StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Testing Frameworks
  4. Browser Testing
  5. Selenide vs Selenium

Selenide vs Selenium

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Selenium
Selenium
Stacks16.2K
Followers12.6K
Votes527
GitHub Stars33.6K
Forks8.6K
Selenide
Selenide
Stacks56
Followers85
Votes16
GitHub Stars0
Forks0

Selenide vs Selenium: What are the differences?

Introduction: Selenide is a concise and developer-friendly Selenium-based library for testing web applications, while Selenium is a widely-used open-source framework for automating web browsers.

1. Speed and Performance: One of the key differences between Selenide and Selenium is their speed and performance. Selenide is generally faster than Selenium due to its built-in smart waiting mechanism. Selenide automatically waits for elements to appear before performing any action on them, resulting in faster test execution and reduced flakiness.

2. Simplified Syntax: Selenide provides a simplified syntax compared to Selenium, making it easier to write and read tests. Selenide uses method chaining and concise syntax, allowing developers to write clean and compact code. On the other hand, Selenium's syntax can be more verbose and less intuitive for newcomers.

3. Automatic Retries: Selenide automatically retries failed operations, such as element interactions or page loading, without the need for explicit wait conditions. This robust retry mechanism reduces the need for developers to handle explicit waits and increases test stability. In contrast, Selenium requires explicit waits to handle dynamic elements or page loading, which can make the test code more complex.

4. Easy Setup and Configuration: Selenide provides a simplified setup and configuration process compared to Selenium. With Selenide, developers only need to add a single dependency to their project, and the necessary web driver is automatically downloaded and managed. In contrast, Selenium requires manual setup and configuration of the web driver, which can be time-consuming and error-prone.

5. Better Error Reporting: Selenide offers more informative and user-friendly error messages compared to Selenium. When a test fails, Selenide provides detailed error messages with suggestions for troubleshooting. These error messages are designed to help developers quickly identify and fix issues. Selenium, on the other hand, may provide less descriptive error messages, requiring developers to spend more time diagnosing the root cause.

6. Integration with Testing Frameworks: Selenide integrates seamlessly with popular testing frameworks, such as JUnit and TestNG, making it easier to organize and execute tests. It provides convenient annotations and utilities for test setup and teardown, test grouping, and parallel test execution. While Selenium can also be integrated with these frameworks, Selenide offers a smoother and more streamlined integration experience.

In Summary, Selenide offers faster speed and improved performance, simplified syntax, automatic retries, easier setup and configuration, better error reporting, and seamless integration with testing frameworks, making it a developer-friendly alternative to Selenium for web application testing.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Selenium, Selenide

Esther
Esther

Feb 16, 2020

Needs adviceonreact-testing-libraryreact-testing-library

Hi, I am starting out to test an application that is currently being developed - FE: React. BE: Node JS. I want the framework to be able to test all UI scenarios (from simple to complex) and also have the capability to test APIs. I also need to run tests across all OSs and Browsers (Windows, Mac, Android, iOS). I have also looked into react-testing-library and @TestProject.io. Any advice you can give as to which framework would be best and why would be so much appreciated! Thank you!!

96.5k views96.5k
Comments
Shivam
Shivam

Mar 5, 2020

Needs advice

we are having one web application developed in Reacts.js. in the application, we have only 4 to 5 pages that we need to test. I am having experience in selenium with java. Please suggets which tool I should use. and why ............................ ............................ .............................

241k views241k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Selenium
Selenium
Selenide
Selenide

Selenium automates browsers. That's it! What you do with that power is entirely up to you. Primarily, it is for automating web applications for testing purposes, but is certainly not limited to just that. Boring web-based administration tasks can (and should!) also be automated as well.

It is a library for writing concise, readable, boilerplate-free tests in Java using Selenium WebDriver.

-
Concise fluent API for tests; Ajax support for stable tests; Powerful selectors; Simple configuration
Statistics
GitHub Stars
33.6K
GitHub Stars
0
GitHub Forks
8.6K
GitHub Forks
0
Stacks
16.2K
Stacks
56
Followers
12.6K
Followers
85
Votes
527
Votes
16
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 177
    Automates browsers
  • 154
    Testing
  • 101
    Essential tool for running test automation
  • 24
    Record-Playback
  • 24
    Remote Control
Cons
  • 8
    Flaky tests
  • 4
    Slow as needs to make browser (even with no gui)
  • 2
    Update browser drivers
Pros
  • 5
    Nice JAVA API
  • 2
    Integrated with WebDriverManager project
  • 2
    Very mature API
  • 2
    Integrated with Selenium-Jupiter framework
  • 2
    File upload support
Cons
  • 1
    Hybrid page model not possible
Integrations
No integrations available
BrowserStack
BrowserStack
Android Studio
Android Studio
Selendroid
Selendroid
Sauce Labs
Sauce Labs

What are some alternatives to Selenium, Selenide?

BrowserStack

BrowserStack

BrowserStack is the leading test platform built for developers & QAs to expand test coverage, scale & optimize testing with cross-browser, real device cloud, accessibility, visual testing, test management, and test observability.

Sauce Labs

Sauce Labs

Cloud-based automated testing platform enables developers and QEs to perform functional, JavaScript unit, and manual tests with Selenium or Appium on web and mobile apps. Videos and screenshots for easy debugging. Secure and CI-ready.

LambdaTest

LambdaTest

LambdaTest platform provides secure, scalable and insightful test orchestration for website, and mobile app testing. Customers at different points in their DevOps lifecycle can leverage Automation and/or Manual testing on LambdaTest.

Karma

Karma

Karma is not a testing framework, nor an assertion library. Karma just launches a HTTP server, and generates the test runner HTML file you probably already know from your favourite testing framework. So for testing purposes you can use pretty much anything you like.

Robot Framework

Robot Framework

It is a generic test automation framework for acceptance testing and acceptance test-driven development. It has easy-to-use tabular test data syntax and it utilizes the keyword-driven testing approach. Its testing capabilities can be extended by test libraries implemented either with Python or Java, and users can create new higher-level keywords from existing ones using the same syntax that is used for creating test cases.

Karate DSL

Karate DSL

Combines API test-automation, mocks and performance-testing into a single, unified framework. The BDD syntax popularized by Cucumber is language-neutral, and easy for even non-programmers. Besides powerful JSON & XML assertions, you can run tests in parallel for speed - which is critical for HTTP API testing.

Playwright

Playwright

It is a Node library to automate the Chromium, WebKit and Firefox browsers with a single API. It enables cross-browser web automation that is ever-green, capable, reliable and fast.

Rainforest QA

Rainforest QA

Rainforest gives you the reliability of a QA team and the speed of automation, without the hassle of managing a team or the pain of writing automated tests.

WebdriverIO

WebdriverIO

WebdriverIO lets you control a browser or a mobile application with just a few lines of code. Your test code will look simple, concise and easy to read.

Cucumber

Cucumber

Cucumber is a tool that supports Behaviour-Driven Development (BDD) - a software development process that aims to enhance software quality and reduce maintenance costs.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana