StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Frameworks
  4. Front End Frameworks
  5. Vue CLI vs react-three-fiber

Vue CLI vs react-three-fiber

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Vue CLI
Vue CLI
Stacks433
Followers471
Votes3
GitHub Stars29.7K
Forks6.3K
react-three-fiber
react-three-fiber
Stacks52
Followers46
Votes0

Vue CLI vs react-three-fiber: What are the differences?

Introduction

In this markdown code, we will discuss the key differences between Vue CLI and react-three-fiber. Vue CLI is a command-line interface for quickly scaffolding Vue.js projects, while react-three-fiber is a library that allows for building 3D graphics and animations using React.js.

  1. Setup and Configuration:

    • Vue CLI provides a comprehensive setup and configuration system out of the box, allowing developers to easily set up a Vue.js project with all the necessary dependencies and a development server. On the other hand, react-three-fiber does not have a CLI tool for project setup and configuration. Developers need to manually configure their React.js project to use react-three-fiber and other related libraries.
  2. Component Structure and Syntax:

    • Vue CLI follows a familiar component-based structure, where a single file contains the template, script, and styles for a component. This allows for a more cohesive and intuitive development experience. On the other hand, react-three-fiber follows the JSX syntax used in React.js, which separates the HTML-like syntax (JSX) from the JavaScript logic. This syntax can be a bit more complex for developers who are unfamiliar with React.js.
  3. Flexibility and Scalability:

    • Vue CLI provides a flexible and scalable architecture for building large-scale applications. It offers features like Vuex for state management and Vue Router for handling client-side routing. On the other hand, react-three-fiber is a lightweight library focused on creating 3D graphics and animations. While it can be used in large-scale applications, it does not provide built-in solutions for state management or routing.
  4. Community and Ecosystem:

    • Vue CLI has a large and active community, which means there are plenty of resources, tutorials, and plugins available for developers to use. It also has an extensive ecosystem of official and community-supported libraries and tools. On the other hand, react-three-fiber has a smaller but growing community. While there are fewer resources and plugins available compared to Vue CLI, it still has a decent ecosystem that continues to expand.
  5. Performance and Rendering:

    • Vue CLI leverages the Virtual DOM (VDOM) technology, which allows for efficient updates to the user interface by minimizing the number of actual DOM manipulations. This results in better performance and rendering speed compared to traditional DOM manipulation. On the other hand, react-three-fiber utilizes WebGL under the hood, which provides hardware-accelerated rendering for 3D graphics and animations. This allows for smooth rendering of complex 3D scenes and high-performance animations.
  6. Learning Curve and Documentation:

    • Vue CLI is known for its easy learning curve, especially for developers who are already familiar with HTML, CSS, and JavaScript. Its documentation is comprehensive and beginner-friendly, making it easier for developers to get started. On the other hand, react-three-fiber has a steeper learning curve, especially for developers who are not familiar with React.js. Its documentation is also detailed but may require a deeper understanding of React.js concepts.

In summary, Vue CLI provides a comprehensive setup and configuration system, follows a familiar component structure, and offers a flexible architecture with a large and active community. On the other hand, react-three-fiber focuses on creating 3D graphics and animations using React.js, leveraging WebGL for high-performance rendering, but requires more manual configuration and has a smaller community.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Vue CLI
Vue CLI
react-three-fiber
react-three-fiber

Vue CLI aims to be the standard tooling baseline for the Vue ecosystem. It ensures the various build tools work smoothly together with sensible defaults so you can focus on writing your app instead of spending days wrangling with config.

It is a React renderer for Threejs on the web and react-native. Rendering performance is up to Threejs and the GPU. Components participate in the renderloop outside of React, without any additional overhead.

Feature Rich - Out-of-the-box support for Babel, TypeScript, ESLint, PostCSS, PWA, Unit Testing & End-to-end Testing.; Extensible; No Need to Eject;Graphical User Interface;Instant Prototyping;Future Ready
React renderer for Three.js; Web and react-native
Statistics
GitHub Stars
29.7K
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Forks
6.3K
GitHub Forks
-
Stacks
433
Stacks
52
Followers
471
Followers
46
Votes
3
Votes
0
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 1
    GUI for installing dependencies
  • 1
    Detects and run npm tasks
  • 1
    Visual Web Interface
No community feedback yet
Integrations
TypeScript
TypeScript
Babel
Babel
Apache Cordova
Apache Cordova
ESLint
ESLint
React
React
three.js
three.js

What are some alternatives to Vue CLI, react-three-fiber?

Bootstrap

Bootstrap

Bootstrap is the most popular HTML, CSS, and JS framework for developing responsive, mobile first projects on the web.

Foundation

Foundation

Foundation is the most advanced responsive front-end framework in the world. You can quickly prototype and build sites or apps that work on any kind of device with Foundation, which includes layout constructs (like a fully responsive grid), elements and best practices.

Semantic UI

Semantic UI

Semantic empowers designers and developers by creating a shared vocabulary for UI.

Materialize

Materialize

A CSS Framework based on material design.

Material Design for Angular

Material Design for Angular

Material Design is a specification for a unified system of visual, motion, and interaction design that adapts across different devices. Our goal is to deliver a lean, lightweight set of AngularJS-native UI elements that implement the material design system for use in Angular SPAs.

Material-UI

Material-UI

Material UI is a library of React UI components that implements Google's Material Design.

Blazor

Blazor

Blazor is a .NET web framework that runs in any browser. You author Blazor apps using C#/Razor and HTML.

Quasar Framework

Quasar Framework

Build responsive Single Page Apps, SSR Apps, PWAs, Hybrid Mobile Apps and Electron Apps, all using the same codebase!, powered with Vue.

Nuxt.js

Nuxt.js

Nuxt.js presets all the configuration needed to make your development of a Vue.js application enjoyable. You can use Nuxt.js for SSR, SPA, Static Generated, PWA and more.

Underscore

Underscore

A JavaScript library that provides a whole mess of useful functional programming helpers without extending any built-in objects.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase