Review Board vs Snyk

Overview

Review Board

Stacks19

Followers52

Votes6

GitHub Stars1.7K

Forks435

Snyk

Stacks580

Followers380

Votes20

Review Board vs Snyk: What are the differences?

Developers describe Review Board as "Stress-free code review for teams of all sizes". Review Board is an open source, web-based code and document review tool built to help companies, open source projects, and other organizations keep their quality high and their bug count low. On the other hand, Snyk is detailed as "Fix vulnerabilities in Node & npm dependencies with a click". Fix vulnerabilities in Node & npm dependencies with a click.

Review Board and Snyk are primarily classified as "Code Review" and "Dependency Monitoring" tools respectively.

Review Board is an open source tool with 1.2K GitHub stars and 359 GitHub forks. Here's a link to Review Board's open source repository on GitHub.

🔥 Trending in Code Review on StackShare

Graphite.dev Code Review

Stacked Diffs on GitHub

Try it View Docs Alternatives

Try

Advice on Review Board, Snyk

Bryan

SRE Manager at Subsplash

Apr 1, 2020

Needs adviceon

WhiteSource

Snyk

Sonatype Nexus

I'm beginning to research the right way to better integrate how we achieve SCA / shift-left / SecureDevOps / secure software supply chain. If you use or have evaluated WhiteSource, Snyk, Sonatype Nexus, SonarQube or similar, I would very much appreciate your perspective on strengths and weaknesses and how you selected your ultimate solution. I want to integrate with GitLab CI.

461k views461k

Comments

Detailed Comparison

Review Board	Snyk
Review Board is an open source, web-based code and document review tool built to help companies, open source projects, and other organizations keep their quality high and their bug count low.	Automatically find & fix vulnerabilities in your code, containers, Kubernetes, and Terraform
Syntax-highlighted diffs; Smarter indentation handling; Moved code detection; Know exactly what function or class you're in; See more context in your diffs; Multi-line commenting in diffs/text files; Track status of automated builds and reviews	-
Statistics
GitHub Stars 1.7K	GitHub Stars -
GitHub Forks 435	GitHub Forks -
Stacks 19	Stacks 580
Followers 52	Followers 380
Votes 6	Votes 20
Pros & Cons
Pros 3 Simple to use. Great UI 1 Diff between review versions 1 Open Source 1 Review Bots	Pros 10 Github Integration 5 Free for open source projects 4 Finds lots of real vulnerabilities 1 Easy to deployed Cons 2 Does not integrated with SonarQube 1 Complex UI 1 No surface monitoring 1 No malware detection 1 False positives
Integrations
Travis CI Slack iDoneThis Bitbucket GitHub Git Azure DevOps CircleCI GitLab Trello	Scala .NET GitHub CircleCI Docker JavaScript Node.js Python Golang Java

What are some alternatives to Review Board, Snyk?

Code Climate

After each Git push, Code Climate analyzes your code for complexity, duplication, and common smells to determine changes in quality and surface technical debt hotspots.

Codacy

Codacy automates code reviews and monitors code quality on every commit and pull request on more than 40 programming languages reporting back the impact of every commit or PR, issues concerning code style, best practices and security.

Phabricator

Phabricator is a collection of open source web applications that help software companies build better software.

PullReview

PullReview helps Ruby and Rails developers to develop new features cleanly, on-time, and with confidence by automatically reviewing their code.

Gerrit Code Review

Gerrit is a self-hosted pre-commit code review tool. It serves as a Git hosting server with option to comment incoming changes. It is highly configurable and extensible with default guarding policies, webhooks, project access control and more.

SonarQube

SonarQube provides an overview of the overall health of your source code and even more importantly, it highlights issues found on new code. With a Quality Gate set on your project, you will simply fix the Leak and start mechanically improving.

RuboCop

RuboCop is a Ruby static code analyzer. Out of the box it will enforce many of the guidelines outlined in the community Ruby Style Guide.

CodeFactor.io

CodeFactor.io automatically and continuously tracks code quality with every GitHub or BitBucket commit and pull request, helping software developers save time in code reviews and efficiently tackle technical debt.

ESLint

A pluggable and configurable linter tool for identifying and reporting on patterns in JavaScript. Maintain your code quality with ease.

Amazon CodeGuru

It is a machine learning service for automated code reviews and application performance recommendations. It helps you find the most expensive lines of code that hurt application performance and keep you up all night troubleshooting, then gives you specific recommendations to fix or improve your code.