StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Frameworks
  4. Cross Platform Mobile Development
  5. PyQt vs pygame

PyQt vs pygame

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

PyQt
PyQt
Stacks60
Followers132
Votes0
pygame
pygame
Stacks122
Followers173
Votes5
GitHub Stars0
Forks0

PyQt vs pygame: What are the differences?

Introduction

In this article, we will discuss the key differences between PyQt and pygame, two popular libraries for developing graphical user interfaces (GUI) in Python.

  1. Structure and Purpose: PyQt is a Python binding for the Qt application framework, which allows developers to create cross-platform GUI applications. It provides a wide range of components and functionalities for building professional-looking interfaces. On the other hand, pygame is a set of Python modules designed for game development and multimedia applications. It focuses specifically on providing tools and features for creating 2D games and interactive multimedia projects.

  2. Complexity: PyQt offers a more extensive and complex set of features compared to pygame. It is a robust and comprehensive framework that provides advanced functionalities, such as built-in support for 2D and 3D graphics, multimedia elements, networking capabilities, and internationalization support. This makes it suitable for developing complex and feature-rich applications with sophisticated user interfaces. Meanwhile, pygame has a simpler and more straightforward design, concentrating primarily on game-related functionalities like handling graphics, animations, sound, and input events.

  3. Learning Curve: Due to its extensive features and capabilities, PyQt has a steeper learning curve compared to pygame. It requires a solid understanding of the Qt framework and its various components. PyQt also follows a more object-oriented programming (OOP) approach, where developers need to understand concepts like signals and slots, model-view-controller (MVC) architecture, and event-driven programming. In contrast, pygame is relatively easier to pick up, especially for beginners, as it has a simpler API and focuses more on game development concepts.

  4. Cross-Platform Support: One of the significant advantages of PyQt is its excellent cross-platform compatibility. It allows developers to write code once and deploy their applications on multiple platforms, including Windows, Mac OS, Linux, and even mobile platforms like iOS and Android. PyQt provides native look and feel on each platform, ensuring a consistent and intuitive user experience. Conversely, pygame is also cross-platform compatible but has limited support for mobile platforms. It is primarily designed for desktop environments and lacks some of the platform-specific applications programming interface (API) integrations provided by PyQt.

  5. Documentation and Community: PyQt benefits from extensive documentation and an active community of developers due to its association with the Qt framework. The official PyQt documentation is comprehensive, well-maintained, and comes with detailed tutorials, examples, and references. The Qt community is vast and provides additional resources, forums, and support. While pygame also has documentation and a community, it may not be as extensive as PyQt's due to the difference in their popularity and user base.

In Summary, PyQt and pygame differ in terms of their purpose, complexity, learning curve, cross-platform support, and documentation. PyQt is a comprehensive GUI framework suited for building robust applications, whereas pygame focuses on game development with a simpler design and API.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

PyQt
PyQt
pygame
pygame

It is a set of Python v2 and v3 bindings for Qt application framework and runs on all platforms supported by Qt including Windows, OS X, Linux, iOS and Android. PyQt5 supports Qt v5. PyQt4 supports Qt v4 and will build against Qt v5. The bindings are implemented as a set of Python modules and contain over 1,000 classes.

It is a cross-platform set of Python modules designed for writing video games. It includes computer graphics and sound libraries designed to be used with the Python programming language.

runs on all platforms; bindings for Qt application framework
Highly portable; Runs on nearly every platform and operating system
Statistics
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Stars
0
GitHub Forks
-
GitHub Forks
0
Stacks
60
Stacks
122
Followers
132
Followers
173
Votes
0
Votes
5
Pros & Cons
No community feedback yet
Pros
  • 3
    Easy to install
  • 1
    Simple
  • 1
    Lightweigt by only being 12 mb
Cons
  • 2
    Has only 2d
  • 1
    Slow
Integrations
Windows
Windows
Linux Mint
Linux Mint
Linux
Linux
Python
Python
JetBrains Rider
JetBrains Rider
Ninject
Ninject
PlayFab
PlayFab
TestFairy
TestFairy
Vuforia
Vuforia

What are some alternatives to PyQt, pygame?

Ionic

Ionic

Free and open source, Ionic offers a library of mobile and desktop-optimized HTML, CSS and JS components for building highly interactive apps. Use with Angular, React, Vue, or plain JavaScript.

Flutter

Flutter

Flutter is a mobile app SDK to help developers and designers build modern mobile apps for iOS and Android.

React Native

React Native

React Native enables you to build world-class application experiences on native platforms using a consistent developer experience based on JavaScript and React. The focus of React Native is on developer efficiency across all the platforms you care about - learn once, write anywhere. Facebook uses React Native in multiple production apps and will continue investing in React Native.

Xamarin

Xamarin

Xamarin’s Mono-based products enable .NET developers to use their existing code, libraries and tools (including Visual Studio*), as well as skills in .NET and the C# programming language, to create mobile applications for the industry’s most widely-used mobile devices, including Android-based smartphones and tablets, iPhone, iPad and iPod Touch.

NativeScript

NativeScript

NativeScript enables developers to build native apps for iOS, Android and Windows Universal while sharing the application code across the platforms. When building the application UI, developers use our libraries, which abstract the differences between the native platforms.

Apache Cordova

Apache Cordova

Apache Cordova is a set of device APIs that allow a mobile app developer to access native device function such as the camera or accelerometer from JavaScript. Combined with a UI framework such as jQuery Mobile or Dojo Mobile or Sencha Touch, this allows a smartphone app to be developed with just HTML, CSS, and JavaScript.

Framework7

Framework7

It is a free and open source mobile HTML framework to develop hybrid mobile apps or web apps with iOS native look and feel. All you need to make it work is a simple HTML layout and attached framework's CSS and JS files.

Electron

Electron

With Electron, creating a desktop application for your company or idea is easy. Initially developed for GitHub's Atom editor, Electron has since been used to create applications by companies like Microsoft, Facebook, Slack, and Docker. The Electron framework lets you write cross-platform desktop applications using JavaScript, HTML and CSS. It is based on io.js and Chromium and is used in the Atom editor.

Qt

Qt

Qt, a leading cross-platform application and UI framework. With Qt, you can develop applications once and deploy to leading desktop, embedded & mobile targets.

PhoneGap

PhoneGap

PhoneGap is a web platform that exposes native mobile device apis and data to JavaScript. PhoneGap is a distribution of Apache Cordova. PhoneGap allows you to use standard web technologies such as HTML5, CSS3, and JavaScript for cross-platform development, avoiding each mobile platforms' native development language. Applications execute within wrappers targeted to each platform, and rely on standards-compliant API bindings to access each device's sensors, data, and network status.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase