking cluttered
  • 8
    Collections
  • 8
    Option to run scrips
  • 8
    Global/Environment Variables
  • 7
    Shareable Collections
  • 7
    Dead simple and useful. Excellent
  • 7
    Dark theme easy on the eyes
  • 6
    Awesome customer support
  • 6
    Great integration with newman
  • 5
    Documentation
  • 5
    Simple
  • 5
    The test script is useful
  • 4
    Saves responses
  • 4
    This has simplified my testing significantly
  • 4
    Makes testing API's as easy as 1,2,3
  • 4
    Easy as pie
  • 3
    API-network
  • 3
    I'd recommend it to everyone who works with apis
  • 3
    Mocking API calls with predefined response
  • 2
    Now supports GraphQL
  • 2
    Postman Runner CI Integration
  • 2
    Easy to setup, test and provides test storage
  • 2
    Continuous integration using newman
  • 2
    Pre-request Script and Test attributes are invaluable
  • 2
    Runner
  • 2
    Graph
  • 1
    <a href="http://fixbit.com/">useful tool</a>
  • 1
    Fast speed by node.js
  • 1
    Open Source

Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions

Cons of Postman
Cons of Wiki.js
  • 10
    Stores credentials in HTTP
  • 9
    Bloated features and UI
  • 8
    Cumbersome to switch authentication tokens
  • 7
    Poor GraphQL support
  • 5
    Expensive
  • 3
    Not free after 5 users
  • 3
    Can't prompt for per-request variables
  • 1
    Import swagger
  • 1
    Support websocket
  • 1
    Import curl
  • 1
    No tree structure by default

Sign up to add or upvote consMake informed product decisions

- No public GitHub repository available -

What is Postman?

It is the only complete API development environment, used by nearly five million developers and more than 100,000 companies worldwide.

What is Wiki.js?

It is an open source, modern and powerful wiki app based on Node.js, Git, and Markdown. It runs on the flamingly fast Node.js engine and is optimized to conserve CPU resources.

Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

What companies use Postman?
What companies use Wiki.js?
See which teams inside your own company are using Postman or Wiki.js.
Sign up for StackShare EnterpriseLearn More

Sign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions

What tools integrate with Postman?
What tools integrate with Wiki.js?

Sign up to get full access to all the tool integrationsMake informed product decisions

What are some alternatives to Postman and Wiki.js?
Swagger UI
Swagger UI is a dependency-free collection of HTML, Javascript, and CSS assets that dynamically generate beautiful documentation and sandbox from a Swagger-compliant API
Insomnia REST Client
Insomnia is a powerful REST API Client with cookie management, environment variables, code generation, and authentication for Mac, Window, and Linux.
Paw
Paw is a full-featured and beautifully designed Mac app that makes interaction with REST services delightful. Either you are an API maker or consumer, Paw helps you build HTTP requests, inspect the server's response and even generate client code.
Apigee
API management, design, analytics, and security are at the heart of modern digital architecture. The Apigee intelligent API platform is a complete solution for moving business to the digital world.
cURL
Used in command lines or scripts to transfer data. It is also used in cars, television sets, routers, printers, audio equipment, mobile phones, tablets, and is the internet transfer backbone for thousands of software applications affecting billions of humans daily.
See all alternatives