Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

Puppeteer

642
579
+ 1
26
wkhtmltopdf

57
110
+ 1
0
Add tool

Puppeteer vs wkhtmltopdf: What are the differences?

Key Differences between Puppeteer and wkhtmltopdf

Puppeteer and wkhtmltopdf are both powerful tools used for automating the creation of PDF files from websites. However, there are several key differences between them that make each tool unique and suitable for different use cases.

  1. Execution Environment: Puppeteer is a Node.js library developed by the Chrome team, allowing for the automated control of a headless Chrome or Chromium browser. On the other hand, wkhtmltopdf is a command-line tool that utilizes the WebKit rendering engine for PDF generation.

  2. Control and Manipulation: Puppeteer provides extensive control and manipulation over the web page before generating the PDF. This includes actions like clicking buttons, filling forms, taking screenshots, and even generating complex charts and visualizations. In contrast, wkhtmltopdf has limited control over the web page and relies on the HTML and CSS provided.

  3. CSS Support: Puppeteer leverages the full power of the Chrome browser, which has excellent CSS support. It can handle modern CSS features like Flexbox, CSS Grid, and CSS variables. In comparison, wkhtmltopdf has a limited subset of CSS properties and might not support some advanced features.

  4. JavaScript Execution: Puppeteer allows for the execution of JavaScript on the page, enabling dynamic content generation or interaction with APIs. This capability makes it suitable for scenarios where data needs to be processed or fetched before generating the PDF. Wkhtmltopdf, on the other hand, does not execute JavaScript by default, which can limit its capabilities when dealing with dynamic content.

  5. Dependencies and Installation: Puppeteer is a package that includes Chromium, so it does not require any external dependencies. Installing Puppeteer is straightforward and can be done using npm. In contrast, wkhtmltopdf requires the installation of external dependencies like Qt libraries, X11 libraries, and others, which can be more complex and platform-dependent.

  6. Ease of Use: Puppeteer provides a more user-friendly and developer-focused API for generating PDFs. It has extensive documentation, a vibrant community, and supports multiple programming languages. Wkhtmltopdf, being a command-line tool, might have a steeper learning curve for developers less familiar with the command line.

In summary, Puppeteer is a powerful and flexible library for PDF generation that provides extensive control over web pages, executes JavaScript, and has excellent CSS support. On the other hand, wkhtmltopdf is a command-line tool that relies on external dependencies, has limited control over the web page, and lacks advanced CSS and JavaScript execution capabilities.

Advice on Puppeteer and wkhtmltopdf
Ankur Loriya
Needs advice
on
PhantomJSPhantomJS
and
PuppeteerPuppeteer

I am using Node 12 for server scripting and have a function to generate PDF and send it to a browser. Currently, we are using PhantomJS to generate a PDF. Some web post shows that we can achieve PDF generation using Puppeteer. I was a bit confused. Should we move to puppeteerJS? Which one is better with NodeJS for generating PDF?

See more
Replies (2)
Recommends
on
PuppeteerPuppeteer

You better go with puppeteer. It is basically chrome automation tool, written in nodejs. So what you get is PDF, generated by chrome itself. I guess there is hardly better PDF generation tool for the web. Phantomjs is already more or less outdated as technology. It uses some old webkit port that's quite behind in terms of standards and features. It can be replaced with puppeteer for every single task.

See more
Recommends
on
PuppeteerPuppeteer

I suggest puppeteer to go for. It is simple and easy to set up. Only limitaiton is it can be used only for chrome browser and currently they are looking into expanding into FF. The next thing is Playwright which is just a scale up of Puppeteer. It supports cross browsers.

See more
Manage your open source components, licenses, and vulnerabilities
Learn More
Pros of Puppeteer
Pros of wkhtmltopdf
  • 10
    Very well documented
  • 10
    Scriptable web browser
  • 6
    Promise based
    Be the first to leave a pro

    Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions

    Cons of Puppeteer
    Cons of wkhtmltopdf
    • 10
      Chrome only
      Be the first to leave a con

      Sign up to add or upvote consMake informed product decisions

      - No public GitHub repository available -

      What is Puppeteer?

      Puppeteer is a Node library which provides a high-level API to control headless Chrome over the DevTools Protocol. It can also be configured to use full (non-headless) Chrome.

      What is wkhtmltopdf?

      wkhtmltopdf and wkhtmltoimage are command line tools to render HTML into PDF and various image formats using the QT Webkit rendering engine. These run entirely "headless" and do not require a display or display service.

      Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

      What companies use Puppeteer?
      What companies use wkhtmltopdf?
      Manage your open source components, licenses, and vulnerabilities
      Learn More

      Sign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions

      What tools integrate with Puppeteer?
      What tools integrate with wkhtmltopdf?

      Sign up to get full access to all the tool integrationsMake informed product decisions

      Blog Posts

      What are some alternatives to Puppeteer and wkhtmltopdf?
      Chef
      Chef enables you to manage and scale cloud infrastructure with no downtime or interruptions. Freely move applications and configurations from one cloud to another. Chef is integrated with all major cloud providers including Amazon EC2, VMWare, IBM Smartcloud, Rackspace, OpenStack, Windows Azure, HP Cloud, Google Compute Engine, Joyent Cloud and others.
      Selenium
      Selenium automates browsers. That's it! What you do with that power is entirely up to you. Primarily, it is for automating web applications for testing purposes, but is certainly not limited to just that. Boring web-based administration tasks can (and should!) also be automated as well.
      Salt
      Salt is a new approach to infrastructure management. Easy enough to get running in minutes, scalable enough to manage tens of thousands of servers, and fast enough to communicate with them in seconds. Salt delivers a dynamic communication bus for infrastructures that can be used for orchestration, remote execution, configuration management and much more.
      Puppet Labs
      Puppet is an automated administrative engine for your Linux, Unix, and Windows systems and performs administrative tasks (such as adding users, installing packages, and updating server configurations) based on a centralized specification.
      Ansible
      Ansible is an IT automation tool. It can configure systems, deploy software, and orchestrate more advanced IT tasks such as continuous deployments or zero downtime rolling updates. Ansible’s goals are foremost those of simplicity and maximum ease of use.
      See all alternatives