StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Code Review
  4. Code Review
  5. Reek vs RuboCop

Reek vs RuboCop

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

RuboCop
RuboCop
Stacks1.4K
Followers222
Votes41
Reek
Reek
Stacks9
Followers22
Votes0
GitHub Stars4.1K
Forks282

Reek vs RuboCop: What are the differences?

Introduction: Markdown code is a simple formatting language used for writing content that will be published on the web. In this task, the key differences between Reek and RuboCop will be provided in Markdown code format.

  1. Default Configuration: Both Reek and RuboCop have different default configurations. Reek focuses on identifying code smells and provides a set of pre-defined code smell detectors. On the other hand, RuboCop focuses on enforcing the Ruby style guide and comes with a default configuration that follows this guide.

  2. Customization: While both tools allow customization, they differ in the level of customization they offer. Reek allows users to customize the set of code smell detectors and choose which ones to enable or disable. RuboCop, on the other hand, provides a wide range of configuration options for customizing various aspects of the style guide enforcement.

  3. Focus: Reek primarily focuses on detecting code smells, which are indicators of possible design issues or code inefficiencies. It flags methods or classes that are too long, have too many parameters, or exhibit other code smells. RuboCop, on the other hand, focuses on enforcing coding style and best practices, such as indentation, whitespace usage, and naming conventions.

  4. Integration: RuboCop has better integration with popular Ruby development tools and editors, such as RubyMine and Visual Studio Code. It provides convenient integrations that allow developers to run RuboCop checks within their development environment. Reek, on the other hand, may require additional setup or configuration to integrate with specific tools.

  5. Scope: RuboCop is a more comprehensive tool that covers a wide range of style and best practice rules. It aims to provide a consistent and readable codebase. Reek, on the other hand, focuses more on identifying specific code smells and does not cover as many style-related rules.

  6. Ease of Use: RuboCop is considered easier to use for developers who are new to the tool or want a quick setup. It provides clear and concise error messages and can be easily integrated into development workflows. Reek, on the other hand, may have a steeper learning curve due to its focus on code smells and the need to understand the implications of each detected smell.

In Summary, Reek and RuboCop differ in their default configurations, degree of customization, focus (code smells vs. style enforcement), integration capabilities, scope of rules, and ease of use for developers.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on RuboCop, Reek

Weverton
Weverton

CTO at SourceLevel

Aug 10, 2020

Review

To communicate isn’t just getting rid of syntax errors and making code work. The code should communicate ideas to people through a programming language that computers can also understand.

You should adopt semantic variables, classes, modules, and methods names. For instance, in Ruby, we avoid using particular prefixes such as is_paid, get_name and set_name. In their places, we use directly paid?, name, and name=.

My advice is to use idiomatic and features that the programming language you use offers to you whenever possible, and figure out ways to better pass the message.

Why wouldn’t we be worried about semantics, typos, and styles? We should care for the quality of our code, and the many concepts that define it. You can start by using a #linter to collect some issues from your codebase automatically.

116k views116k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

RuboCop
RuboCop
Reek
Reek

RuboCop is a Ruby static code analyzer. Out of the box it will enforce many of the guidelines outlined in the community Ruby Style Guide.

Reek is a tool that examines Ruby classes, modules, and methods and reports any Code Smells it finds.

Statistics
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Stars
4.1K
GitHub Forks
-
GitHub Forks
282
Stacks
1.4K
Stacks
9
Followers
222
Followers
22
Votes
41
Votes
0
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 9
    Open-source
  • 8
    Completely free
  • 7
    Runs Offline
  • 4
    Customizable
  • 4
    Follows the Ruby Style Guide by default
No community feedback yet
Integrations
Ruby
Ruby
Atom
Atom
Sublime Text
Sublime Text
Vim
Vim
TextMate
TextMate
Emacs
Emacs

What are some alternatives to RuboCop, Reek?

Code Climate

Code Climate

After each Git push, Code Climate analyzes your code for complexity, duplication, and common smells to determine changes in quality and surface technical debt hotspots.

Codacy

Codacy

Codacy automates code reviews and monitors code quality on every commit and pull request on more than 40 programming languages reporting back the impact of every commit or PR, issues concerning code style, best practices and security.

Phabricator

Phabricator

Phabricator is a collection of open source web applications that help software companies build better software.

PullReview

PullReview

PullReview helps Ruby and Rails developers to develop new features cleanly, on-time, and with confidence by automatically reviewing their code.

Gerrit Code Review

Gerrit Code Review

Gerrit is a self-hosted pre-commit code review tool. It serves as a Git hosting server with option to comment incoming changes. It is highly configurable and extensible with default guarding policies, webhooks, project access control and more.

SonarQube

SonarQube

SonarQube provides an overview of the overall health of your source code and even more importantly, it highlights issues found on new code. With a Quality Gate set on your project, you will simply fix the Leak and start mechanically improving.

CodeFactor.io

CodeFactor.io

CodeFactor.io automatically and continuously tracks code quality with every GitHub or BitBucket commit and pull request, helping software developers save time in code reviews and efficiently tackle technical debt.

ESLint

ESLint

A pluggable and configurable linter tool for identifying and reporting on patterns in JavaScript. Maintain your code quality with ease.

Amazon CodeGuru

Amazon CodeGuru

It is a machine learning service for automated code reviews and application performance recommendations. It helps you find the most expensive lines of code that hurt application performance and keep you up all night troubleshooting, then gives you specific recommendations to fix or improve your code.

Reviewable

Reviewable

A code review tool for GitHub pull requests inspired by Google's internal tool. Powerful diffing and workflow features wrapped in a beautiful UI, with seamless GitHub integration. Free for public repos.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana