Rundeck vs Tower

Overview

Tower

Stacks214

Followers360

Votes80

Rundeck

Stacks204

Followers343

Votes7

Rundeck vs Tower: What are the differences?

<Write Introduction here>

Cost: One key difference between Rundeck and Tower is the cost. Rundeck is an open-source automation tool that is free to use, while Tower, developed by Red Hat, is a commercial product and requires a subscription to access all its features.
Community Support: Rundeck has a strong community support system where users can find help, documentation, and plugins developed by the community. On the other hand, Tower provides official support from Red Hat, ensuring timely assistance and updates for users.
Scalability: Tower offers more scalability options compared to Rundeck. It can handle larger environments with more nodes and has features specifically designed for enterprise-level automation tasks.
Integration: When it comes to integration capabilities, Tower has deeper integrations with various tools and technologies commonly used in IT operations. Rundeck also supports integrations but may require more effort and customization compared to Tower.
User Interface: Tower provides a sleek and user-friendly interface that simplifies the automation process for users. Rundeck, while functional, may not offer the same level of intuitiveness in its interface design.
Enterprise Features: Tower comes with additional enterprise features such as role-based access control, auditing, and reporting capabilities that cater to the security and compliance needs of large organizations. Rundeck may lack some of these advanced features in its open-source version.

In Summary, Rundeck and Tower differ in cost, community support, scalability, integration capabilities, user interface design, and availability of enterprise features.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Detailed Comparison

Tower	Rundeck
Use all of Git's powerful feature set - in a GUI that makes you more productive.	A self-service operations platform used for support tasks, enterprise job scheduling, deployment, and more.
Clone & create repos with a click - Manage your GitHub, Bitbucket & Beanstalk accounts from within Tower;Open repos quickly - Tower's "Quick Open" dialog finds and opens repositories in no time;Automate the boring stuff - Fetching and stashing are automatically done for you, if you wish;Clone in the background- Downloading large projects happens in the background, while you work;Multiple windows - Have multiple projects open side-by-side	-
Statistics
Stacks 214	Stacks 204
Followers 360	Followers 343
Votes 80	Votes 7
Pros & Cons
Pros 19 Git 16 Just works 10 Version control 6 Awesome 6 Simple layout Cons 5 Expensive 4 Subscription based 1 No side by side diff 0 Merge conflict resolution impossible/unclear	Pros 3 Easy to understand 3 Role based access control 1 Doesn't need containers
Integrations
Bitbucket TextMate Visual Studio GitHub GitLab Git Xcode Gerrit Code Review Beanstalk	Ansible Jenkins

What are some alternatives to Tower, Rundeck?

Ansible

Ansible is an IT automation tool. It can configure systems, deploy software, and orchestrate more advanced IT tasks such as continuous deployments or zero downtime rolling updates. Ansible’s goals are foremost those of simplicity and maximum ease of use.

SourceTree

Use the full capability of Git and Mercurial in the SourceTree desktop app. Manage all your repositories, hosted or local, through SourceTree's simple interface.

Chef

Chef enables you to manage and scale cloud infrastructure with no downtime or interruptions. Freely move applications and configurations from one cloud to another. Chef is integrated with all major cloud providers including Amazon EC2, VMWare, IBM Smartcloud, Rackspace, OpenStack, Windows Azure, HP Cloud, Google Compute Engine, Joyent Cloud and others.

Terraform

With Terraform, you describe your complete infrastructure as code, even as it spans multiple service providers. Your servers may come from AWS, your DNS may come from CloudFlare, and your database may come from Heroku. Terraform will build all these resources across all these providers in parallel.

GitKraken

The downright luxurious Git client for Windows, Mac and Linux. Cross-platform, 100% standalone, and free.

Capistrano

Capistrano is a remote server automation tool. It supports the scripting and execution of arbitrary tasks, and includes a set of sane-default deployment workflows.

Puppet Labs

Puppet is an automated administrative engine for your Linux, Unix, and Windows systems and performs administrative tasks (such as adding users, installing packages, and updating server configurations) based on a centralized specification.

Salt

Salt is a new approach to infrastructure management. Easy enough to get running in minutes, scalable enough to manage tens of thousands of servers, and fast enough to communicate with them in seconds. Salt delivers a dynamic communication bus for infrastructures that can be used for orchestration, remote execution, configuration management and much more.

Fork

Manage your repositories without leaving the application. Organize the repositores into categories. Fork's Diff Viewer provides a clear view to spot the changes in your source code quickly.

Fabric

Fabric is a Python (2.5-2.7) library and command-line tool for streamlining the use of SSH for application deployment or systems administration tasks. It provides a basic suite of operations for executing local or remote shell commands (normally or via sudo) and uploading/downloading files, as well as auxiliary functionality such as prompting the running user for input, or aborting execution.

Related Comparisons

Rundeck vs Tower: What are the differences?

<Write Introduction here>

Cost: One key difference between Rundeck and Tower is the cost. Rundeck is an open-source automation tool that is free to use, while Tower, developed by Red Hat, is a commercial product and requires a subscription to access all its features.
Community Support: Rundeck has a strong community support system where users can find help, documentation, and plugins developed by the community. On the other hand, Tower provides official support from Red Hat, ensuring timely assistance and updates for users.
Scalability: Tower offers more scalability options compared to Rundeck. It can handle larger environments with more nodes and has features specifically designed for enterprise-level automation tasks.
Integration: When it comes to integration capabilities, Tower has deeper integrations with various tools and technologies commonly used in IT operations. Rundeck also supports integrations but may require more effort and customization compared to Tower.
User Interface: Tower provides a sleek and user-friendly interface that simplifies the automation process for users. Rundeck, while functional, may not offer the same level of intuitiveness in its interface design.
Enterprise Features: Tower comes with additional enterprise features such as role-based access control, auditing, and reporting capabilities that cater to the security and compliance needs of large organizations. Rundeck may lack some of these advanced features in its open-source version.

In Summary, Rundeck and Tower differ in cost, community support, scalability, integration capabilities, user interface design, and availability of enterprise features.

Rundeck vs Tower

Overview