Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

Pug

1.2K
1.2K
+ 1
467
Slim Lang

67
57
+ 1
50
Add tool

Pug vs Slim Lang: What are the differences?

# Introduction
In the realm of web development, there are various templating languages used to simplify the process of creating dynamic web pages. Two popular choices are Pug and Slim Lang. While both serve a similar purpose, there are distinct differences between the two that make them unique in their own ways.

1. **Syntax**: Pug uses significant whitespace and indentation to determine the structure of the document, resembling Python-like syntax. On the other hand, Slim Lang employs a minimalistic syntax with fewer characters and special symbols, making it cleaner and more concise in nature.

2. **Line Breaks**: Pug automatically adds line breaks and rearranges the code to maintain a clean and organized structure. In contrast, Slim Lang requires explicit line breaks and indentation to separate elements, giving developers more control over the layout of their code.

3. **Extensions**: Pug offers various programming constructs and features such as variables, conditionals, and loops, making it a versatile choice for complex projects. Slim Lang, on the other hand, focuses on simplicity and minimalism, limiting the number of features available for developers.

4. **HTML Output**: Pug generates HTML code that closely reflects the structure of the Pug template, including the use of semantic elements and indentation. Slim Lang, however, translates its concise syntax directly into HTML without preserving the original formatting, resulting in more compact output.

5. **Community Support**: Pug has a larger and more established community of developers, providing extensive documentation, tutorials, and plugins for users to enhance their projects. Slim Lang, while less popular, has a dedicated following that appreciates its streamlined approach to templating.

6. **Integration**: Pug can be seamlessly integrated with popular JavaScript frameworks like Node.js and Express, offering a unified ecosystem for server-side rendering. On the other hand, Slim Lang is often used in Ruby on Rails applications, leveraging the strengths of the Ruby programming language for web development.

In Summary, Pug and Slim Lang differ in syntax, line breaks, extensions, HTML output, community support, and integration, each offering unique advantages for developers based on their preferences and project requirements.
Get Advice from developers at your company using StackShare Enterprise. Sign up for StackShare Enterprise.
Learn More
Pros of Pug
Pros of Slim Lang
  • 138
    Elegant html
  • 90
    Great with nodejs
  • 59
    Open source
  • 59
    Very short syntax
  • 54
    Structured with indentation
  • 25
    Free
  • 6
    Really similar to Slim (from Ruby fame)
  • 6
    It's not HAML
  • 6
    Gulp
  • 5
    Clean syntax
  • 5
    Readable code
  • 5
    Easy setup
  • 5
    Difficult For Front End Developers,learn backend
  • 4
    Disdain for angled brackets
  • 13
    Easier to type and maintain than haml
  • 12
    Very clean and logical
  • 9
    Integrates with Rails by installing a single gem
  • 8
    Performs better than haml
  • 4
    Concise
  • 3
    Extensive package support in sublime text 2 and 3
  • 1
    Atom package support

Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions

Cons of Pug
Cons of Slim Lang
    Be the first to leave a con
    • 2
      Not so good editor support
    • 1
      Overcomplicated syntax
    • 1
      Lots of syntactic corner cases
    • 1
      Easy to break nesting when reindenting or copy-pasting

    Sign up to add or upvote consMake informed product decisions

    - No public GitHub repository available -

    What is Pug?

    This project was formerly known as "Jade." Pug is a high performance template engine heavily influenced by Haml and implemented with JavaScript for Node.js and browsers.

    What is Slim Lang?

    Slim is a template language whose goal is to reduce the view syntax to the essential parts without becoming cryptic. It started as an exercise to see how much could be removed from a standard html template (<, >, closing tags, etc...). As more people took an interest in Slim, the functionality grew and so did the flexibility of the syntax.

    Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

    What companies use Pug?
    What companies use Slim Lang?
    See which teams inside your own company are using Pug or Slim Lang.
    Sign up for StackShare EnterpriseLearn More

    Sign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions

    What tools integrate with Pug?
    What tools integrate with Slim Lang?

    Sign up to get full access to all the tool integrationsMake informed product decisions

    Blog Posts

    Jun 19 2015 at 6:37AM

    ReadMe.io

    JavaScriptGitHubNode.js+25
    12
    2344
    What are some alternatives to Pug and Slim Lang?
    EJS
    It is a simple templating language that lets you generate HTML markup with plain JavaScript. No religiousness about how to organize things. No reinvention of iteration and control-flow. It's just plain JavaScript.
    Handlebars.js
    Handlebars.js is an extension to the Mustache templating language created by Chris Wanstrath. Handlebars.js and Mustache are both logicless templating languages that keep the view and the code separated like we all know they should be.
    React
    Lots of people use React as the V in MVC. Since React makes no assumptions about the rest of your technology stack, it's easy to try it out on a small feature in an existing project.
    TypeScript
    TypeScript is a language for application-scale JavaScript development. It's a typed superset of JavaScript that compiles to plain JavaScript.
    Smarty
    Facilitating the separation of presentation (HTML/CSS) from application logic. This implies that PHP code is application logic, and is separated from the presentation
    See all alternatives