StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Frameworks
  4. Concurrency Frameworks
  5. Redux vs RxJS

Redux vs RxJS

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

RxJS
RxJS
Stacks4.4K
Followers638
Votes21
GitHub Stars19.4K
Forks2.1K
Redux
Redux
Stacks32.0K
Followers23.6K
Votes674

Redux vs RxJS: What are the differences?

Both Redux and RxJS are popular libraries used in JavaScript web development, but they serve different purposes and offer different functionalities. Let's explore the key differences between Redux and RxJS:

  1. State Management vs. Reactive Programming: The primary difference between Redux and RxJS lies in their core functionalities. Redux is a state management library that provides a predictable and centralized approach to managing application state. On the other hand, RxJS is a reactive programming library that allows developers to work with asynchronous and event-based data streams.

  2. Immutable vs. Mutable State: Redux follows an immutable data pattern, where the state is read-only and can only be modified through pure functions called reducers. This ensures a consistent and predictable state management process. In contrast, RxJS does not enforce immutability on its own. Developers are responsible for handling mutable state and managing state changes through operators and stream transformations.

  3. Unidirectional Data Flow vs. Reactive Data Flow: Redux follows a strict unidirectional data flow, where actions trigger state updates through reducers, and components subscribe to these state changes. This creates a predictable flow of data, making it easier to reason about application state changes. In RxJS, data flows reactively through observables. Components can subscribe to observables and react to changes as they occur, providing a more flexible and dynamic data flow.

  4. UI-focused vs. General-purpose Data Handling: Redux is primarily focused on handling application state for UI-related concerns. It provides a centralized store for managing state changes and facilitates UI updates accordingly. RxJS, on the other hand, is a general-purpose library that enables reactive programming for various types of data streams, not limited to UI-related events.

  5. Middleware vs. Operators: Redux offers middleware as a way to extend its functionality and introduce additional behavior in the data flow process. Middleware can intercept actions, perform side effects, and modify the payload before reaching the reducers. RxJS, however, provides operators that allow developers to transform, filter, combine, and manipulate data streams in a reactive manner, without the need for middleware.

  6. Library vs. Language Extension: Redux is a standalone library that can be used with any JavaScript framework or library. It provides its own set of concepts and abstractions for managing state. On the other hand, RxJS is an extension of the ReactiveX family of libraries, available in multiple programming languages. It brings the power of reactive programming to JavaScript, allowing developers to work with observables and leverage its functional programming capabilities.

In summary, Redux is a state management library focused on providing a predictable and centralized approach to managing application state, while RxJS is a reactive programming library that enables developers to work with asynchronous and event-based data streams.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

RxJS
RxJS
Redux
Redux

RxJS is a library for reactive programming using Observables, to make it easier to compose asynchronous or callback-based code. This project is a rewrite of Reactive-Extensions/RxJS with better performance, better modularity, better debuggable call stacks, while staying mostly backwards compatible, with some breaking changes that reduce the API surface.

It helps you write applications that behave consistently, run in different environments (client, server, and native), and are easy to test. t provides a great experience, such as live code editing combined with a time traveling debugger.

-
Predictable state; Easy testing; Works with other view layers besides React
Statistics
GitHub Stars
19.4K
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Forks
2.1K
GitHub Forks
-
Stacks
4.4K
Stacks
32.0K
Followers
638
Followers
23.6K
Votes
21
Votes
674
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 6
    Easier async data chaining and combining
  • 3
    Steep learning curve, but offers predictable operations
  • 2
    Easier testing
  • 2
    Observable subjects
  • 2
    Ability to build your own stream
Cons
  • 3
    Steep learning curve
Pros
  • 191
    State is predictable
  • 150
    Plays well with React and others
  • 126
    State stored in a single object tree
  • 79
    Hot reloading out of the box
  • 74
    Allows for time travel
Cons
  • 13
    Lots of boilerplate
  • 6
    Verbose
  • 5
    Design
  • 5
    Steep learning curve
  • 4
    Steeper learning curve than RxJs
Integrations
No integrations available
JavaScript
JavaScript
React
React

What are some alternatives to RxJS, Redux?

MobX

MobX

MobX is a battle tested library that makes state management simple and scalable by transparently applying functional reactive programming (TFRP). React and MobX together are a powerful combination. React renders the application state by providing mechanisms to translate it into a tree of renderable components. MobX provides the mechanism to store and update the application state that React then uses.

Akka

Akka

Akka is a toolkit and runtime for building highly concurrent, distributed, and resilient message-driven applications on the JVM.

Orleans

Orleans

Orleans is a framework that provides a straightforward approach to building distributed high-scale computing applications, without the need to learn and apply complex concurrency or other scaling patterns. It was created by Microsoft Research and designed for use in the cloud.

Zustand

Zustand

Small, fast and scaleable bearbones state-management solution. Has a comfy api based on hooks, that isn't boilerplatey or opinionated, but still just enough to be explicit and flux-like.

Effector

Effector

It is an effective multi-store state manager for Javascript apps, that allows you to manage data in complex applications.

Netty

Netty

Netty is a NIO client server framework which enables quick and easy development of network applications such as protocol servers and clients. It greatly simplifies and streamlines network programming such as TCP and UDP socket server.

Finagle

Finagle

Finagle is an extensible RPC system for the JVM, used to construct high-concurrency servers. Finagle implements uniform client and server APIs for several protocols, and is designed for high performance and concurrency.

redux-saga

redux-saga

An alternative side effect model for Redux apps

vuex

vuex

Vuex is a state management pattern + library for Vue.js applications. It serves as a centralized store for all the components in an application, with rules ensuring that the state can only be mutated in a predictable fashion. It also integrates with Vue's official devtools extension to provide advanced features such as zero-config time-travel debugging and state snapshot export / import.

redux-thunk

redux-thunk

Redux Thunk middleware allows you to write action creators that return a function instead of an action. The thunk can be used to delay the dispatch of an action, or to dispatch only if a certain condition is met. The inner function receives the store methods dispatch and getState as parameters.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase