Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
Selenide vs Selenium: What are the differences?
Introduction: Selenide is a concise and developer-friendly Selenium-based library for testing web applications, while Selenium is a widely-used open-source framework for automating web browsers.
1. Speed and Performance: One of the key differences between Selenide and Selenium is their speed and performance. Selenide is generally faster than Selenium due to its built-in smart waiting mechanism. Selenide automatically waits for elements to appear before performing any action on them, resulting in faster test execution and reduced flakiness.
2. Simplified Syntax: Selenide provides a simplified syntax compared to Selenium, making it easier to write and read tests. Selenide uses method chaining and concise syntax, allowing developers to write clean and compact code. On the other hand, Selenium's syntax can be more verbose and less intuitive for newcomers.
3. Automatic Retries: Selenide automatically retries failed operations, such as element interactions or page loading, without the need for explicit wait conditions. This robust retry mechanism reduces the need for developers to handle explicit waits and increases test stability. In contrast, Selenium requires explicit waits to handle dynamic elements or page loading, which can make the test code more complex.
4. Easy Setup and Configuration: Selenide provides a simplified setup and configuration process compared to Selenium. With Selenide, developers only need to add a single dependency to their project, and the necessary web driver is automatically downloaded and managed. In contrast, Selenium requires manual setup and configuration of the web driver, which can be time-consuming and error-prone.
5. Better Error Reporting: Selenide offers more informative and user-friendly error messages compared to Selenium. When a test fails, Selenide provides detailed error messages with suggestions for troubleshooting. These error messages are designed to help developers quickly identify and fix issues. Selenium, on the other hand, may provide less descriptive error messages, requiring developers to spend more time diagnosing the root cause.
6. Integration with Testing Frameworks: Selenide integrates seamlessly with popular testing frameworks, such as JUnit and TestNG, making it easier to organize and execute tests. It provides convenient annotations and utilities for test setup and teardown, test grouping, and parallel test execution. While Selenium can also be integrated with these frameworks, Selenide offers a smoother and more streamlined integration experience.
In Summary, Selenide offers faster speed and improved performance, simplified syntax, automatic retries, easier setup and configuration, better error reporting, and seamless integration with testing frameworks, making it a developer-friendly alternative to Selenium for web application testing.
we are having one web application developed in Reacts.js. in the application, we have only 4 to 5 pages that we need to test. I am having experience in selenium with java. Please suggets which tool I should use. and why ............................ ............................ .............................
with the help of selenium we can automate react js for functional testing
Hi, I am starting out to test an application that is currently being developed - FE: React. BE: Node JS. I want the framework to be able to test all UI scenarios (from simple to complex) and also have the capability to test APIs. I also need to run tests across all OSs and Browsers (Windows, Mac, Android, iOS). I have also looked into react-testing-library and @TestProject.io. Any advice you can give as to which framework would be best and why would be so much appreciated! Thank you!!
You should also definitely look into Playwright, which is a new automation tool from Microsoft building on top of the Puppeteer experience and trying to bring this experience in the cross browser space - very exciting project. Great team. Also CodeceptJS as already Playwright support which at a ton of valuable features on top of Playwright, give it a go!
I'm also looking for the same, FE: React & BE: NodeJS. Cypress won't help as it lacks cross-browser testing, it doesn't support all the browsers. I'm still investigating it, but looks like WebdriverIO may fulfil what I'm looking for - Cross-browser testing, integration with CI/CD, running it as a docker service, good support on assertions & reporting of test results. Let me know if you found any information on any of the above mentioned points.
Hi Esther, if you really need cross OS and cross device automation Cypress wont help, with WebdriverIO you can do it … and check out CodeceptJS, which is a wrapper around several frameworks (like WebdriverIO) and will support future players (currently for example upcoming Playwright) as well.
Pros of Selenide
- Nice JAVA API5
- Very mature API2
- File upload support2
- Integrated with WebDriverManager project2
- Integrated with Selenium-Jupiter framework2
- Capture screen shots on fail1
- Cross browser1
- Proxy server1
Pros of Selenium
- Automates browsers177
- Testing154
- Essential tool for running test automation101
- Record-Playback24
- Remote Control24
- Data crawling8
- Supports end to end testing7
- Easy set up6
- Functional testing6
- The Most flexible monitoring system4
- End to End Testing3
- Easy to integrate with build tools3
- Comparing the performance selenium is faster than jasm2
- Record and playback2
- Compatible with Python2
- Easy to scale2
- Integration Tests2
- Integrated into Selenium-Jupiter framework0
Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions
Cons of Selenide
- Hybrid page model not possible1
Cons of Selenium
- Flaky tests8
- Slow as needs to make browser (even with no gui)4
- Update browser drivers2