StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. In-Memory Databases
  4. In Memory Databases
  5. Redis vs Sidekiq

Redis vs Sidekiq

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Redis
Redis
Stacks61.9K
Followers46.5K
Votes3.9K
GitHub Stars42
Forks6
Sidekiq
Sidekiq
Stacks1.2K
Followers632
Votes408

Redis vs Sidekiq: What are the differences?

Introduction Redis and Sidekiq are popular tools used in web development. While Redis is an in-memory data structure store, Sidekiq is a background processing framework for Ruby applications. These tools serve different purposes in a web application and have distinct features and functionalities.

  1. Scalability and Performance: Redis is known for its high performance and scalability. It can handle millions of requests per second and provides efficient data storage and retrieval. On the other hand, Sidekiq leverages Redis as a backend for storing background job information. It allows developers to perform asynchronous processing and offload time-consuming tasks from the main application thread to improve performance.

  2. Data Structure Store vs. Background Processing: Redis primarily functions as an in-memory data structure store, providing key-value storage, sets, lists, and other data structures. It allows for rapid data access and can be used as a database, cache, or message broker. In contrast, Sidekiq focuses on background job processing, enabling developers to execute tasks asynchronously outside the normal web request-response flow.

  3. Concurrency Model: Redis implements a single-threaded, event-driven architecture, where it can handle multiple client connections concurrently due to its non-blocking I/O operations. This makes Redis highly efficient for handling numerous requests simultaneously. In contrast, Sidekiq adopts a multi-threaded approach, utilizing multiple worker threads to process background jobs concurrently. This enables Sidekiq to achieve high throughput and perform efficient task execution.

  4. Job Scheduling: Redis provides basic job scheduling functionality through its Pub/Sub mechanism. Developers can publish messages to channels and set expiration times for them, effectively achieving delayed job execution. However, Sidekiq offers more advanced job scheduling capabilities, including periodic recurring jobs and scheduled retries. It provides flexibility in scheduling tasks based on specific time intervals, cron-like expressions, or specific dates.

  5. Monitoring and Administration: Redis provides built-in monitoring capabilities through its INFO command, allowing users to retrieve various runtime information and statistics about the server. However, Sidekiq offers a more comprehensive monitoring and administration interface. It provides a web-based dashboard that displays detailed information about job queues, processed and failed jobs, worker performance, and system utilization. Additionally, Sidekiq offers retry, retry throttling, and job prioritization features, enhancing job management and monitoring.

  6. Integration and Ecosystem: Redis has a wide range of client libraries and language bindings available, making it easy to integrate with various programming languages and frameworks. It has been extensively adopted and integrated into many software stacks. Similarly, Sidekiq integrates well with Ruby on Rails applications, providing Active Job compatibility and seamless integration with Rails conventions. This allows developers to easily incorporate background jobs into their Ruby projects.

In Summary, Redis is a high-performance data structure store that can be used for caching, database, or message broker purposes. Sidekiq, on the other hand, is a background processing framework specialized in executing tasks asynchronously and offloading time-consuming processes. It offers advanced job scheduling, monitoring, and administration features, making it suitable for efficient and scalable background job processing.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Redis
Redis
Sidekiq
Sidekiq

Redis is an open source (BSD licensed), in-memory data structure store, used as a database, cache, and message broker. Redis provides data structures such as strings, hashes, lists, sets, sorted sets with range queries, bitmaps, hyperloglogs, geospatial indexes, and streams.

Sidekiq uses threads to handle many jobs at the same time in the same process. It does not require Rails but will integrate tightly with Rails 3/4 to make background processing dead simple.

Statistics
GitHub Stars
42
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Forks
6
GitHub Forks
-
Stacks
61.9K
Stacks
1.2K
Followers
46.5K
Followers
632
Votes
3.9K
Votes
408
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 888
    Performance
  • 542
    Super fast
  • 514
    Ease of use
  • 444
    In-memory cache
  • 324
    Advanced key-value cache
Cons
  • 15
    Cannot query objects directly
  • 3
    No secondary indexes for non-numeric data types
  • 1
    No WAL
Pros
  • 124
    Simple
  • 99
    Efficient background processing
  • 60
    Scalability
  • 37
    Better then resque
  • 26
    Great documentation

What are some alternatives to Redis, Sidekiq?

Beanstalkd

Beanstalkd

Beanstalks's interface is generic, but was originally designed for reducing the latency of page views in high-volume web applications by running time-consuming tasks asynchronously.

Hazelcast

Hazelcast

With its various distributed data structures, distributed caching capabilities, elastic nature, memcache support, integration with Spring and Hibernate and more importantly with so many happy users, Hazelcast is feature-rich, enterprise-ready and developer-friendly in-memory data grid solution.

Aerospike

Aerospike

Aerospike is an open-source, modern database built from the ground up to push the limits of flash storage, processors and networks. It was designed to operate with predictable low latency at high throughput with uncompromising reliability – both high availability and ACID guarantees.

MemSQL

MemSQL

MemSQL converges transactions and analytics for sub-second data processing and reporting. Real-time businesses can build robust applications on a simple and scalable infrastructure that complements and extends existing data pipelines.

Apache Ignite

Apache Ignite

It is a memory-centric distributed database, caching, and processing platform for transactional, analytical, and streaming workloads delivering in-memory speeds at petabyte scale

SAP HANA

SAP HANA

It is an application that uses in-memory database technology that allows the processing of massive amounts of real-time data in a short time. The in-memory computing engine allows it to process data stored in RAM as opposed to reading it from a disk.

VoltDB

VoltDB

VoltDB is a fundamental redesign of the RDBMS that provides unparalleled performance and scalability on bare-metal, virtualized and cloud infrastructures. VoltDB is a modern in-memory architecture that supports both SQL + Java with data durability and fault tolerance.

Hangfire

Hangfire

It is an open-source framework that helps you to create, process and manage your background jobs, i.e. operations you don't want to put in your request processing pipeline. It supports all kind of background tasks – short-running and long-running, CPU intensive and I/O intensive, one shot and recurrent.

Resque

Resque

Background jobs can be any Ruby class or module that responds to perform. Your existing classes can easily be converted to background jobs or you can create new classes specifically to do work. Or, you can do both.

Tarantool

Tarantool

It is designed to give you the flexibility, scalability, and performance that you want, as well as the reliability and manageability that you need in mission-critical applications

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase