StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Frameworks
  4. Front End Frameworks
  5. Quasar Framework vs Vue CLI

Quasar Framework vs Vue CLI

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Vue CLI
Vue CLI
Stacks433
Followers471
Votes3
GitHub Stars29.7K
Forks6.3K
Quasar Framework
Quasar Framework
Stacks451
Followers771
Votes404
GitHub Stars26.9K
Forks3.7K

Quasar Framework vs Vue CLI: What are the differences?

Introduction

Quasar Framework and Vue CLI are two popular tools used for developing web applications using Vue.js. While both frameworks are built on top of Vue.js, there are several key differences between them that make them suitable for different use cases.

  1. Project Structure: Quasar Framework has a more complex project structure compared to Vue CLI. It provides a comprehensive set of pre-configured features out of the box, such as a preset CLI, extensive CLI commands, and a flexible folder structure. On the other hand, Vue CLI has a simpler project structure and focuses on providing a minimal setup that can be easily customized based on the project requirements.

  2. Component Library: Quasar Framework includes a rich set of UI components that are ready to use out of the box. It has a well-documented component library with a wide range of customizable options, making it easier to build complex UIs. Vue CLI, on the other hand, does not provide a built-in component library and relies on third-party libraries or manual component development.

  3. Development Mode: Quasar Framework provides a feature-rich development mode with live-reloading, hot module replacement, and error handling out of the box. It also includes a powerful dev server with support for HTTPS, proxying, and advanced configuration options. Vue CLI, on the other hand, provides a simpler development mode with basic live-reloading and error handling capabilities.

  4. Build and Deployment: Quasar Framework includes a built-in build and deployment system that supports multiple targets such as SPA, PWA, SSR, and Mobile Apps. It also provides optimized production builds with options for code splitting, lazy loading, and caching. In contrast, Vue CLI focuses on providing a flexible build system that can be easily customized based on specific project requirements.

  5. Testing and Documentation: Quasar Framework includes integrated support for unit testing and end-to-end testing, making it easier to write and run tests for your application. It also provides comprehensive documentation with detailed guides, examples, and API references. Vue CLI, on the other hand, does not include built-in testing support or comprehensive documentation, but it integrates well with popular testing and documentation tools.

  6. Community and Ecosystem: Quasar Framework has its own active community and ecosystem, with a dedicated forum, official documentation, and a wide range of open-source plugins and extensions. It also provides official support and regular updates from the core team. Vue CLI, on the other hand, benefits from the larger Vue.js community and ecosystem, with a wide range of libraries, plugins, and resources available.

In Summary, Quasar Framework offers a more comprehensive and feature-rich development experience with a complex project structure, built-in component library, powerful development mode, and optimized build and deployment system. On the other hand, Vue CLI provides a simpler and more flexible setup, relying on third-party libraries and customization options for component development, build configuration, and testing.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Vue CLI
Vue CLI
Quasar Framework
Quasar Framework

Vue CLI aims to be the standard tooling baseline for the Vue ecosystem. It ensures the various build tools work smoothly together with sensible defaults so you can focus on writing your app instead of spending days wrangling with config.

Build responsive Single Page Apps, SSR Apps, PWAs, Hybrid Mobile Apps and Electron Apps, all using the same codebase!, powered with Vue.

Feature Rich - Out-of-the-box support for Babel, TypeScript, ESLint, PostCSS, PWA, Unit Testing & End-to-end Testing.; Extensible; No Need to Eject;Graphical User Interface;Instant Prototyping;Future Ready
SPAs (Single Page App); SSR (Server-side Rendered App); PWAs (Progressive Web App); Mobile apps (Android, iOS, …); Electron; Vue.js; Full RTL support; Persian calendar; Material design 2; Complete documentation; Unit test ready
Statistics
GitHub Stars
29.7K
GitHub Stars
26.9K
GitHub Forks
6.3K
GitHub Forks
3.7K
Stacks
433
Stacks
451
Followers
471
Followers
771
Votes
3
Votes
404
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 1
    Detects and run npm tasks
  • 1
    GUI for installing dependencies
  • 1
    Visual Web Interface
Pros
  • 59
    Excellent documentation
  • 44
    Deploy one codebase to web, desktop, mobile, and more
  • 40
    Lots of UI components
  • 39
    Extensive collection of components
  • 33
    Being able to bundle for almost all platform is awesome
Cons
  • 4
    Stackoverflow 1.5k Questions
Integrations
TypeScript
TypeScript
Babel
Babel
Apache Cordova
Apache Cordova
ESLint
ESLint
Linux
Linux
Electron
Electron
macOS
macOS
Windows
Windows
Vue.js
Vue.js
Material Design
Material Design

What are some alternatives to Vue CLI, Quasar Framework?

Bootstrap

Bootstrap

Bootstrap is the most popular HTML, CSS, and JS framework for developing responsive, mobile first projects on the web.

Foundation

Foundation

Foundation is the most advanced responsive front-end framework in the world. You can quickly prototype and build sites or apps that work on any kind of device with Foundation, which includes layout constructs (like a fully responsive grid), elements and best practices.

Semantic UI

Semantic UI

Semantic empowers designers and developers by creating a shared vocabulary for UI.

Materialize

Materialize

A CSS Framework based on material design.

Material Design for Angular

Material Design for Angular

Material Design is a specification for a unified system of visual, motion, and interaction design that adapts across different devices. Our goal is to deliver a lean, lightweight set of AngularJS-native UI elements that implement the material design system for use in Angular SPAs.

Material-UI

Material-UI

Material UI is a library of React UI components that implements Google's Material Design.

Blazor

Blazor

Blazor is a .NET web framework that runs in any browser. You author Blazor apps using C#/Razor and HTML.

Nuxt.js

Nuxt.js

Nuxt.js presets all the configuration needed to make your development of a Vue.js application enjoyable. You can use Nuxt.js for SSR, SPA, Static Generated, PWA and more.

Underscore

Underscore

A JavaScript library that provides a whole mess of useful functional programming helpers without extending any built-in objects.

UIkIt

UIkIt

UIkit gives you a comprehensive collection of HTML, CSS, and JS components which is simple to use, easy to customize and extendable.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase